Hi. Sorry I didn't realize this call was taking place today. I will add it to my Calendar. Thanks, Lisa *Lisa Kelly* INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SPECIALIST Legal DEpartment [image: Dow Jones] <http://www.dowjones.com/> a News Corp company O: +1 609 520 4050 <+1+609+520+4050> E: lisa.kelly@dowjones.com A: P.O. Box 300 Princeton NJ 08543 USA On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 10:08 AM, Michelle DeSmyter < michelle.desmyter@icann.org> wrote:
Dear All,
Please find the attendance of the call attached to this email and the AC recording below for the Privacy and Proxy Services Accreditation IRT Meeting held on Tuesday, 29 November 2016 at 14:00 UTC. Attendance of the calls is also posted on the agenda wiki page: https://community.icann. org/x/3I-DAw
*AC Recording: *https://participate.icann.org/p67o5hqw02q/
** Please let me know if your name has been left off the list **
Thank you.
Kind regards,
Michelle
-------------------------------
*Adobe Connect chat transcript for Tuesday, 29 November 2016* Michelle DeSmyter:Dear All, Welcome to the Privacy and Proxy Services Accreditation Program IRT Meeting on Tuesday, 29 November 2016 at 14:00 UTC. Michelle DeSmyter:Agenda page: https://urldefense. proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_x_3I- 2DDAw&d=DgICaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=8_ WhWIPqsLT6TmF1Zmyci866vcPSFO4VShFqESGe_5iHWGlBLwwwehFBfjrsjWv9&m= R0yAcsqWrHhLDvNzsy0FdXKt_FBx1as-ZqXFVu0j_2U&s=XU3EbFQ_ 14GPGGC1JyGdSvwb26ooPMvNleXBsmsqdk8&e= Chris Pelling:Good afternoon all, could we make the chat window slightly taller please ? Chris Pelling:Many thanks, I have 2 lines now :) Tom Kinstler:Good Day to all Graeme Bunton:Morning all. Theo Geurts:hiyas Chris Pelling:Thius time is perfect for me Chris Pelling:I dont see a check mark - sorry Ashley Heineman:I support the time. I'm clearly an idiot.. as I don't see a green check mark. Chris Pelling:yes please :) Sara Bockey:I'm fine with pushing it forward an hour, but this time works for me as well Ashley Heineman:learn something new every day. Chris Pelling:aha found it thanks :) steve metalitz:I am also fine either way and this slot is awfully early for PST Tom Kinstler:Please can you send an email detailing the type of candidate you are looking for in order for us to forward to the right people. Graeme Bunton:My recollection is that the PDP struggled to identify any as well Tom Kinstler:Understood, thank you. Tom Kinstler:YES PLEASE! Greg DiBiase:yes please Carlton Samuels:Morning all Carlton Samuels:My apologies for the late join; connection issues Michele Neylon:Sorry - Can't speak not dialled in - am currently on hold with my bank Mary Wong:We also hope to get specific feedback from the PSWG and the GAC on a potential scope of Section IV Mary Wong:@Tom, wouldn't that come under Section III? Chris Pelling:Within UDRP, that already existts Mary Wong:I believe the existing IP Disclosure Framework allows for trademark holders to make requests, including if the domain is subject to a UDRP proceeding. Nick Shorey:Has the IRT leadership received any further indication from the Board on when further guidance re GAC advice is likely to be received? Nick Shorey:cool - i love short answers! Thanks! Mary Wong:@Nick, the Board is expected to respond to GAC advice from Helsinki and Hyderabad shortly - which includes GAC advice on privacy/proxy issues. Nick Shorey:@Mary thanks for this. most helpful Mary Wong:You're most welcome! Carlton Samuels:Will Sec VI also contains specific data items to be recorded and reported for Compliance purposes? Carlton Samuels:Thanks for the response. Carlton Samuels:Good suggestion Steve. Carlton Samuels:Question, how would the Transfer Policy of Dec 1 impact this? Mary Wong:@Carlton, none of this would change the 1 Dec effective date - however, to the extent that the Board subsequently agrees to the GNSO request to put the privacy/proxy aspect to our IRT, I believe that Compliance will allow for that flexibility. Alex Deacon:Maybe Graeme can describe what other alternatives were discussed? Vicky Sheckler:i'd be interested in understanding hte alternatives for where the issue can be addressed so as not to slow down the work of the work in this group Carlton Samuels:@Mary: Thanks. Look at the comments from this article concerning whois handling. Is that a legit issue? Carlton Samuels:https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http- 3A__domainnamewire.com_2016_11_21_new-2Ddomain-2Dtransfer- 2Dpolicy-2Ddnw-2Dpodcast-2D111_&d=DgICaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6 sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=8_WhWIPqsLT6TmF1Zmyci866vcPSFO4VShFqESGe_ 5iHWGlBLwwwehFBfjrsjWv9&m=R0yAcsqWrHhLDvNzsy0FdXKt_ FBx1as-ZqXFVu0j_2U&s=eArgs-RUAdUiyEXX8zEs_hwxHhOVOnzuImPnG5qgQwQ&e= Graeme Bunton:Alex - I don't want to eat this call up on that issue, but if there is time at the end? Graeme Bunton:or maybe the RrSG could host a chat with IPC on this? Luc Seufer:Do we have LEA reps on this WG? (and not just US ones) Graeme Bunton:Nick Shorey is from UK LEA Alex Deacon:Thanks Graeme - just curious that other alternatives were discussed. I don't object per se but want to make sure it doesn't delay existing work.... Luc Seufer:it would be good to have some from Asia... where the language can be a barrier for PPSAI providers to handle requests Mary Wong:If it helps, any request from the Board/GNSO to handle the privacy/proxy aspects of IRTP within our IRT will be strictly bounded as such - any new or additional policy issues that may arise in the course of doing so will not be for the IRT to solve; ICANN's existing Consensus Policy Implementation Framework allows for how that will be handled e.g. referral back to the GNSO for policy work. Carlton Samuels:Thanks all. Bye Sara Bockey:thanks all Philip Corwin:bye all Tom Kinstler:THanks all Chris Pelling:Many thanks :) Alex Deacon:Thanks! Nick Shorey:Thanks! Luc Seufer:bye
_______________________________________________ Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl mailing list Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl