[Epdp-dt] Membership Composition - All Stakeholder Groups Must Have Parity in Numbers

Dear all, I hope that I am mis-reading the table in [this section of the charter](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1I3LJkIN1Xdp8lW92fLq5d_bLgFv7gWQvOb9mgVSJ...). From what I see, it has been proposed that the Commercial Stakeholder Group will have 9 members on the EPDP, whereas all other Stakeholder Groups will have 3 members. This is fundamentally unfair and we require parity. If this is not an error, I would like to know based on what rationale it was thought to allocate 9 membership slots to the CSG while all other Stakeholder Groups have only 3 members. At the NCPH level, it is essential that there be parity in membership numbers between the CSG and the NCSG. Thank you, Ayden Férdeline