Dear all, I am sorry to be late with my Season greetings and best wishes to all of you, and with reaction to Wolf proposition (we had to spend our holidays without Internet). European Media Platform supported Article 19 initiative last autumn, but it would be great to repeat it once again with EURALO. Please accept our support for this letter. Best regards, Oksana On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 7:27 PM, Wolf Ludwig <wolf.ludwig@comunica-ch.net>wrote:
And here below you can find the listing of co-signatories to the letter, Karmen kindly provided me before.
Thanks for your support and regards, Wolf
Karmen Turk wrote Thu, 9 Jan 2014 08:53:
Hi Wolf,
Thank you again for your support again. I paste here FYI the list of supporters as it stands today. Any time EURALO decides to support, we would apprecate that as well :)
Regards, Karmen
Algemene Vereniging van Beroepsjournalisten in Belgiƫ American Society of News Editors ARTICLE 19 Association of American Publishers, Inc Association of European Journalists Bloomberg bvba Les Journaux Francophones Belges Chaos Computer Club Conde Nast International Ltd. Daily Beast Company Digital First Media, LLC Digital Media Law Project, Harvard University Digital Rights Ireland
Dow Jones EDRI Electronic Frontier Finland Estonian Newspapers Assotation (Eesti Ajalehtede Liit) European Information Society Institute (EISi) (via Karmen) Federatie van periodieke pers, the Ppress Forbes Human Rights Center, Ghent University Hungarian Civil Liberties Union I'Minds ICRI Leuven Index on Censorship (Kirsty Hughes - via Peter) International Press Institute Internet Democracy Project (Anja Kovacs - via Karmen) La Quadrature du Net Lithuanian Online Media Association Mass Media Defence Center Media Foundation (Leipzig) (via Dirk) Media Law Resource Center MLDI National Press Photographers Association National Public Radio Nederlandse Vereniging van Journalistiek Net Users' Rights Protection Association New York Times News Corps Newspaper Association of America North Jersey Media Group, Inc NUV (Nederlands Uitgeversverbond) Online News Association Open Media Coalition - Italy Open Rights Group Panoptykon PEN International PEN-Vlaanderen (via Dirk) Persvrijheidsfonds Radio Television Digital News Association Raycom Media Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press Telegraaf Media Groep Guardian News & Media Limited Thomson Reuters Vereniging voor Media- en Communicatierecht Vlaamse Nieuwsmedia (via Dirk) Vlaamse Vereniging van Journalisten Vrijschrift World Association of Newspapers and News Publishers European Publishers Council Global Voices Advocacy
Some additional natural persons: Wolf Ludwig (Founding and board member of EURALO - ICANN's European At-Large organisation; founding member and co-organiser of the European Dialogue on Internet Governance (EuroDIG)) Dr. Ben Wagner, Post-Doctoral Research Fellow, Annenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania Angela Daly (Postdoc researcher at the European University Institute (Italy) and Swinburne Institute for Social Research (Australia)) Douwe Korff - London Met Professor Nicolo Zingales (Assistant Professor of Law, Tilburg University) Giancarlo F Frosio, SJD (Intermediary Liability Fellow, Center for Internet and Society, Stanford Law School)
-----Original Message----- From: Wolf Ludwig [mailto:wolf.ludwig@comunica-ch.net] Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2014 7:11 PM To: Karmen Turk Subject: Re: [IRPCoalition] Delfi v Estonia in European Court of Human Rights
Hi Karmen,
thanks for this troubling info. Until Wednesday I won't have sufficient time to consult with my colleagues or Board members from EURALO (ICANN's European At-Large organization). But if you wish, you can add my name in my personal capacity.
Thanks and regards, Wolf Ludwig
Karmen Turk wrote Tue, 7 Jan 2014 10:43:
Hi all,
Happy New Year and welcome to new Co-Chair and Steering Committee members!
As many of you know, a chamber of the European Court of Human Rights recently held, in Delfi v. Estonia, that a website is strictly liable for defamatory content in any user-generated content posted by a third party. This position will be familiar to you, because it is essentially the rule we endured in the United States prior to the passage of Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. In the EU, the E-Commerce Directive moderates that result somewhat, permitting a site to avoid liability if it deletes potentially defamatory content upon notice. But remarkably, the ECHR affirmed the views of the Estonian national courts that this rule applied to ISPs and not to websites who have solicited comments from readers -- in the Delfi case, the publication had actually taken the comment down on request, but was still found liable. Needless to say, this is a decision that could inhibit free expression online, and will likely lead to media avoiding online comments in many cou! ntries. (A detailed assessment of it can be found here< http://www.article19.org/resources.php/resource/37287/en/european-court-stri... )
Peter Noorlander, (the chief executive of the Media Legal Defence Initiative in London), Gabrielle Guillemin (from Article 19), Dirk Voorhoof (recognized human rights scientist), are heading up an effort to encourage the Grand Chamber of the ECHR to review and reverse the Delfi decision. They have drafted the attached letter for that purpose, and are encouraging media companies and associations to lend their support and name to the effort. This is especially important since there were no judges dissenting from the judgment.
