Notes, Action Items from 22 August PP IRT Call [PLEASE complete poll]
Hello, All, Thanks so much for your active participation on yesterday's Privacy/Proxy IRT call. For those of you would could not attend, I encourage you to please listen to the recording, available on the wiki, https://community.icann.org/display/IRT/22+August+2017. Several action items resulted from this meeting: * IRT: Please complete this linked poll regarding the proposed edit to the LEA framework, specification 4 of the draft PPAA, https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/2F5BGBG, no later than next Monday, 28 August. Please read the background before the first question carefully. * The IRT discussion on this topic yesterday continued to demonstrate a division among the group regarding this proposed edit. The results of this poll will not be counted as a vote but are intended to ensure that we have a complete record and understanding of all IRT participants' opinions on this topic. This is important. Please participate. There are only two substantive questions. * IRT: Please provide any additional feedback no later than Monday, 28 August, on the "record-keeping" topic, issue 24 on the issues list. * IRT: Please provide any additional feedback you have no later than Monday, 28 August, on the IP framework (issue 20 on the issues list), particularly the issue raised on the call, regarding the proposed addition of language from the framework's introduction in the Final Report. * IRT: Please provide any additional feedback you have no later than Monday, 28 August, on the "business dealings" section of the PPAA draft (issue 25 on the issues list). * ICANN will review the "business dealings" section of the PPAA draft, per IRT feedback, to ensure that the language (when read in consultation with the rest of the contract) will not result in duplicative notice requirements (ie, customers should receive one notice (e.g. data accuracy notices), either from the provider or registrar-not both). Finally, you will notice that we are moving fairly quickly to the end of the issues list (albeit with many action items to follow up on). Please send any additional points related to the PPAA draft that you would like to discuss to the list. Once we reach the end of the issues list, if we have no further suggestions from you, we will move on to other topics. For next week's call, we are planning to discuss data escrow and RDDS labeling. I will confirm this by Monday morning Eastern Time at the latest (we are currently working to finalize an updated draft specification for your review). Best, Amy Amy E. Bivins Registrar Services and Engagement Senior Manager Registrar Services and Industry Relations Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Direct: +1 (202) 249-7551 Fax: +1 (202) 789-0104 Email: amy.bivins@icann.org<mailto:amy.bivins@icann.org> www.icann.org<http://www.icann.org>
Dear Colleagues, I'm able to confirm that we will be discussing data escrow on next week's Privacy/Proxy IRT call (29 August). We will also be discussing the RDDS labeling specification in the PPAA draft v1. We don't have draft text to show you yet on data escrow-we want to talk through a few issues first to ensure we are on the right track before finalizing proposed text. We will have members of ICANN's technical services team on the call to discuss. Also, this is a reminder to please complete the linked poll related to the LEA framework, https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/2F5BGBG no later than this upcoming Monday, 28 August. In addition, please send any additional input on the topics discussed this week and any additional suggestions for sections of the PPAA draft that you would like to discuss to the list. Thanks, and have a great weekend! Amy Amy E. Bivins Registrar Services and Engagement Senior Manager Registrar Services and Industry Relations Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Direct: +1 (202) 249-7551 Fax: +1 (202) 789-0104 Email: amy.bivins@icann.org<mailto:amy.bivins@icann.org> www.icann.org<http://www.icann.org> From: gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces@icann.org [mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Amy Bivins Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2017 10:00 AM To: gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org Subject: [Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl] Notes, Action Items from 22 August PP IRT Call [PLEASE complete poll] Hello, All, Thanks so much for your active participation on yesterday's Privacy/Proxy IRT call. For those of you would could not attend, I encourage you to please listen to the recording, available on the wiki, https://community.icann.org/display/IRT/22+August+2017. Several action items resulted from this meeting: * IRT: Please complete this linked poll regarding the proposed edit to the LEA framework, specification 4 of the draft PPAA, https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/2F5BGBG, no later than next Monday, 28 August. Please read the background before the first question carefully. * The IRT discussion on this topic yesterday