Survey on additional engagement mechanisms and experience with QLM ..
Dear All .. We had a quick meeting in Marrakech, Jonathan, Mason, Marika, Olof and myself to discuss how we can move things forward and drive our discussions to conclusion(s) .. We agreed to have a survey to solicit further input from the GNSO and the GAC on possible additional engagement mechanisms as well as the experiences to date with the QLM .. Marika has led staff efforts to prepare this survey<http://www.surveymonkey.com/r/KKK7SDQ?sm=XP5GDzKVq36cwizrleP9Te1XgJcj3%2fGLU...> .. We would like to hear your views before sharing with the GNSO and the GAC .. Kind Regards --Manal Manal Ismail Executive Director, International Technical Coordination National Telecom Regulatory Authority of Egypt (NTRA) Tel: +202 3534 1115 Fax: +202 3534 4155 Email: manal@tra.gov.eg<mailto:manal@tra.gov.eg>
Dear Manal, is good to hear from you and I hope all is well on your side!!! I would suggest to bring up some more pointed questions between “#5 - Further Comments” and #6 (for GAC respondents), to try to measure impact of the effort a little deeper and promote more concrete comments, something like “Has the past experience with the quick look mechanism # helped you to explain to your Principals and other national stakeholders the relevance of the policies to be developed? ## helped to increase the interest from your Government and/or other national stakeholders in the ICANN Policy development process? ### helped to increase resources your Government plans to dedicate to ICANN (time, staff research) in the future for the upcoming policy cycles #### are you following regularly the calls and meetings of those 3 PDPs? Or any other WGs? ##### any other suggestions on how to enhance collaboration……(as per #6) I guess the questions can be drafted carefully and I would expect some deeper comments or initiatives. Best warm regards Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez +506 8837 7176 Skype: carlos.raulg Current UTC offset: -6.00 (Costa Rica) On 27 Apr 2016, at 7:55, Manal Ismail wrote:
Dear All ..
We had a quick meeting in Marrakech, Jonathan, Mason, Marika, Olof and myself to discuss how we can move things forward and drive our discussions to conclusion(s) .. We agreed to have a survey to solicit further input from the GNSO and the GAC on possible additional engagement mechanisms as well as the experiences to date with the QLM .. Marika has led staff efforts to prepare this survey<http://www.surveymonkey.com/r/KKK7SDQ?sm=XP5GDzKVq36cwizrleP9Te1XgJcj3%2fGLU...> .. We would like to hear your views before sharing with the GNSO and the GAC ..
Kind Regards --Manal
Manal Ismail Executive Director, International Technical Coordination National Telecom Regulatory Authority of Egypt (NTRA) Tel: +202 3534 1115 Fax: +202 3534 4155 Email: manal@tra.gov.eg<mailto:manal@tra.gov.eg>
_______________________________________________ Gac-gnso-cg mailing list Gac-gnso-cg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gac-gnso-cg
Dear Manal, dear Carlos and all Some quick comments from my side: · In general, I find the idea of the survey an excellent one · I agree with the intention of Carlos’ comments (obtain more specific feedback from GAC) · I would also include questions to GNSO participants about their specific experience with GAC inputs during the QLM until now (are they aware of them? Were they helpful? Do they know how to act if they have follow-up questions?...) · As to the explanations included in the survey, I feel many GAC members may still be unfamiliar with many of the concepts used (and long textual explanations, where one has to specifically click-through are probably not very helpful). Therefore, in order to reach out to as many GAC members as possible, I would suggest the following: o first, that more visual elements are included, where, for instance, the QLM is put in a visual context of the whole PDP process. GAC members should be made aware of the limited scope of the QLM and that the PDP process is a much longer exercise; o second, I feel that the specific experience had so far should also be shortly and concisely explained within the survey itself in order to exemplify the concrete impact of the QLM up to now (“we have had the following specific PDPs so far, where GAC inputs in the QLM were given… these inputs were then reflected in this or that working doc, etc. – visual elements would again be helpful) Hope this helps Best Jorge -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: gac-gnso-cg-bounces@icann.org [mailto:gac-gnso-cg-bounces@icann.org] Im Auftrag von Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez G. Gesendet: Mittwoch, 27. April 2016 20:04 An: Manal Ismail <manal@tra.gov.eg> Cc: gac-gnso-cg@icann.org Betreff: Re: [Gac-gnso-cg] Survey on additional engagement mechanisms and experience with QLM .. Dear Manal, is good to hear from you and I hope all is well on your side!!! I would suggest to bring up some more pointed questions between “#5 - Further Comments” and #6 (for GAC respondents), to try to measure impact of the effort a little deeper and promote more concrete comments, something like “Has the past experience with the quick look mechanism # helped you to explain to your Principals and other national stakeholders the relevance of the policies to be developed? ## helped to increase the interest from your Government and/or other national stakeholders in the ICANN Policy development process? ### helped to increase resources your Government plans to dedicate to ICANN (time, staff research) in the future for the upcoming policy cycles #### are you following regularly the calls and meetings of those 3 PDPs? Or any other WGs? ##### any other suggestions on how to enhance collaboration……(as per #6) I guess the questions can be drafted carefully and I would expect some deeper comments or initiatives. Best warm regards Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez +506 8837 7176 Skype: carlos.raulg Current UTC offset: -6.00 (Costa Rica) On 27 Apr 2016, at 7:55, Manal Ismail wrote:
Dear All ..
