May 3, 2007
6:08 p.m.
As far as I can read in the agenda proposed by Nick, there is no voting tomorrow. There for I see no reason for further delay. We have already been discussing items and topics which were very clear and had enough timespan being read by everyone considering the EURALO kick-off in priority of some other work. I had also to organise myself in order to participate in what I consider being an important item in the agenda of *my daily work for the Internet community, listening to all and any Internet individual user.* rudi Jeanette Hofmann schreef: > Hi, > if it is indeed true that many ALs cannot participate tomorrow, it would > be good to restrain from taking binding decisions. > > As the decisions taken in Lisbon have shown, it can somewhat poison the > atmosphere if those physically present make decisions that don't reflect > the preferences of those absent. For this very reason, IETF working > groups don't vote in physical meetings or teleconferences, they use > mailing lists for polls and the like to ensure that all interested > parties have a chance to participate. > > jeanette > > > Nick Ashton-Hart wrote: > >> >From the email replies sent to the list, this time and date were the >> best - more people could do this time and date than any of the others >> - which is why we set it that way. >> >> If nobody else will propose an agenda, what I would suggest as a draft is: >> >> 1) Discuss and agree the list of candidates - including whether or not >> to include candidates who were proposed after the deadline. >> >> 2) Discuss and agree the total number of board seats for this election cycle. >> >> 3) Discuss and agree the length of the voting, the start date, and the >> provisional list of voters and the number of days for ALSes not on the >> call to provide their authorised voter. >> >> We would then bring the results of these items back to the list, not >> for review, but as decisions. >> >> I will put this up on the Wiki as the *DRAFT* agenda which all ALSes >> may then edit or extend - so we have something to start from. >> >> On 03/05/07, Annette Muehlberg <annette.muehlberg@web.de> wrote: >> >>> All, >>> concerning the tel conf tomorrow: Many people said they cannot take part (myself offered a different time, one and a half hours earlier). Rudi and myself asked what it is about, as no one proposed an agenda yet. I proposed to discuss all issues online. I guess, the best is, that those who actually have the chance in taking part come up with a proposal for procedure which will be presented to all of us online. >>> best >>> annette >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Rudi Vansnick schrieb: >>> >>>> This fits for me ... if at least we will have a clear agenda and no >>>> discussions about what is NOT written/signed in MoU and Bylaws. >>>> >>>> Rudi Vansnick >>>> Chair ISOC Belgium >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >> > > _______________________________________________ > EURO-Discuss mailing list > EURO-Discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org > http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss_atlarge-lists.icann.org > > >