Good evening: Thankyou for these detailed and informative minutes. Under the matter of individual members, and the comments from Annette and Yrjo, among others, I did not say that Option B was "ideal". If anything I said that I supported it although it was "not ideal". I must say, that in this and other contexts, and as a general proposition, At Large and EURALO should concentrate our substantive debates on the policy issues affecting the user interest in ICANN. Our internal procedural matters are usually quite secondary, particularly as most of the final outcomes will not be "ideal" because they have to reflect a workable consensus - without undue delay - which allows us to get on with the substantive work. Just a thought, CW PS: WIth my apologies for leaving the call yesterday evening, early. On 19 Jan 2011, at 12:03, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond wrote:
Dear All,
I am really happy about the progress which was made in that call. Well done everyone. For anyone who has not managed to make it, please take 3 minutes to read through the minutes on:
https://community.icann.org/display/EURALO/Summary+Minutes+18+January+2011
If you have any query on any of the subjects discussed, please do not hesitate to ask them here.
Kind regards,
Olivier
Le 19/01/2011 09:59, ICANN At-Large Staff a écrit :
Dear All,
The summary minutes and action items from yesterday¹s EURALO call are now available at: https://community.icann.org/display/EURALO/EURALO+18.01.2011+Teleconference
You also find the summary minutes attached below.
-- Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond, PhD http://www.gih.com/ocl.html
_______________________________________________ EURO-Discuss mailing list EURO-Discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss
Homepage for the region: http://www.euralo.org