OK thanks Suzanne. Your edits definitely improve the document so definitely a case of better late than never. When do you think you can get the additional thoughts on the PDP track or are those not a condition for finalising the briefing? Looking at your note below, I suspect that they are intended for the presentation to be delivered in London. Am I correct? Key point is to get the briefing out ASAP i.e. sufficiently ahead of London. Jonathan. From: Suzanne Radell [mailto:SRadell@ntia.doc.gov] Sent: 02 June 2014 19:31 To: Jonathan Robinson; GAC-GNSO-CG@icann.org Subject: RE: [Gac-gnso-cg] Final Briefing Note Importance: High Thanks, Jonathan, and apologies to all for not getting these suggested edits in sooner; I hope they can be taken into account. The edits relate to the survey, which I have understood as an important first step in determining whether the existing/current means by which GAC members are informed about upcoming PDPs at the initial stage has value/utility or needs to be reconsidered. It has been my impression that we intended to emphasize the importance of getting feedback on this stage from the GAC during our exchange in London. I have some additional thoughts to share on the presentation of the PDP portion of our work and will do so separately. Thanks, Suz From: gac-gnso-cg-bounces@icann.org [mailto:gac-gnso-cg-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Robinson Sent: Monday, June 02, 2014 12:44 PM To: GAC-GNSO-CG@icann.org Subject: [Gac-gnso-cg] Final Briefing Note All, I have revised the briefing note to accommodate suggested changes / inputs. Some of the comments suggestions pertained more to our work as a group so we need to pick that up on list or in our meetings. Please see attached the final version in word (in case last-minute changes are needed) and in PDF (for distribution) formats. Thanks, Jonathan