We had a quick meeting in Marrakech, Jonathan, Mason, Marika, Olof and
myself to discuss how we can move things forward and drive our
discussions to conclusion(s) ..
We agreed to have a survey to solicit further input from the GNSO and
the GAC on possible additional engagement mechanisms as well as the
experiences to date with the QLM ..
Marika has led staff efforts to prepare this
survey<http://www.surveymonkey.com/r/KKK7SDQ?sm=XP5GDzKVq36cwizrleP9Te
1XgJcj3%2fGLUuyLF6dQ%2fuYxzA6yve5BMjs%2fzzO3nRx4hF5H0a%2bX%2fXq3nTYJeh
VNGNQcFn6wHZiOhG9I2q4ssmw%3d>
..
We would like to hear your views before sharing with the GNSO and the
GAC ..
Kind Regards
--Manal
Manal Ismail
Executive Director, International Technical Coordination National
Telecom Regulatory Authority of Egypt (NTRA)
Tel: +202 3534 1115
Fax: +202 3534 4155
Email: manal@tra.gov.eg<mailto:manal@tra.gov.eg<mailto:manal@tra.gov.eg%3cmailto:manal@tra.gov.eg>>
_______________________________________________
Gac-gnso-cg mailing list
Gac-gnso-cg@icann.org<mailto:Gac-gnso-cg@icann.org>
_______________________________________________ Gac-gnso-cg mailing list Gac-gnso-cg@icann.org<mailto:Gac-gnso-cg@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gac-gnso-cg
Thanks a million Carlos and Jorge for your prompt and valuable comments !! Although the shortness and flexibility of the survey were intended, I take your points that referencing specific experiences, using visual elements and adding more pointed questions to both the GAC and the GNSO may better serve the purpose of the survey .. Do other colleagues agree? Any further comments? Marika, can you kindly lead the efforts again to reflect the feedback received, and circulate an updated version .. Kind Regards --Manal From: Jorge.Cancio@bakom.admin.ch [mailto:Jorge.Cancio@bakom.admin.ch] Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2016 9:43 AM To: crg@isoc-cr.org; Manal Ismail Cc: gac-gnso-cg@icann.org Subject: AW: [Gac-gnso-cg] Survey on additional engagement mechanisms and experience with QLM .. Dear Manal, dear Carlos and all Some quick comments from my side: • In general, I find the idea of the survey an excellent one • I agree with the intention of Carlos’ comments (obtain more specific feedback from GAC) • I would also include questions to GNSO participants about their specific experience with GAC inputs during the QLM until now (are they aware of them? Were they helpful? Do they know how to act if they have follow-up questions?...) • As to the explanations included in the survey, I feel many GAC members may still be unfamiliar with many of the concepts used (and long textual explanations, where one has to specifically click-through are probably not very helpful). Therefore, in order to reach out to as many GAC members as possible, I would suggest the following: o first, that more visual elements are included, where, for instance, the QLM is put in a visual context of the whole PDP process. GAC members should be made aware of the limited scope of the QLM and that the PDP process is a much longer exercise; o second, I feel that the specific experience had so far should also be shortly and concisely explained within the survey itself in order to exemplify the concrete impact of the QLM up to now (“we have had the following specific PDPs so far, where GAC inputs in the QLM were given… these inputs were then reflected in this or that working doc, etc. – visual elements would again be helpful) Hope this helps Best Jorge -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: gac-gnso-cg-bounces@icann.org<mailto:gac-gnso-cg-bounces@icann.org> [mailto:gac-gnso-cg-bounces@icann.org] Im Auftrag von Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez G. Gesendet: Mittwoch, 27. April 2016 20:04 An: Manal Ismail <manal@tra.gov.eg<mailto:manal@tra.gov.eg>> Cc: gac-gnso-cg@icann.org<mailto:gac-gnso-cg@icann.org> Betreff: Re: [Gac-gnso-cg] Survey on additional engagement mechanisms and experience with QLM .. Dear Manal, is good to hear from you and I hope all is well on your side!!! I would suggest to bring up some more pointed questions between “#5 - Further Comments” and #6 (for GAC respondents), to try to measure impact of the effort a little deeper and promote