That is true - I hope that my various emails made clear the 'strong recommendation' nature of the outcomes of the teleconference. On 08/05/07, "Kleinwächter"@smtp01.icann.org <"Kleinwächter"@smtp01.icann.org> wrote:
Just for clarification.
My memory tells me that the telephone conference last Friday did not make "decisions" but formulated "strong recommendations". Each recognized ALS is a sovereign entity and has the right to veto or opt out. The problem is that obviously we have a fundamental problem to find consensus over procedures.
Insofar we have to go through the painful continuation of the debate to look for a compromise which reflects the divided reality in the EURALO in a fair and balanced way. It is certainly against the rule if from about 20 recognized units only seven units take part in a telephone conference and claim this as the "final word".
While I am in favour of moving forward fast, we should not do it at any price. We had no EURALO Board and elected European ALAC members for four years. It would not be a desaster, if we wait another two or six months to streamline our conflicts and to cerate the necessary confidence for a frutiful cooperation if it comes to substance.
Best regards
Wolfgang
-- -- Regards, Nick Ashton-Hart PO Box 32160 London N4 2XY United Kingdom UK Tel: +44 (20) 8800-1011 USA Tel: +1 (202) 657-5460 Fax: +44 (20) 7681-3135 mobile: +44 (7774) 932798 Win IM: ashtonhart@hotmail.com / AIM/iSight: nashtonhart@mac.com / Skype: nashtonhart Online Bio: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ashtonhart