I agree with Darcy on this….. Steve [image001] Steven J. Metalitz | Partner, through his professional corporation T: 202.355.7902 | met@msk.com<mailto:met@msk.com> Mitchell Silberberg & Knupp LLP | www.msk.com<http://www.msk.com/> 1818 N Street NW, 8th Floor, Washington, DC 20036 THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS E-MAIL MESSAGE IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE PERSONAL AND CONFIDENTIAL USE OF THE DESIGNATED RECIPIENTS. THIS MESSAGE MAY BE AN ATTORNEY-CLIENT COMMUNICATION, AND AS SUCH IS PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL. IF THE READER OF THIS MESSAGE IS NOT AN INTENDED RECIPIENT, YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT ANY REVIEW, USE, DISSEMINATION, FORWARDING OR COPYING OF THIS MESSAGE IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. PLEASE NOTIFY US IMMEDIATELY BY REPLY E-MAIL OR TELEPHONE, AND DELETE THE ORIGINAL MESSAGE AND ALL ATTACHMENTS FROM YOUR SYSTEM. THANK YOU. From: gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces@icann.org [mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Darcy Southwell Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2017 11:07 AM To: gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org Subject: [Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl] Draft Language Hi, Amy. At the very end of today’s call, Steve Metalitz asked a question in the chat that I think you answered at the very end: steve metalitz: Staff, assuming you get further guidance through a poll or otherwise, when could we expect t see a specific proposal with draft language? *** Amy Bivins 2: Re: Steve, we could draft language for either quickly, but will have questions re: specifics to discuss I think we all realize that questions and discussions will come from the draft language, but I think they will be far more productive if we have draft language to discuss (rather than theoretical concepts). I would encourage staff to draft a proposal based on the PDP recommendations. Then we can have material conversations about how this program. Thanks, Darcy ---------------- Darcy Southwell | Compliance Officer M: +1 503-453-7305<tel:(503)%20453-7305> │ Skype: darcy.enyeart [cid:image003.png@01D2BDB4.7CE3EA00]