more concrete comments, something like “Has the past experience with the quick look mechanism # helped you to explain to your Principals and other national stakeholders the relevance of the policies to be developed? ## helped to increase the interest from your Government and/or other national stakeholders in the ICANN Policy development process? ### helped to increase resources your Government plans to dedicate to ICANN (time, staff research) in the future for the upcoming policy cycles #### are you following regularly the calls and meetings of those 3 PDPs? Or any other WGs? ##### any other suggestions on how to enhance collaboration……(as per #6) I guess the questions can be drafted carefully and I would expect some deeper comments or initiatives. Best warm regards Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez +506 8837 7176 Skype: carlos.raulg Current UTC offset: -6.00 (Costa Rica) On 27 Apr 2016, at 7:55, Manal Ismail wrote:
Dear All ..
We had a quick meeting in Marrakech, Jonathan, Mason, Marika, Olof and
myself to discuss how we can move things forward and drive our
discussions to conclusion(s) ..
We agreed to have a survey to solicit further input from the GNSO and
the GAC on possible additional engagement mechanisms as well as the
experiences to date with the QLM ..
Marika has led staff efforts to prepare this
survey<http://www.surveymonkey.com/r/KKK7SDQ?sm=XP5GDzKVq36cwizrleP9Te
1XgJcj3%2fGLUuyLF6dQ%2fuYxzA6yve5BMjs%2fzzO3nRx4hF5H0a%2bX%2fXq3nTYJeh
VNGNQcFn6wHZiOhG9I2q4ssmw%3d>
..
We would like to hear your views before sharing with the GNSO and the
GAC ..
Kind Regards
--Manal
Manal Ismail
Executive Director, International Technical Coordination National
Telecom Regulatory Authority of Egypt (NTRA)
Tel: +202 3534 1115
Fax: +202 3534 4155
Email: manal@tra.gov.eg<mailto:manal@tra.gov.eg<mailto:manal@tra.gov.eg%3cmailto:manal@tra.gov.eg>>
_______________________________________________
Gac-gnso-cg mailing list
Gac-gnso-cg@icann.org<mailto:Gac-gnso-cg@icann.org>
_______________________________________________ Gac-gnso-cg mailing list Gac-gnso-cg@icann.org<mailto:Gac-gnso-cg@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gac-gnso-cg
Dear Carlos, I have some comments to the questions you suggest to add. The CG wants to measure how useful the Quick Look Mechanism has been. Other considerations, such as consultation with stakeholders back home, resources devoted by national administrations to ICANN participation, the level of commitment of respondent in PDPs or WG... are not the aim of the Consultation Group and could be better addressed in other contexts. Best regards, Gema Campillos Glez -----Mensaje original----- De: gac-gnso-cg-bounces@icann.org [mailto:gac-gnso-cg-bounces@icann.org] En nombre de Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez G. Enviado el: miércoles, 27 de abril de 2016 20:04 Para: Manal Ismail CC: gac-gnso-cg@icann.org Asunto: Re: [Gac-gnso-cg] Survey on additional engagement mechanisms and experience with QLM .. Dear Manal, is good to hear from you and I hope all is well on your side!!! I would suggest to bring up some more pointed questions between “#5 - Further Comments” and #6 (for GAC respondents), to try to measure impact of the effort a little deeper and promote more concrete comments, something like “Has the past experience with the quick look mechanism # helped you to explain to your Principals and other national stakeholders the relevance of the policies to be developed? ## helped to increase the interest from your Government and/or other national stakeholders in the ICANN Policy development process? ### helped to increase resources your Government plans to dedicate to ICANN (time, staff research) in the future for the upcoming policy cycles #### are you following regularly the calls and meetings of those 3 PDPs? Or any other WGs? ##### any other suggestions on how to enhance collaboration……(as per #6) I guess the questions can be drafted carefully and I would expect some deeper comments or initiatives. Best warm regards Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez +506 8837 7176 Skype: carlos.raulg Current UTC offset: -6.00 (Costa Rica) On 27 Apr 2016, at 7:55, Manal Ismail wrote:
Dear All ..
