Thanks Wolfgang. I stand corrected for the balloon. I heard nothing about governmental control of the media, and based on my personal impressions, I don't believe there is one. About the .ru, I have not checked any site, but I exchanged emails with people having email addresses under .ru, and had no problems. I am under the impression that the relationship with Russia are normalizing. The fact that the Russian/Georgian border is now open for all nationalities is an indication of this. I heard back then about the cable damage, but I had completely forgotten about when I was in the Caucasus, and heard nothing about it neither in Armenia nor in Georgia. Cheers, Roberto
-----Messaggio originale----- Da: euro-discuss-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto:euro-discuss- bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] Per conto di "Kleinwächter, Wolfgang" Inviato: venerdì 5 luglio 2013 17:01 A: Discussion for At-Large Europe Oggetto: Re: [EURO-Discuss] Trip to Caucasus - Chapter 3 - Georgia
Thanks Roberto for the very informative report.
Did you hear anything about Internet censorship, governmental control of media and the blogosphere in this country? How was the access to the .ru domain, which was stopped during the Georgian-Russian war a couple of years ago? Is there any discussion about the case where the line to Armenia was cut (by a digging woman) which led to an Internet blackout in Jerewan?
See you soon
wolfgang
BTW, the Google project is not with satellites but with balloons http://www.google.com/loon/. Here is an interesting legal question. The balloons are flying 20 km about sea level, that is in the airspace of a country. The border line between airspace and outerspace is about 80 km. However, if the balloon is over the ocean (20 km from the coast line of a country) it is not under any national jurisdiction. And the Convention of the Law of the Sea has no paragraph to regulate this.
________________________________
Von: euro-discuss-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org im Auftrag von Roberto Gaetano Gesendet: Fr 05.07.2013 14:37 An: 'Discussion for At-Large Europe' Betreff: [EURO-Discuss] Trip to Caucasus - Chapter 3 - Georgia
Hi all.
Following up my previous reports on Armenia and Azerbaijan, I would like to continue with Georgia. I will also have some final considerations on the region, and some recommendations, but that will be part of a future message.
My main contact in the country was Ramaz Kvatadze, from the Georgian Research and Educational Networking Association (GRENA - http://grena.ge/eng/). I had a very good meeting with him, and other short occasional conversations with other folks.
The main points that came out from the discussion with Ramaz were (to the best of my recollection, in random order, after validation by Ramaz):
.. There is an ISOC chapter, not member of the At-Large, some groups are participating in ISOC Community Grants programmes.
.. The infrastructure is in average good, but there are substantial differences between big cities and remote villages.
.. While the main problem in the countryside is connectivity, that must be improved, the main complaint in big cities is compliance of the operators with the promised quality of service.
.. The government has undertaken efforts for developing eGovernment, as of today there are many applications that allow citizen and organizations to obtain certificates and make declarations online.
.. The scientific and research community is not active on ICANN matters because there is no benefit associated to its participation.
.. The scientific and research community has strong collaboration with similar communities in other Caucasus countries as well as other geographical areas worldwide, but the main interest and efforts are devoted to cooperation with Europe.
.. Although Georgia feels strongly more European than Asian, the current location in AP as ICANN geographic region is not felt as an obstacle. However, the main goal of Georgia is to become real member of European community.
.. The adoption of new technologies (mobile telecommunication, internet) have been slowed down initially by the monopoly situation, but now the competition among operators favours rapid development and strong improvement of the infrastructure.
.. The main obstacle for further improvement of the ICT infrastructure is lack of financial resources, as private business is unable to invest in development in rural/mountain areas as these are scarcely populated and there will be not enough return on investment.
.. Georgia has good relationships with both Armenia and Azerbaijan, organizing regional meetings in Georgia is easier than in the neighboring countries. In fact almost all regional meetings are organized in Georgia.
To this, I would like to add some personal considerations.
I have travelled extensively, in cities and in rural areas, and have found fair to good internet connectivity. I have experienced a difference between cities and countryside, which confirms the feedback I had from Ramaz. However, the improvement of the connectivity seems no simple task, and other comments I have gathered from different sources, mainly individual internet users, is that the overall connectivity is not the first priority. From a different source, I have learned that Georgia is planning to lay down a second backbone cable that should connect east and west Georgia running close to the southern border (unfortunately, I was unable to get confirmation of this from other sources). It seems that addressing the risk of a cut in the intra- Georgian communication (between east and west Georgia) is a higher priority than addressing the connectivity in remote areas. The reason might appear obvious to people who know the recent history and the current threats of the region.
I am under the impression that tourism, that is a flourishing business in Georgia, and rightfully so, can be an incentive to the improvement of the internet infrastructure. For instance, my last day was in Batumi, touristic area on the Black Sea, close to the border with Turkey. I have found a large number of bars, coffee shops, restaurants, that were offering free WiFi. On the other hand, I compare this with Mestia, in the Svaneti, another place with high touristic potential, but on the Caucasus mountains, where no B&B offered WiFi, and I was unable to find any establishment included it. My assumption was, although it was difficult to verify this with the local people, that the limited bandwidth in some areas was the limiting factor. But, as I said, it is just my personal speculation.
I had another example of the situation in remote areas travelling to the Tusheti area (in the Caucasus mountains, north-east Georgia). The electric and telephone lines, installed in Soviet times, were abandoned because the cost of maintenance was too high, leaving the whole area without power and connectivity. It has to be said that the road itself to Omalo, the largest village in Tusheti, is passable only by 4x4 vehicles and the Abano pass itself is closed from October to May because of snow. However, the population got organized: almost every household has solar cells and is therefore autonomous for electrical power, and there are GSM (solar-powered) cells that ensure mobile phone connectivity to the valley. I was impressed by this, and thought that this could be an example for other parts of the world, where laying cables is too costly. Incidentally, at about the same time I heard the recent news about the experiments on internet connection via satellite in New Zealand, which shows that new ways are being explored.
Talking about mobile phones, there seems to be excellent market penetration. While it is true that the monopoly situation has slowed down the progress, my observation, in cities and also in remote areas, is that the initial delay has been caught up. There is a wide offer, and if you get a local SIM card you can reload it also at ATM-like machines that are widely available for different types of payments.
The last comment is about the geopolitical collocation of Georgia. I have to say that travelling through the country I had the impression to be in Europe. Just the signs in Georgian alphabet reminded me that I was in the Caucasus. As a matter of fact, this proximity to Europe made me forget to inquiry about another topic I wanted to get information on: the need, or not, for IDN. However, I have the feeling that, while this is probably an issue in large cities, the main problem in scarcely populated areas remains the connection.
Best regards,
Roberto
Additional note for EURALO: we need to seriously think about the regional distribution of the countries. I have seen the latest recommendation (http://www.icann.org/en/news/announcements/announcement-22jun13- en.htm), maybe we should have a quick check in Durban about the subject.
_______________________________________________ EURO-Discuss mailing list EURO-Discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss
Homepage for the region: http://www.euralo.org <http://www.euralo.org/>
_______________________________________________ EURO-Discuss mailing list EURO-Discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss
Homepage for the region: http://www.euralo.org