Dear Carlos, I have some comments to the questions you suggest to add. The CG wants to measure how useful the Quick Look Mechanism has been. Other considerations, such as consultation with stakeholders back home, resources devoted by national administrations to ICANN participation, the level of commitment of respondent in PDPs or WG... are not the aim of the Consultation Group and could be better addressed in other contexts. Best regards, Gema Campillos Glez -----Mensaje original----- De: gac-gnso-cg-bounces@icann.org [mailto:gac-gnso-cg-bounces@icann.org] En nombre de Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez G. Enviado el: miércoles, 27 de abril de 2016 20:04 Para: Manal Ismail CC: gac-gnso-cg@icann.org Asunto: Re: [Gac-gnso-cg] Survey on additional engagement mechanisms and experience with QLM .. Dear Manal, is good to hear from you and I hope all is well on your side!!! I would suggest to bring up some more pointed questions between “#5 - Further Comments” and #6 (for GAC respondents), to try to measure impact of the effort a little deeper and promote more concrete comments, something like “Has the past experience with the quick look mechanism # helped you to explain to your Principals and other national stakeholders the relevance of the policies to be developed? ## helped to increase the interest from your Government and/or other national stakeholders in the ICANN Policy development process? ### helped to increase resources your Government plans to dedicate to ICANN (time, staff research) in the future for the upcoming policy cycles #### are you following regularly the calls and meetings of those 3 PDPs? Or any other WGs? ##### any other suggestions on how to enhance collaboration……(as per #6) I guess the questions can be drafted carefully and I would expect some deeper comments or initiatives. Best warm regards Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez +506 8837 7176 Skype: carlos.raulg Current UTC offset: -6.00 (Costa Rica) On 27 Apr 2016, at 7:55, Manal Ismail wrote:
Dear All ..
We had a quick meeting in Marrakech, Jonathan, Mason, Marika, Olof and myself to discuss how we can move things forward and drive our discussions to conclusion(s) .. We agreed to have a survey to solicit further input from the GNSO and the GAC on possible additional engagement mechanisms as well as the experiences to date with the QLM .. Marika has led staff efforts to prepare this survey<http://www.surveymonkey.com/r/KKK7SDQ?sm=XP5GDzKVq36cwizrleP9Te 1XgJcj3%2fGLUuyLF6dQ%2fuYxzA6yve5BMjs%2fzzO3nRx4hF5H0a%2bX%2fXq3nTYJeh VNGNQcFn6wHZiOhG9I2q4ssmw%3d> .. We would like to hear your views before sharing with the GNSO and the GAC ..
Kind Regards --Manal
Manal Ismail Executive Director, International Technical Coordination National Telecom Regulatory Authority of Egypt (NTRA) Tel: +202 3534 1115 Fax: +202 3534 4155 Email: manal@tra.gov.eg<mailto:manal@tra.gov.eg>
_______________________________________________ Gac-gnso-cg mailing list Gac-gnso-cg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gac-gnso-cg
Gac-gnso-cg mailing list Gac-gnso-cg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gac-gnso-cg