+1 Bill On Apr 23, 2010, at 12:11 PM, Patrick Vande Walle wrote:
FWIW, I also support the NARALO statement. Actually, the comments I posted in a personal capacity go in the same direction: http://forum.icann.org/lists/icm-options-report/msg00523.html
On Fri, 23 Apr 2010 18:59:42 +0900, Adam Peake <ajp@glocom.ac.jp> wrote:
My view: Think the ALAC draft needs clarification: e.g. "(ALAC) is concerned with the transparency and accountability of the processes being undertaken BY STAFF and BOARD and not with any matters of content (apologies for caps :-))
agree.
"and as such the ALAC supports that the BOARD'S FURTHER CONSIDERATION OF THE ICM APPLICATION be carried out in an expedient, equitable, and defensible manner."
I would add : "in a manner that respects the decision of the Independent Review Panel."
I also support the NA RALO statement.
FWIW, I also support the NARALO statement. Actually, the comments I posted in a personal capacity go in the same direction: http://forum.icann.org/lists/icm-options-report/msg00523.html
Patrick
_______________________________________________ EURO-Discuss mailing list EURO-Discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss_atlarge-lists.i...
Homepage for the region: http://www.euralo.org
*********************************************************** William J. Drake Senior Associate Centre for International Governance Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies Geneva, Switzerland william.drake@graduateinstitute.ch www.graduateinstitute.ch/cig/drake.html ***********************************************************