That wasn't the point Thomas. You all will have to sort things out between yourselves. The point was that it isn't usual or good practice to explain votes, state support for candidates, or anything related to an election during an election, except to raise a point of clarification if there is a lack of understanding. My statement was a statement of fact, a reminder of good practice in the conduct of elections. On 18/05/07, Thomas Roessler <roessler@does-not-exist.org> wrote:
On 2007-05-18 21:45:39 +0100, Nick Ashton-Hart wrote:
May I suggest to everyone that it is usual, during voting, not to either explain votes, state support for candidatures or choices, or the opposite.
May I suggest that this is a question that the parties affected can very well sort out without staff supervision?
-- Thomas Roessler <roessler@does-not-exist.org>
-- -- Regards, Nick Ashton-Hart PO Box 32160 London N4 2XY United Kingdom UK Tel: +44 (20) 8800-1011 USA Tel: +1 (202) 657-5460 Fax: +44 (20) 7681-3135 mobile: +44 (7774) 932798 Win IM: ashtonhart@hotmail.com / AIM/iSight: nashtonhart@mac.com / Skype: nashtonhart Online Bio: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ashtonhart