Hi all, This initiative sounds very interesting, and I'd like to be involved - however I too cannot confirm my presence in Copenhagen yet (= not an agenda issue but lack of funding) Regards, Bastiaan -- Envoyé de mon iPhone
On 24 Jan 2017, at 19:34, Christopher Wilkinson <cw@christopherwilkinson.eu> wrote:
Olivier. Erich: Assuming that I get to Copenhagen TBC, I should participate, having spent time (and writing) about Privacy in WHOIS last year.
CW
On 24 Jan 2017, at 17:44, Schweighofer Erich <erich.schweighofer@univie.ac.at> wrote:
Olivier, I would like to take part or lead on this topic; I have already spoken with the organisers of this session. Best, Erich
ao. Univ.-Prof. Mag. DDr. Erich Schweighofer Arbeitsgruppe Rechtsinformatik Institut für Europarecht, Internationales Recht und Rechtsvergleichung, Universität Wien Schottenbastei 10-16/2/5, 1010 Wien, AT Tel. +43 1 4277 35305, Fax +43 1 4277 9353 Erich.Schweighofer@univie.ac.at http://rechtsinformatik.univie.ac.at
Von: Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond<mailto:ocl@gih.com> Gesendet: Dienstag, 24. Jänner 2017 17:40 An: Discussion for At-Large Europe<mailto:euro-discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org> Betreff: [EURO-Discuss] Fwd: [Soac-leaders-icann58] Alternative HIT - Data Protection Commissioners
Hello all,
is there any interest in our community, to take part or lead in this topic? Kindest regards,
Olivier
-------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: [Soac-leaders-icann58] Alternative HIT - Data Protection Commissioners Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2017 20:53:35 +0000 From: James M. Bladel <jbladel@godaddy.com><mailto:jbladel@godaddy.com> To: SOAC Leaders ICANN58 <soac-leaders-icann58@icann.org><mailto:soac-leaders-icann58@icann.org>
Dear SOAC Leaders / ICANN58 Planning Team –
During the GNSO Council last week, there was discussion of a session at ICANN58 that would address data protection concerns in our industry, and would be attended by data protection commissioners from throughout the EU. These folks are especially interested in the ongoing work around WHOIS/RDS, and the Copenhagen location is easily accessible to prospective attendees.
Organizers of this session have asked the GNSO and other groups (GAC, I believe?) to support their inclusion on the meeting agenda. Additionally, as it appears that one of the HIT sessions may become available (Monday 1515-1645), I would like to propose that we consider repurposing this HIT slot to accommodate the growing interest in the “Data Protection Summit”.
If there is support among this group for proceeding, then I would ask the volunteer organizers of this session to produce an overview/agenda of their session, to ensure that the subject matter and format meets the expectations of all SO/ACs, and contributes to the furtherance of the RDS policy work already underway. I recognize that this is coming fairly late in to the process, but am hopeful that our group can be flexible in its consideration of this request. If we are unable to accommodate the proposal, please note that some version of this session will likely occur in Copenhagen anyway, albeit it would not enjoy an unconflicted HIT slot on the main schedule.
If possible, we should decide this week, so I can task the volunteers to either (a) develop the aforementioned session agenda, or (b) make alternative (non-HIT) scheduling arrangements.
Thank you,
J. ---------------- James Bladel GNSO Chair
_______________________________________________ EURO-Discuss mailing list EURO-Discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss
Homepage for the region: http://www.euralo.org
_______________________________________________ EURO-Discuss mailing list EURO-Discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss
Homepage for the region: http://www.euralo.org