continued to demonstrate a division among the group regarding this proposed edit. The results of this poll will not be counted as a vote but are intended to ensure that we have a complete record and understanding of all IRT participants' opinions on this topic. This is important. Please participate. There are only two substantive questions. * IRT: Please provide any additional feedback no later than Monday, 28 August, on the "record-keeping" topic, issue 24 on the issues list. * IRT: Please provide any additional feedback you have no later than Monday, 28 August, on the IP framework (issue 20 on the issues list), particularly the issue raised on the call, regarding the proposed addition of language from the framework's introduction in the Final Report. * IRT: Please provide any additional feedback you have no later than Monday, 28 August, on the "business dealings" section of the PPAA draft (issue 25 on the issues list). * ICANN will review the "business dealings" section of the PPAA draft, per IRT feedback, to ensure that the language (when read in consultation with the rest of the contract) will not result in duplicative notice requirements (ie, customers should receive one notice (e.g. data accuracy notices), either from the provider or registrar-not both). Finally, you will notice that we are moving fairly quickly to the end of the issues list (albeit with many action items to follow up on). Please send any additional points related to the PPAA draft that you would like to discuss to the list. Once we reach the end of the issues list, if we have no further suggestions from you, we will move on to other topics. For next week's call, we are planning to discuss data escrow and RDDS labeling. I will confirm this by Monday morning Eastern Time at the latest (we are currently working to finalize an updated draft specification for your review). Best, Amy Amy E. Bivins Registrar Services and Engagement Senior Manager Registrar Services and Industry Relations Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Direct: +1 (202) 249-7551 Fax: +1 (202) 789-0104 Email: amy.bivins@icann.org<mailto:amy.bivins@icann.org> www.icann.org<http://www.icann.org>
Hi Amy & All- Here are additional comments on the IP Framework: * What is the justification for charging? (see: Section 1.2.3. Assessing a nominal cost-recovery fee for processing complaint submissions, or to maintain Requester account so long as this does not serve as an unreasonable barrier to access to the process). Since there was no support on the IRT for requiring manual review of requests, perhaps there is no longer a need to charge a fee for submitting requests. * Section 1.2 - There should be an appeal process built in (just like registrars are afforded when “adversely affected”) – especially where the Provider can revoke or block Requester access to the submission tool … * Section 2.1.6.1 and 2.2.7.1- Requiring the rights holder to state that “is not defensible: is an improper standard because anyone can “claim a defense” * Section 3.3.4 – if the disclosure is refused, and the customer has surrendered the name, how does the rights holder identify who and where to sue for past infringement? Are the providers to be sued in lieu of the customer? All the best, Margie From: <gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Amy Bivins <amy.bivins@icann.org> Reply-To: "gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org" <gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org> Date: Friday, August 25, 2017 at 7:54 AM To: "gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org" <gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org> Subject: Re: [Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl] Notes, Action Items from 22 August PP IRT Call [PLEASE complete poll] Dear Colleagues, I’m able to confirm that we will be discussing data escrow on next week’s Privacy/Proxy IRT call (29 August). We will also be discussing the RDDS labeling specification in the PPAA draft v1. We don’t have draft text to show you yet on data escrow—we want to talk through a few issues first to ensure we are on the right track before finalizing proposed text. We will have members of ICANN’s technical services team on the call to discuss. Also, this is a reminder to please complete the linked poll related to the LEA framework, https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/2F5BGBG<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.surveymonkey.com_r_2F5BGBG&d=DwMFAg&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=_4XWSt8rUHZPiRG6CoP4Fnk_CCk4p550lffeMi3E1z8&m=NFpK2YlsA7dZRa4pshqhjKa9ULu5nbRd9X6GNs8gZjk&s=bGGNH7-bqMVChgKEYs60gIb2dKAU-EIRe-EdaTQKBQE&e=> no later than this upcoming Monday, 28 August. In addition, please send any additional input on the topics discussed this week and any additional suggestions for sections of the PPAA draft that you would like to discuss to the list. Thanks, and have a great weekend! Amy Amy E. Bivins Registrar Services and Engagement Senior Manager Registrar Services and Industry Relations Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Direct: +1 (202) 249-7551 Fax: +1 (202) 789-0104 Email: amy.bivins@icann.org<mailto:amy.bivins@icann.org> www.icann.org<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.icann.org&d=DwMFAg&c...