FWIW, I also support the NARALO statement. Actually, the comments I posted in a personal capacity go in the same direction: http://forum.icann.org/lists/icm-options-report/msg00523.html On Fri, 23 Apr 2010 18:59:42 +0900, Adam Peake <ajp@glocom.ac.jp> wrote:
My view: Think the ALAC draft needs clarification: e.g. "(ALAC) is concerned with the transparency and accountability of the processes being undertaken BY STAFF and BOARD and not with any matters of content (apologies for caps :-))
agree.
"and as such the ALAC supports that the BOARD'S FURTHER CONSIDERATION OF THE ICM APPLICATION be carried out in an expedient, equitable, and defensible manner."
I would add : "in a manner that respects the decision of the Independent Review Panel."
I also support the NA RALO statement.
FWIW, I also support the NARALO statement. Actually, the comments I posted in a personal capacity go in the same direction: http://forum.icann.org/lists/icm-options-report/msg00523.html Patrick