William Drake ha scritto:
Hello,
An update on the below. We did have a noon-time brainstorming meeting to discuss a Euralo response to the draft review, and we put down some ideas with the intent that these could later be elaborated and edited into a presentable document. However, input statements were solicited at the outset of the public forum a few hours later, before we were able to do an editing meeting. Frankly, this was ok, since it anyway would be much better to send a well crafted response reflecting consensus among Euralo members who've read through the entire report, rather than a quickie statement by just those who happened to be in Paris, few of whom had read more than the executive summary.
So from here, I would suggest that people read the full draft ALAC Review at http://www.icann.org/reviews/alac/alac-independent-review-final-draft-13jun0... and share any thoughts on the list that they propose be incorporated into a response, which presumably should be sent reasonably quickly. Wolf, et al, if you have any suggestions on timing, process management. etc please chime in.
Nonetheless, it would be good to use the list of points that we produced during the meeting - it seemed to be a good starting point. Perhaps whoever has it could post it to the list? Thanks, -- vb. Vittorio Bertola - vb [a] bertola.eu <-------- --------> finally with a new website at http://bertola.eu/ <--------