We had a quick meeting in Marrakech, Jonathan, Mason, Marika, Olof and myself to discuss how we can move things forward and drive our discussions to conclusion(s) .. We agreed to have a survey to solicit further input from the GNSO and the GAC on possible additional engagement mechanisms as well as the experiences to date with the QLM .. Marika has led staff efforts to prepare this survey<http://www.surveymonkey.com/r/KKK7SDQ?sm=XP5GDzKVq36cwizrleP9Te 1XgJcj3%2fGLUuyLF6dQ%2fuYxzA6yve5BMjs%2fzzO3nRx4hF5H0a%2bX%2fXq3nTYJeh VNGNQcFn6wHZiOhG9I2q4ssmw%3d> .. We would like to hear your views before sharing with the GNSO and the GAC ..
Kind Regards --Manal
Manal Ismail Executive Director, International Technical Coordination National Telecom Regulatory Authority of Egypt (NTRA) Tel: +202 3534 1115 Fax: +202 3534 4155 Email: manal@tra.gov.eg<mailto:manal@tra.gov.eg>
_______________________________________________ Gac-gnso-cg mailing list Gac-gnso-cg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gac-gnso-cg
Gac-gnso-cg mailing list Gac-gnso-cg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gac-gnso-cg
Thanks Gema .. I see your point and don't think we should be forcing answers or requesting a binary answer to any of those questions .. By the way, we agreed to have no mandatory questions .. so respondents can choose to answer some or all of the questions .. Anyway, let me try to suggest this .. Would it be acceptable to you, Carlos and other colleagues if we just mention those points between brackets in “#5 - Further Comments”, as examples of further comments GAC members may wish to share; and leave it up to each and every member to comment on those points, other points, or leave the whole box empty ? Kind Regards --Manal -----Original Message----- From: Campillos Gonzalez, Gema Maria [mailto:GCAMPILLOS@minetur.es] Sent: Friday, April 29, 2016 6:48 PM To: Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez G.; Manal Ismail Cc: gac-gnso-cg@icann.org Subject: RE: [Gac-gnso-cg] Survey on additional engagement mechanisms and experience with QLM .. Dear Carlos, I have some comments to the questions you suggest to add. The CG wants to measure how useful the Quick Look Mechanism has been. Other considerations, such as consultation with stakeholders back home, resources devoted by national administrations to ICANN participation, the level of commitment of respondent in PDPs or WG... are not the aim of the Consultation Group and could be better addressed in other contexts. Best regards, Gema Campillos Glez -----Mensaje original----- De: gac-gnso-cg-bounces@icann.org [mailto:gac-gnso-cg-bounces@icann.org] En nombre de Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez G. Enviado el: miércoles, 27 de abril de 2016 20:04 Para: Manal Ismail CC: gac-gnso-cg@icann.org Asunto: Re: [Gac-gnso-cg] Survey on additional engagement mechanisms and experience with QLM .. Dear Manal, is good to hear from you and I hope all is well on your side!!! I would suggest to bring up some more pointed questions between “#5 - Further Comments” and #6 (for GAC respondents), to try to measure impact of the effort a little deeper and promote more concrete comments, something like “Has the past experience with the quick look mechanism # helped you to explain to your Principals and other national stakeholders the relevance of the policies to be developed? ## helped to increase the interest from your Government and/or other national stakeholders in the ICANN Policy development process? ### helped to increase resources your Government plans to dedicate to ICANN (time, staff research) in the future for the upcoming policy cycles #### are you following regularly the calls and meetings of those 3 PDPs? Or any other WGs? ##### any other suggestions on how to enhance collaboration……(as per #6) I guess the questions can be drafted carefully and I would expect some deeper comments or initiatives. Best warm regards Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez +506 8837 7176 Skype: carlos.raulg Current UTC offset: -6.00 (Costa Rica) On 27 Apr 2016, at 7:55, Manal Ismail wrote:
Dear All ..
