I support Annette's views. Desiree -- On 26 Nov 2010, at 14:13, Annette Muehlberg wrote:
Dear all,
I am surprised and somehow confused about the current voting procedure for the At-Large Board director selection. We discussed that we should have a second round of voting if none of the candidates receives more than 50% of the votes. I do not understand why we do not finish the EURALO voting procedure and have a second round of voting. The ALS-voting was intended and conducted under the premises to enable a directed – based on the preferences of our members – vote to the EURALO Chair.
Viewing the result, there could be some confusion now: Sébastien is ahead with one vote (7), followed by Alan (6) and 4 abstentions besides the 2 votes for Pierre. For the second ALAC voting round – that started today! –, this doesn’t offer a clear picture and enable guidance for the directed vote of our Chair. He would have to vote on the basis of a personal interpretation of those votes. Because there are six votes (abstentions and those for Pierre) that need to be redirected on the remaining candidates (Sébastien and Alan) – see the EURALO results:
[https://www.bigpulse.com/pollresults?code=1461UuvaaRwPXYzZm5RW7vAP]
I think our chair has to get a clear guidance and the EURALO members should have a chance to express their preferences for the second round and the remaining candidates until Sunday lunchtime.
Thanks for your support and regards,
Annette
_______________________________________________ EURO-Discuss mailing list EURO-Discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss
Homepage for the region: http://www.euralo.org