All, to help everyone, I have spent 90 minutes preparing a renumbered and reformatted version of the EURALO Bylaws as adopted in Lisbon, so that we now have the three documents downloadable from the wiki at https://st.icann.org/euralo/index.cgi?ralo_organising_instruments (subject to verification by Nick, who has the master copy of the Bylaws). Hope this is useful. Regards, -- vb. Vittorio Bertola - vb [a] bertola.eu <-------- --------> finally with a new website at http://bertola.eu/ <--------
Thanks Vittorio four your 90 minutes. Good work. Helpful. wolfgang ________________________________ Von: euro-discuss-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org im Auftrag von Vittorio Bertola Gesendet: Sa 31.03.2007 20:28 An: Discussion for At-Large Europe Betreff: [EURO-Discuss] Documents All, to help everyone, I have spent 90 minutes preparing a renumbered and reformatted version of the EURALO Bylaws as adopted in Lisbon, so that we now have the three documents downloadable from the wiki at https://st.icann.org/euralo/index.cgi?ralo_organising_instruments (subject to verification by Nick, who has the master copy of the Bylaws). Hope this is useful. Regards, -- vb. Vittorio Bertola - vb [a] bertola.eu <-------- --------> finally with a new website at http://bertola.eu/ <-------- _______________________________________________ EURO-Discuss mailing list EURO-Discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss_atlarge-lists.i...
Wolfgang Kleinwächter ha scritto:
Thanks Vittorio four your 90 minutes. Good work. Helpful.
Thank you: I really would like to see this process converge, after four years. I would like to hear also from the other people - especially those that were in Lisbon - on whether they would prefer to stick to April 15 as the deadline for nominations, move it to May 1 as you proposed, or set it to April 22 as per my compromise proposal. I don't think it really makes a difference, so I would urge people to express an opinion but then accept whatever preference seems to be the most common. -- vb. Vittorio Bertola - vb [a] bertola.eu <-------- --------> finally with a new website at http://bertola.eu/ <--------
Vittorio Bertola wrote:
Wolfgang Kleinwächter ha scritto:
Thanks Vittorio four your 90 minutes. Good work. Helpful.
Thank you: I really would like to see this process converge, after four years.
I would like to hear also from the other people - especially those that were in Lisbon - on whether they would prefer to stick to April 15 as the deadline for nominations, move it to May 1 as you proposed, or set it to April 22 as per my compromise proposal. I don't think it really makes a difference, so I would urge people to express an opinion but then accept whatever preference seems to be the most common.
A good compromise would be April 22, that's my opinion. I still have to go through all other mails on the mailinglist, as I just got back at the office. Rudi Vansnick
Vittorio Bertola writes: I would like to hear also from the other people - especially those that were in Lisbon - on whether they would prefer to stick to April 15 as the deadline for nominations, move it to May 1 as you proposed, or set it to April 22 as per my compromise proposal. I don't think it really makes a difference, so I would urge people to express an opinion but then accept whatever preference seems to be the most common. ====== Dear all, We should have a look to the overall process. I try to list the different possibilities. ====== Solution 1 agreed at Lisbon meeting Nominations - 14 April Discussion of Nominations - 15 22 April Teleconferences to research consensus 23 29 April Elections (if needed) 1 5 May ====== Solution 2 Nominations - 22 April Discussion of Nominations - 23 30 April Teleconferences to research consensus 1 5 May Elections (if needed) 8 12 May ====== Solution 3 Nominations - 1 May Discussion of Nominations - 2 9 May Teleconferences to research consensus 10 16 May Elections (if needed) 18 22 May ====== I would prefer to stay on solution N°1 One of the reasons is that I will be in the US from 1 to 6 May with difficulty to be on line; But I agree with Patrick the more important question is to be sure that the process allows people to participate to the Puerto Rico meeting. All the best Sébastien Bachollet Président sebastien.bachollet@isoc.fr www.egeni.org www.isoc.fr -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 268.18.24/741 - Release Date: 31/03/2007 20:54
I prefer to stick to solution 1. Dessi
Vittorio Bertola writes: I would like to hear also from the other people - especially those that were in Lisbon - on whether they would prefer to stick to April 15 as the deadline for nominations, move it to May 1 as you proposed, or set it to April 22 as per my compromise proposal. I don't think it really makes a difference, so I would urge people to express an opinion but then accept whatever preference seems to be the most common.
====== Dear all, We should have a look to the overall process. I try to list the different possibilities. ====== Solution 1 agreed at Lisbon meeting Nominations - 14 April Discussion of Nominations - 15 – 22 April Teleconferences to research consensus 23 – 29 April Elections (if needed) 1 – 5 May
====== Solution 2 Nominations - 22 April Discussion of Nominations - 23 – 30 April Teleconferences to research consensus 1 – 5 May Elections (if needed) 8 – 12 May
====== Solution 3 Nominations - 1 May Discussion of Nominations - 2 – 9 May Teleconferences to research consensus 10 – 16 May Elections (if needed) 18 – 22 May
======
I prefer Solution 3. One personal reason is that I will be two weeks in a hospital from April 11 onwards and offline. Wolfgang . Sebastian: I would prefer to stay on solution N°1 One of the reasons is that I will be in the US from 1 to 6 May with difficulty to be on line;But I agree with Patrick the more important question is to be sure that the process allows people to participate to the Puerto Rico meeting. All the best Sébastien Bachollet Président sebastien.bachollet@isoc.fr www.egeni.org www.isoc.fr -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 268.18.24/741 - Release Date: 31/03/2007 20:54 _______________________________________________ EURO-Discuss mailing list EURO-Discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss_atlarge-lists.i...
