Re: [Gac-gnso-cg] Please participate - doodle poll & notes from today'smeeting
Many thanks Marika .. Can you please add 'leadership regular interaction' to the second bullet of the Day-to-day mechanism, to read: * Also consider joint meetings/leadership regular interaction and possible ideas for improvement Kind Regards --Manal From: gac-gnso-cg-bounces@icann.org [mailto:gac-gnso-cg-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Marika Konings Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 6:06 PM To: gac-gnso-cg@icann.org Subject: [Gac-gnso-cg] Please participate - doodle poll & notes from today'smeeting Dear All, Please find below the notes / action items from today's meeting. In order to determine expected participation during the next calls scheduled in July and August, please complete the following doodle poll: http://doodle.com/e7tms8g47xd6gzcm. Thanks, Marika Action items / notes 15/7 meeting: * Remind members of call schedule and need to participate in meetings GNSO Liaison to the GAC * Agree timetable for appointment - also taking into account travel planning for LA meeting * Update to be provided to GAC during their meeting on 31 July / 1 August on status of appointment Liaison support * Will follow appointment of liaison * Will need to managed properly to ensure that expectations are met * Possible setting up mailing list following appointment of GNSO liaison to the GAC to allow for conversation - further consider what other or additional mechanisms may be needed * Serve as a resource to GNSO liaison to the GAC * GAC focus expected to be on those items that affect or potentially affect public policy GAC members survey * Consider extending deadline to the beginning of next month, incentivise participation and send another reminder * Consider other mechanisms to obtain input * Liaison could also provide regular updates or flag certain issues that may be of interest * Share results received so far with the GAC mailing list Work plan between now and LA * Consider maintaining same frequency for meetings (every two weeks), with team leads meetings in the weeks in between. Does there need to be a pauze for vacation time? * No team lead calls for now, but use mailing list and schedule ad-hoc calls as needed * Staff to conduct a doodle poll for meetings throughout July and August to determine availability of CG members Day-to-day mechanism * Go ahead with current pilots (GNSO liaison and group of liaisons) and determine effect of those before moving forward with other items. * Also consider joint meetings and possible ideas for improvement PDP Work Track * Amr to connect with Suzanne * GAC to look into some of the ideas that were suggested in London such as triage committee * Review slides from London meeting AOB * Is CG the right mechanism to look into hot topics? - probaby not, this group is focused on process not substance * Issues may guide conversations as use cases
Thanks, Manal, I've updated this in the notes that have been posted on the wiki (see https://community.icann.org/x/2bjhAg). In doing so, I also realised that there was something missing from one of the other bullet points regarding the survey and have updated as follows: Share results received so far with the GAC mailing list (not full survey results, but number of participants and relatively limited input provided to date to inspire additional responses). Best regards, Marika From: Manal Ismail <manal@tra.gov.eg> Date: Wednesday 16 July 2014 02:18 To: Marika Konings <marika.konings@icann.org>, "gac-gnso-cg@icann.org" <gac-gnso-cg@icann.org> Subject: RE: [Gac-gnso-cg] Please participate - doodle poll & notes from today'smeeting Many thanks Marika .. Can you please add leadership regular interaction¹ to the second bullet of the Day-to-day mechanism, to read: * Also consider joint meetings/leadership regular interaction and possible ideas for improvement Kind Regards --Manal From: gac-gnso-cg-bounces@icann.org [mailto:gac-gnso-cg-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Marika Konings Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 6:06 PM To: gac-gnso-cg@icann.org Subject: [Gac-gnso-cg] Please participate - doodle poll & notes from today'smeeting Dear All, Please find below the notes / action items from today's meeting. In order to determine expected participation during the next calls scheduled in July and August, please complete the following doodle poll: http://doodle.com/e7tms8g47xd6gzcm. Thanks, Marika Action items / notes 15/7 meeting: * Remind members of call schedule and need to participate in meetings GNSO Liaison to the GAC * Agree timetable for appointment - also taking into account travel planning for LA meeting * Update to be provided to GAC during their meeting on 31 July / 1 August on status of appointment Liaison support * Will follow appointment of liaison * Will need to managed properly to ensure that expectations are met * Possible setting up mailing list following appointment of GNSO liaison to the GAC to allow for conversation - further consider what other or additional mechanisms may be needed * Serve as a resource to GNSO liaison to the GAC * GAC focus expected to be on those items that affect or potentially affect public policy GAC members survey * Consider extending deadline to the beginning of next month, incentivise