There is no cost associated with this request. If you would like to be included, there is two possibilities:
- Just let me know by Wednesday evening and I shall add you (or your organization) to the list of supporters;
- Or you can send the letter yourself to ECHR. The letter is available under Creative Commons license CC CA :)
PS: I do apologize for quite a short deadline :)
Kind Regards,
Karmen
Kind regards,
[Description: C:\Users\karmen.turk\AppData\Roaming\Microsoft\Signatures\blank.gif]
Karmen Turk Advocate
[Description: C:\Users\karmen.turk\AppData\Roaming\Microsoft\Signatures\triniti-ee.gi f]
[Description: C:\Users\karmen.turk\AppData\Roaming\Microsoft\Signatures\blank.gif]
M
+372 513 3181
P
+372 685 0950
F
+372 685 0951
[Description: C:\Users\karmen.turk\AppData\Roaming\Microsoft\Signatures\blank.gif]
TRINITI TALLINN Tartu mnt 2, 10145 Tallinn, Estonia karmen.turk@triniti.ee<mailto:karmen.turk@triniti.ee> www.triniti.ee<http://www.triniti.ee/>
[Description: C:\Users\karmen.turk\AppData\Roaming\Microsoft\Signatures\blank.gif]
Triniti is a Pan-Baltic, cross-border legal practice
The content of this email, including all attachments, is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient hereof, please notify immediately Triniti Tallinn office (Law Firm Tamme Otsmann Ruus Vabamets) and delete this email! Any disclosure, copying, distribution or any other use of its content is strictly prohibited.
-----Original Message----- From: irp-bounces@lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org [mailto:irp-bounces@lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org] On Behalf Of Shawna Finnegan Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2014 12:17 AM To: IRP@lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org Subject: Re: [IRPCoalition] IRP in 2014
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
Happy new year, and welcome to the new co-Chair and Steering committee members!
Marianne, thanks for this email. Wolfgang's post is a fantastic orientation for the upcoming year.
I completely agree that there is no need to reinvent the wheel. The fact that 80% of principles in recent declarations on IG are the same, according to Wolfgang, suggests that we are very much on the right track. Continuing down that track, I think prioritizing one charter or declaration over others in developing a global set of principles might undermine the collaborative process.
While the IRP Charter is a robust starting point for a global multi-stakeholder principles on IG, it would be great to map the 80% overlap in recent principles (if Wolfgang has not already done so), and work with our networks and communities to articulate shared language based on that framework.
Looking forward to others' thoughts,
Shawna
On 14-01-02 05:25 AM, Marianne Franklin wrote:
Apologies for a double-mailing but should have sent the message below
under a new message heading. On 02/01/2014 12:21, Marianne Franklin
wrote:
Dear all
Happy 2014. Thank you Olivier for the positive vibes this early in
the year too.
As preparations for the Brazil Meeting in April gather steam, a main
agenda item and output is now clear; to produce a "global"
set of Internet Governance principles.
Wolfgang Kleinwaechter, who has been undertaking a survey of all
existing statements around IG Principles including those that include
human rights and principles, has provided one comprehensive review of
the year past and the year ahead in this respect (
http://www.circleid.com/posts/20131231_internet_governance_outlook_2 0
14_good_news_bad_news_no_news/
At the end of this analysis, Wolfgang makes the following comment
about the leading role the UDHR played historically in setting the
frame for subsequent international human rights law: that it "would
be good to have a similar document for the Internet, supported not
only by the governments of the 193 UN member states but also by all
the non-governmental stakeholders from the private sector as Google
and Facebook, the technical community as ICANN and the IETF and civil
society as APC and Human Rights Watch."
Point taken but for the fact that the IRP Charter already exists in
this capacity. Its 21 clauses are explicitly - and elegantly
- embedded in the UDHR and these subsequent treaties. It was the
product of collaborative work, within the IGF setting to be sure, of
individuals and organizations all mentioned in this comment.
Government reps and IGO reps have been active as well in the Charter
work. Endorsements by a range of actors are currently being gathered
as the 2nd Edition of the Charter Booklet is ready to go public. We
also have several translations in process so here there is a
grassroots support level for the work.