We had a quick meeting in Marrakech, Jonathan, Mason, Marika, Olof and myself to discuss how we can move things forward and drive our discussions to conclusion(s) .. We agreed to have a survey to solicit further input from the GNSO and the GAC on possible additional engagement mechanisms as well as the experiences to date with the QLM .. Marika has led staff efforts to prepare this survey<http://www.surveymonkey.com/r/KKK7SDQ?sm=XP5GDzKVq36cwizrleP9Te 1XgJcj3%2fGLUuyLF6dQ%2fuYxzA6yve5BMjs%2fzzO3nRx4hF5H0a%2bX%2fXq3nTYJeh VNGNQcFn6wHZiOhG9I2q4ssmw%3d> .. We would like to hear your views before sharing with the GNSO and the GAC ..
Kind Regards --Manal
Manal Ismail Executive Director, International Technical Coordination National Telecom Regulatory Authority of Egypt (NTRA) Tel: +202 3534 1115 Fax: +202 3534 4155 Email: manal@tra.gov.eg<mailto:manal@tra.gov.eg>
_______________________________________________ Gac-gnso-cg mailing list Gac-gnso-cg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gac-gnso-cg
Gac-gnso-cg mailing list Gac-gnso-cg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gac-gnso-cg
Thank you for the response, Manal. I would leave the whole box empty. Regards, Gema -----Mensaje original----- De: Manal Ismail [mailto:manal@tra.gov.eg] Enviado el: miércoles, 04 de mayo de 2016 10:42 Para: Campillos Gonzalez, Gema Maria; Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez G. CC: gac-gnso-cg@icann.org Asunto: RE: [Gac-gnso-cg] Survey on additional engagement mechanisms and experience with QLM .. Thanks Gema .. I see your point and don't think we should be forcing answers or requesting a binary answer to any of those questions .. By the way, we agreed to have no mandatory questions .. so respondents can choose to answer some or all of the questions .. Anyway, let me try to suggest this .. Would it be acceptable to you, Carlos and other colleagues if we just mention those points between brackets in “#5 - Further Comments”, as examples of further comments GAC members may wish to share; and leave it up to each and every member to comment on those points, other points, or leave the whole box empty ? Kind Regards --Manal -----Original Message----- From: Campillos Gonzalez, Gema Maria [mailto:GCAMPILLOS@minetur.es] Sent: Friday, April 29, 2016 6:48 PM To: Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez G.; Manal Ismail Cc: gac-gnso-cg@icann.org Subject: RE: [Gac-gnso-cg] Survey on additional engagement mechanisms and experience with QLM .. Dear Carlos, I have some comments to the questions you suggest to add. The CG wants to measure how useful the Quick Look Mechanism has been. Other considerations, such as consultation with stakeholders back home, resources devoted by national administrations to ICANN participation, the level of commitment of respondent in PDPs or WG... are not the aim of the Consultation Group and could be better addressed in other contexts. Best regards, Gema Campillos Glez -----Mensaje original----- De: gac-gnso-cg-bounces@icann.org [mailto:gac-gnso-cg-bounces@icann.org] En nombre de Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez G. Enviado el: miércoles, 27 de abril de 2016 20:04 Para: Manal Ismail CC: gac-gnso-cg@icann.org Asunto: Re: [Gac-gnso-cg] Survey on additional engagement mechanisms and experience with QLM .. Dear Manal, is good to hear from you and I hope all is well on your side!!! I would suggest to bring up some more pointed questions between “#5 - Further Comments” and #6 (for GAC respondents), to try to measure impact of the effort a little deeper and promote more concrete comments, something like “Has the past experience with the quick look mechanism # helped you to explain to your Principals and other national stakeholders the relevance of the policies to be developed? ## helped to increase the interest from your Government and/or other national stakeholders in the ICANN Policy development process? ### helped to increase resources your Government plans to dedicate to ICANN (time, staff research) in the future for the upcoming policy cycles #### are you following regularly the calls and meetings of those 3 PDPs? Or any other WGs? ##### any other suggestions on how to enhance collaboration……(as per #6) I guess the questions can be drafted carefully and I would expect some deeper comments or initiatives. Best warm regards Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez +506 8837 7176 Skype: carlos.raulg Current UTC offset: -6.00 (Costa Rica) On 27 Apr 2016, at 7:55, Manal Ismail wrote:
Dear All ..