participation and send another reminder * Consider other mechanisms to obtain input * Liaison could also provide regular updates or flag certain issues that may be of interest * Share results received so far with the GAC mailing list Work plan between now and LA * Consider maintaining same frequency for meetings (every two weeks), with team leads meetings in the weeks in between. Does there need to be a pauze for vacation time? * No team lead calls for now, but use mailing list and schedule ad-hoc calls as needed * Staff to conduct a doodle poll for meetings throughout July and August to determine availability of CG members Day-to-day mechanism * Go ahead with current pilots (GNSO liaison and group of liaisons) and determine effect of those before moving forward with other items. * Also consider joint meetings and possible ideas for improvement PDP Work Track * Amr to connect with Suzanne * GAC to look into some of the ideas that were suggested in London such as triage committee * Review slides from London meeting AOB * Is CG the right mechanism to look into hot topics? - probaby not, this group is focused on process not substance * Issues may guide conversations as use cases
Thanks Marika .. It's good that you've noticed and elaborated on the survey bullet to avoid any misinterpretation; as it was unanimously agreed not to share the results of the survey at this stage .. Kind Regards --Manal From: Marika Konings [mailto:marika.konings@icann.org] Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2014 8:55 AM To: Manal Ismail; gac-gnso-cg@icann.org Subject: Re: [Gac-gnso-cg] Please participate - doodle poll & notes from today'smeeting Thanks, Manal, I've updated this in the notes that have been posted on the wiki (see https://community.icann.org/x/2bjhAg <https://community.icann.org/x/2bjhAg> ). In doing so, I also realised that there was something missing from one of the other bullet points regarding the survey and have updated as follows: Share results received so far with the GAC mailing list (not full survey results, but number of participants and relatively limited input provided to date to inspire additional responses). Best regards, Marika From: Manal Ismail <manal@tra.gov.eg> Date: Wednesday 16 July 2014 02:18 To: Marika Konings <marika.konings@icann.org>, "gac-gnso-cg@icann.org" <gac-gnso-cg@icann.org> Subject: RE: [Gac-gnso-cg] Please participate - doodle poll & notes from today'smeeting Many thanks Marika .. Can you please add 'leadership regular interaction' to the second bullet of the Day-to-day mechanism, to read: * Also consider joint meetings/leadership regular interaction and possible ideas for improvement Kind Regards --Manal From: gac-gnso-cg-bounces@icann.org [mailto:gac-gnso-cg-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Marika Konings Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 6:06 PM To: gac-gnso-cg@icann.org Subject: [Gac-gnso-cg] Please participate - doodle poll & notes from today'smeeting Dear All, Please find below the notes / action items from today's meeting. In order to determine expected participation during the next calls scheduled in July and August, please complete the following doodle poll: http://doodle.com/e7tms8g47xd6gzcm. Thanks, Marika Action items / notes 15/7 meeting: * Remind members of call schedule and need to participate in meetings GNSO Liaison to the GAC * Agree timetable for appointment - also taking into account travel planning for LA meeting * Update to be provided to GAC during their meeting on 31 July / 1 August on status of appointment Liaison support * Will follow appointment of liaison * Will need to managed properly to ensure that expectations are met * Possible setting up mailing list following appointment of GNSO liaison to the GAC to allow for conversation - further consider what other or additional mechanisms may be needed * Serve as a resource to GNSO liaison to the GAC * GAC focus expected to be on those items that affect or potentially affect public policy GAC members survey * Consider extending deadline to the beginning of next month, incentivise participation and send another reminder * Consider other mechanisms to obtain input * Liaison could also provide regular updates or flag certain issues that may be of interest * Share results received so far with the GAC mailing list Work plan between now and LA * Consider maintaining same frequency for meetings (every two weeks), with team leads meetings in the weeks in between. Does there need to be a pauze for vacation time? * No team lead calls for now, but use mailing list and schedule ad-hoc calls as needed * Staff to conduct a doodle poll for meetings throughout July and August to determine availability of CG members Day-to-day mechanism * Go ahead with current pilots (GNSO liaison and group of liaisons) and determine effect of those before moving forward with other items. * Also consider joint meetings and possible ideas for improvement PDP Work Track * Amr to connect with Suzanne * GAC to look into some of the ideas that were suggested in London such as triage committee * Review slides from London meeting AOB * Is CG the right mechanism to look into hot topics? - probaby not, this group is focused on process not substance * Issues may guide conversations as use cases
participants (2)
-
Manal Ismail -
Marika Konings