Especially as this could always be extended if that were required... On 04/04/07, Vittorio Bertola <vb@bertola.eu> wrote:

All,

I see that the discussion is again getting polarized - with people stacking on the two extreme options.

Would the middle ground of April 22 be acceptable to everyone? So that we can close the discussion and start discussing nominations.

The only other option is to stick to the process agreed in Lisbon, which is the default if we can't agree to change it. But I really think that if we all are reasonable, then we can find a compromise that is good for everyone.

So, does anyone really object to April 22?

Thanks, -- vb. Vittorio Bertola - vb [a] bertola.eu <-------- --------> finally with a new website at http://bertola.eu/ <--------

_______________________________________________ EURO-Discuss mailing list EURO-Discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org

http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss_atlarge-lists.i...

-- -- Regards, Nick Ashton-Hart PO Box 32160 London N4 2XY United Kingdom UK Tel: +44 (20) 8800-1011 USA Tel: +1 (202) 657-5460 Fax: +44 (20) 7681-3135 mobile: +44 (7774) 932798 Win IM: ashtonhart@hotmail.com / AIM/iSight: nashtonhart@mac.com / Skype: nashtonhart Online Bio: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ashtonhart