But, Brazil is a so-called high level meeting and its outcomes will
be symbolic and perhaps groundbreaking from an inter-governmental
point of view (perhaps not but that remains to be seen). With more
and more support for a human-rights based approach to IG in the wake
of the Snowden revelations, it appears that we could be facing the
embedding of a disconnect between this shift in mood, one that
underscores the IRP Charter project after-the-fact, and the fact that
these calls since Snowden are already encapsulated by the IRP Charter
in its entirety.
Given this recognition that human rights online do matter
(underscored too by initiatives such as the 13 Principles by PI, EFF,
Access et al) do need protecting, what remains to be seen is whether
all those concerned with making Brazil a success and based on the
good parts of the IGF working model, the IRP Charter can be taken on
board in a more explicit capacity. By this I mean that it is the
document that is adopted and recognized in the fullest sense of the
term ("legally non-binding high level principles"). This is because
the IRP Charter remains the one document that already complies with
these calls; from within the IGF community and further abroad in the
UN, and technical community where high profile figures such as Tim
Berners-Lee are calling for a global Bill of Digital Rights.
It would be a shame, and a mistake to my mind, for us to not to make
use of the same sort of collaborative and creative energy within this
list alone, and links to wider networks to promote the Charter for
this role whilst supporting the Brazil Meeting aim to generate a
broad sort of global consensus. We do not need to re-reinvent the
wheel here.
What do people think? best MF
On 01/01/2014 18:39, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond wrote:
Thanks for these excellent news!
I am thrilled to see such talent leading the IRP. May it go from
strength to strength! Best wishes to you all for 2014.
Olivier
On 24/12/2013 17:54, IRPCoalition wrote:
> Dear all
>
> The election/endorsement process for the IRP Coalition's Steering
> Committee is over (37 people took part with 86.5% support, 5.4%
> against, and 8.1% abstaining). Thank you for the positive comments
> about all we have achieved this year and also for the constructive
> suggestions for the year to come. The new SC met last week so this
> email is to formally re-introduce everyone to you all.
>
> First up, our incoming co-Chair who will be serving with Marianne
> this year. Robert has worked with the IRP since 2008, seeing the
> first charter through, setting up and then assisting with the
> website and social media efforts, and also supporting IRP events > at
> the IGF meetings. After being on the steering committee for the
> last few years, championing the IRP in all capacities, he is happy
> to provide continuity and support as co-chair of the IRP. Robert > is
> excited about growing participation in the coalition, ramping up
> dissemination of the Charter in different engaging formats
> (socio-technical, educational), and exploring new ways of
> integrating Human Rights in Internet Governance at all levels. > This
> work complements his teaching and research as an engaged academic.
>
> Next here are the SC members for 2014 (bio notes will be up on the
> website shortly):
>
> Co-Chairs Marianne Franklin (New Zealand/UK) Robert Bodle
> (USA)
>
> Steering Committee Rafik Dammak (Tunisia/Japan) Catherine Easton
> (UK) Dixie Hawtin (UK) Matthias Kettemann (Austria) Parminder Jeet
> Singh (India) Carlos Affonso Pereira de Souza
> (Brazil) Vik Szabados (Hungary) Tapani Tarvainen (Finland)
>
> We are all looking forward to a productive year for the protection
> and enjoyment of human rights online - for everyone, everywhere.
>
> Warm regards MF/RB and the whole SC
>
> www.internetrightsandprinciples.org<http://www.internetrightsandpr > inciples.org>
> @netrights
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________ IRP mailing list
> IRP@lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org<mailto:IRP@lists.interne > trightsandprinciples.org>
> http://lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listi > n
> fo/irp
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
IRP mailing list IRP@lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org<mailto:IRP@lists.internet rightsandprinciples.org>
http://lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listin f
o/irp
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/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=DgBa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
IRP mailing list
IRP@lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org<mailto:IRP@lists.internetrigh tsandprinciples.org>
http://lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/i rp
EuroDIG Secretariat http://www.eurodig.org/ mobile +41 79 204 83 87 Skype: Wolf-Ludwig
EURALO - ICANN's Regional At-Large Organisation http://euralo.org
Profile on LinkedIn http://ch.linkedin.com/in/wolfludwig
EuroDIG Secretariat http://www.eurodig.org/ mobile +41 79 204 83 87 Skype: Wolf-Ludwig
EURALO - ICANN's Regional At-Large Organisation http://euralo.org
Profile on LinkedIn http://ch.linkedin.com/in/wolfludwig _______________________________________________ Euro-board mailing list Euro-board@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-board