We had a quick meeting in Marrakech, Jonathan, Mason, Marika, Olof and myself to discuss how we can move things forward and drive our discussions to conclusion(s) .. We agreed to have a survey to solicit further input from the GNSO and the GAC on possible additional engagement mechanisms as well as the experiences to date with the QLM .. Marika has led staff efforts to prepare this survey<http://www.surveymonkey.com/r/KKK7SDQ?sm=XP5GDzKVq36cwizrleP9Te 1XgJcj3%2fGLUuyLF6dQ%2fuYxzA6yve5BMjs%2fzzO3nRx4hF5H0a%2bX%2fXq3nTYJeh VNGNQcFn6wHZiOhG9I2q4ssmw%3d> .. We would like to hear your views before sharing with the GNSO and the GAC ..
Kind Regards --Manal
Manal Ismail Executive Director, International Technical Coordination National Telecom Regulatory Authority of Egypt (NTRA) Tel: +202 3534 1115 Fax: +202 3534 4155 Email: manal@tra.gov.eg<mailto:manal@tra.gov.eg>
_______________________________________________ Gac-gnso-cg mailing list Gac-gnso-cg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gac-gnso-cg
Gac-gnso-cg mailing list Gac-gnso-cg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gac-gnso-cg
Dear All, Following your comments and suggestions, please find hereby an updated version of the survey for your review: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/Preview/?sm=XP5GDzKVq36cwizrleP9TWkfHHePzQqiP yv6lsUN8_2FIE4ZXbG7LBmXuq11Mn9oMw <https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/Preview/?sm=XP5GDzKVq36cwizrleP9TWkfHHePzQqi Pyv6lsUN8_2FIE4ZXbG7LBmXuq11Mn9oMw> . We hope this updated version addresses the input received. If you have any further comments, please share these by Tuesday 10 May at the latest. Following that we would like to share the survey with the GNSO and GAC for their input. Best regards, Marika From: <gac-gnso-cg-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of "manal@tra.gov.eg" <manal@tra.gov.eg> Date: Wednesday 27 April 2016 at 15:55 To: "gac-gnso-cg@icann.org" <gac-gnso-cg@icann.org> Subject: [Gac-gnso-cg] Survey on additional engagement mechanisms and experience with QLM .. Dear All .. We had a quick meeting in Marrakech, Jonathan, Mason, Marika, Olof and myself to discuss how we can move things forward and drive our discussions to conclusion(s) .. We agreed to have a survey to solicit further input from the GNSO and the GAC on possible additional engagement mechanisms as well as the experiences to date with the QLM .. Marika has led staff efforts to prepare this survey <http://www.surveymonkey.com/r/KKK7SDQ?sm=XP5GDzKVq36cwizrleP9Te1XgJcj3%2fGL UuyLF6dQ%2fuYxzA6yve5BMjs%2fzzO3nRx4hF5H0a%2bX%2fXq3nTYJehVNGNQcFn6wHZiOhG9I 2q4ssmw%3d> .. We would like to hear your views before sharing with the GNSO and the GAC .. Kind Regards --Manal Manal Ismail Executive Director, International Technical Coordination National Telecom Regulatory Authority of Egypt (NTRA) Tel: +202 3534 1115 Fax: +202 3534 4155 Email: manal@tra.gov.eg <mailto:manal@tra.gov.eg>
participants (5)
-
Campillos Gonzalez, Gema Maria -
Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez G. -
Jorge.Cancio＠bakom.admin.ch -
Manal Ismail -
Marika Konings