May 3, 2007
6:13 p.m.
I was asking for abstaining from binding decisions. From Nicks's agenda: "If nobody else will propose an agenda, what I would suggest as a draft is: [...] We would then bring the results of these items back to the list, not for review, but as decisions." jeanette Rudi Vansnick wrote: > As far as I can read in the agenda proposed by Nick, there is no voting > tomorrow. > There for I see no reason for further delay. We have already been > discussing items and topics which were very clear and had enough > timespan being read by everyone considering the EURALO kick-off in > priority of some other work. > > I had also to organise myself in order to participate in what I consider > being an important item in the agenda of *my daily work for the Internet > community, listening to all and any Internet individual user.* > > rudi > > Jeanette Hofmann schreef: >> Hi, >> if it is indeed true that many ALs cannot participate tomorrow, it would >> be good to restrain from taking binding decisions. >> >> As the decisions taken in Lisbon have shown, it can somewhat poison the >> atmosphere if those physically present make decisions that don't reflect >> the preferences of those absent. For this very reason, IETF working >> groups don't vote in physical meetings or teleconferences, they use >> mailing lists for polls and the like to ensure that all interested >> parties have a chance to participate. >> >> jeanette >> >> >> Nick Ashton-Hart wrote: >> >>> >From the email replies sent to the list, this time and date were the >>> best - more people could do this time and date than any of the others >>> - which is why we set it that way. >>> >>> If nobody else will propose an agenda, what I would suggest as a draft is: >>> >>> 1) Discuss and agree the list of candidates - including whether or not >>> to include candidates who were proposed after the deadline. >>> >>> 2) Discuss and agree the total number of board seats for this election cycle. >>> >>> 3) Discuss and agree the length of the voting, the start date, and the >>> provisional list of voters and the number of days for ALSes not on the >>> call to provide their authorised voter. >>> >>> We would then bring the results of these items back to the list, not >>> for review, but as decisions. >>> >>> I will put this up on the Wiki as the *DRAFT* agenda which all ALSes >>> may then edit or extend - so we have something to start from. >>> >>> On 03/05/07, Annette Muehlberg <annette.muehlberg@web.de> wrote: >>> >>>> All, >>>> concerning the tel conf tomorrow: Many people said they cannot take part (myself offered a different time, one and a half hours earlier). Rudi and myself asked what it is about, as no one proposed an agenda yet. I proposed to discuss all issues online. I guess, the best is, that those who actually have the chance in taking part come up with a proposal for procedure which will be presented to all of us online. >>>> best >>>> annette >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Rudi Vansnick schrieb: >>>> >>>>> This fits for me ... if at least we will have a clear agenda and no >>>>> discussions about what is NOT written/signed in MoU and Bylaws. >>>>> >>>>> Rudi Vansnick >>>>> Chair ISOC Belgium >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> EURO-Discuss mailing list >> EURO-Discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org >> http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss_atlarge-lists.icann.org >> >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > EURO-Discuss mailing list > EURO-Discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org > http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss_atlarge-lists.icann.org