Hello, I prefere solution 3 in case of the estern holidays. Kind Regards, Werner -- Werner Hülsmann Vorstandsmitglied der Deutschen Vereinigung für Datenschutz (DVD) e.V. Obere Laube 48 - D-78462 Konstanz Tel.: +49 7531 36590-56 - Mobil: +49 179 46 86 484 E-Mail: huelsmann@datenschutzverein.de - http://www.datenschutzverein.de Sébastien Bachollet schrieb:
Vittorio Bertola writes: I would like to hear also from the other people - especially those that were in Lisbon - on whether they would prefer to stick to April 15 as the deadline for nominations, move it to May 1 as you proposed, or set it to April 22 as per my compromise proposal. I don't think it really makes a difference, so I would urge people to express an opinion but then accept whatever preference seems to be the most common.
====== Dear all, We should have a look to the overall process. I try to list the different possibilities. ====== Solution 1 agreed at Lisbon meeting Nominations - 14 April Discussion of Nominations - 15 – 22 April Teleconferences to research consensus 23 – 29 April Elections (if needed) 1 – 5 May
====== Solution 2 Nominations - 22 April Discussion of Nominations - 23 – 30 April Teleconferences to research consensus 1 – 5 May Elections (if needed) 8 – 12 May
====== Solution 3 Nominations - 1 May Discussion of Nominations - 2 – 9 May Teleconferences to research consensus 10 – 16 May Elections (if needed) 18 – 22 May
====== I would prefer to stay on solution N°1 One of the reasons is that I will be in the US from 1 to 6 May with difficulty to be on line; But I agree with Patrick the more important question is to be sure that the process allows people to participate to the Puerto Rico meeting. All the best
Sébastien Bachollet Président sebastien.bachollet@isoc.fr www.egeni.org www.isoc.fr
Solution 1 is my preference. Rudi Vansnick /President Internet Society Belgium vzw Treasurer ISOC-ECC Barcelona-Spain Secretaris TIK vzw Peter Peterschapsprogramma Social Profit EROV/ GSM: +32 475 28 16 32 Tel: +32 70 77 39 39 ISOC Belgium <http://www.isoc.be/> - ISOC-ECC & ISOC.EU <http://www.isoc-ecc.org/> Sébastien Bachollet wrote:
Vittorio Bertola writes: I would like to hear also from the other people - especially those that were in Lisbon - on whether they would prefer to stick to April 15 as the deadline for nominations, move it to May 1 as you proposed, or set it to April 22 as per my compromise proposal. I don't think it really makes a difference, so I would urge people to express an opinion but then accept whatever preference seems to be the most common.
====== Dear all, We should have a look to the overall process. I try to list the different possibilities. ====== Solution 1 agreed at Lisbon meeting Nominations - 14 April Discussion of Nominations - 15 – 22 April Teleconferences to research consensus 23 – 29 April Elections (if needed) 1 – 5 May
====== Solution 2 Nominations - 22 April Discussion of Nominations - 23 – 30 April Teleconferences to research consensus 1 – 5 May Elections (if needed) 8 – 12 May
====== Solution 3 Nominations - 1 May Discussion of Nominations - 2 – 9 May Teleconferences to research consensus 10 – 16 May Elections (if needed) 18 – 22 May
====== I would prefer to stay on solution N°1 One of the reasons is that I will be in the US from 1 to 6 May with difficulty to be on line; But I agree with Patrick the more important question is to be sure that the process allows people to participate to the Puerto Rico meeting. All the best
Sébastien Bachollet Président sebastien.bachollet@isoc.fr www.egeni.org www.isoc.fr
Solution 3 brings us too close to the Puerto Rico meeting. So, for me: Solution 1 is best Solution 2 is still workable Patrick Sébastien Bachollet wrote:
Vittorio Bertola writes: I would like to hear also from the other people - especially those that were in Lisbon - on whether they would prefer to stick to April 15 as the deadline for nominations, move it to May 1 as you proposed, or set it to April 22 as per my compromise proposal. I don't think it really makes a difference, so I would urge people to express an opinion but then accept whatever preference seems to be the most common.
====== Dear all, We should have a look to the overall process. I try to list the different possibilities. ====== Solution 1 agreed at Lisbon meeting Nominations - 14 April Discussion of Nominations - 15 – 22 April Teleconferences to research consensus 23 – 29 April Elections (if needed) 1 – 5 May
====== Solution 2 Nominations - 22 April Discussion of Nominations - 23 – 30 April Teleconferences to research consensus 1 – 5 May Elections (if needed) 8 – 12 May
====== Solution 3 Nominations - 1 May Discussion of Nominations - 2 – 9 May Teleconferences to research consensus 10 – 16 May Elections (if needed) 18 – 22 May
====== I would prefer to stay on solution N°1 One of the reasons is that I will be in the US from 1 to 6 May with difficulty to be on line; But I agree with Patrick the more important question is to be sure that the process allows people to participate to the Puerto Rico meeting. All the best
Sébastien Bachollet Président sebastien.bachollet@isoc.fr www.egeni.org www.isoc.fr
participants (7)
-
"Werner Hülsmann - DVD e.V." -
Dessi Pefeva -
Patrick Vande Walle -
Rudi Vansnick -
Sébastien Bachollet -
Vittorio Bertola -
Wolfgang Kleinwächter