Hi Lutz, Can you give us some background on this ? What is it about ? Thanks, Patrick On 06 Dec 2010, at 16:59, Lutz Donnerhacke wrote:
On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 08:10:47PM -0500, Staci Dresher wrote:
I am following up on my email from two days ago regarding the background review on behalf of ICANN. Please let me know that you received this email
I received this email.
and will provide the completed consent and disclosure form shortly (consent form attached for your convenience).
Unfortunly I've to oppose.
Signing this form would violate local law, that's why please abstain from insiting on it. There are several critical points:
1) The form assumes an employment relationship between ICANN and myself. Please remember: ALAC members are not employees of ICANN.
2) Investigations about persons might legitimate by the local law of the company which tries to establish an relationship. It's not possible to circumvent local law of the investigated subject by urging them to agree without any alternatives. Even to try so is simply illegal in Germany.
3) Granted the role of ALAC as a recommendation and supervision body within ICANN, it's not only unethical to collect information about private details (i.e. the financal situation) of the people doing the job. Such a attitute raises serious constrains about the relationship between ICANN and ALAC itself. Delicate private information must not be available to the body to be "controlled".
Cc: EURALO Board. _______________________________________________ Euro-board mailing list Euro-board@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-board
-- Patrick Vande Walle Please note my new mobile number: +32 497636476 Blog: http://patrick.vande-walle.eu Twitter: http://twitter.vande-walle.eu Facebook: http://facebook.vande-walle.eu LinkedIn: http://linkedin.vande-walle.eu