Dear All .. Reference to the above mentioned subject and the attached document, appreciate your feedback on the following: 1. Do you agree to the mentioned objectives, expectations and options to be considered, or do you still have any comments? 2. We have 6 options to discuss and work out their pros and cons (those may increase to 7 should we decide to move 'secretariats coordination' from PDP to Day-to-Day) and around 3 remaining weeks, how would like to have those discussed .. Should we discuss all options at once? Should we discuss 2 options/week? Other suggestions? Jonathan, appreciate letting me know if I have overlooked any of the points that is meant to structure our online discussion on this work track .. Looking forward to receiving your earliest feedback on the above couple of administrative issues in order to start discussing the substance .. Kind Regards --Manal From: gac-gnso-cg-bounces@icann.org [mailto:gac-gnso-cg-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Manal Ismail Sent: Monday, February 24, 2014 8:07 PM To: gac-gnso-cg@icann.org Subject: [Gac-gnso-cg] Agenda for Tues. Feb. 25th cc .. Dear All .. Please find below the suggested agenda for tomorrow's conference call .. 1. Day-to-day work track (Working document prepared by Marika and Olof - Version circulated by Marika on Feb. 20th, 2014) 2. PDP work track (Working document prepared by Mikey and Suzanne - Version circulated by Mikey on Feb. 20th, 2014) 3. Agree on material ready to be shared in preparation for Singapore o Active GNSO WGs (attached) o Mechanism for day-to-day co-operation (attached version - with unpopulated table) 4. Agree on expectations from both work tracks for the following call (Note: Next call scheduled for 11 March 2014, 14h00 UTC) 5. AOB All referenced documents are attached for your convenience .. Kind Regards --Manal