> From: gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces@icann.org [mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Amy Bivins Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2017 10:00 AM To: gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org Subject: [Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl] Notes, Action Items from 22 August PP IRT Call [PLEASE complete poll] Hello, All, Thanks so much for your active participation on yesterday’s Privacy/Proxy IRT call. For those of you would could not attend, I encourage you to please listen to the recording, available on the wiki, https://community.icann.org/display/IRT/22+August+2017<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_display_IRT_22-2BAugust-2B2017&d=DwMFAg&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=_4XWSt8rUHZPiRG6CoP4Fnk_CCk4p550lffeMi3E1z8&m=NFpK2YlsA7dZRa4pshqhjKa9ULu5nbRd9X6GNs8gZjk&s=4v-2Pm-5tQXv9g8XsaOZ2qF5tKslQO3xSCWiQj7RPW0&e=>. Several action items resulted from this meeting: * IRT: Please complete this linked poll regarding the proposed edit to the LEA framework, specification 4 of the draft PPAA, https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/2F5BGBG<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.surveymonkey.com_r_2F5BGBG&d=DwMFAg&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=_4XWSt8rUHZPiRG6CoP4Fnk_CCk4p550lffeMi3E1z8&m=NFpK2YlsA7dZRa4pshqhjKa9ULu5nbRd9X6GNs8gZjk&s=bGGNH7-bqMVChgKEYs60gIb2dKAU-EIRe-EdaTQKBQE&e=>, no later than next Monday, 28 August. Please read the background before the first question carefully. * The IRT discussion on this topic yesterday continued to demonstrate a division among the group regarding this proposed edit. The results of this poll will not be counted as a vote but are intended to ensure that we have a complete record and understanding of all IRT participants’ opinions on this topic. This is important. Please participate. There are only two substantive questions. * IRT: Please provide any additional feedback no later than Monday, 28 August, on the “record-keeping” topic, issue 24 on the issues list. * IRT: Please provide any additional feedback you have no later than Monday, 28 August, on the IP framework (issue 20 on the issues list), particularly the issue raised on the call, regarding the proposed addition of language from the framework’s introduction in the Final Report. * IRT: Please provide any additional feedback you have no later than Monday, 28 August, on the “business dealings” section of the PPAA draft (issue 25 on the issues list). * ICANN will review the “business dealings” section of the PPAA draft, per IRT feedback, to ensure that the language (when read in consultation with the rest of the contract) will not result in duplicative notice requirements (ie, customers should receive one notice (e.g. data accuracy notices), either from the provider or registrar—not both). Finally, you will notice that we are moving fairly quickly to the end of the issues list (albeit with many action items to follow up on). Please send any additional points related to the PPAA draft that you would like to discuss to the list. Once we reach the end of the issues list, if we have no further suggestions from you, we will move on to other topics. For next week’s call, we are planning to discuss data escrow and RDDS labeling. I will confirm this by Monday morning Eastern Time at the latest (we are currently working to finalize an updated draft specification for your review). Best, Amy Amy E. Bivins Registrar Services and Engagement Senior Manager Registrar Services and Industry Relations Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Direct: +1 (202) 249-7551 Fax: +1 (202) 789-0104 Email: amy.bivins@icann.org<mailto:amy.bivins@icann.org> www.icann.org<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.icann.org&d=DwMFAg&c...>
Thanks, Mary! Do others in the group have thoughts on these points? Thanks! Amy From: gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces@icann.org [mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Margie Milam Sent: Monday, August 28, 2017 8:26 PM To: gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org Subject: Re: [Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl] Notes, Action Items from 22 August PP IRT Call [PLEASE complete poll] Hi Amy & All- Here are additional comments on the IP Framework: * What is the justification for charging? (see: Section 1.2.3. Assessing a nominal cost-recovery fee for processing complaint submissions, or to maintain Requester account so long as this does not serve as an unreasonable barrier to access to the process). Since there was no support on the IRT for requiring manual review of requests, perhaps there is no longer a need to charge a fee for submitting requests. * Section 1.2 - There should be an appeal process built in (just like registrars are afforded when “adversely affected”) – especially where the Provider can revoke or block Requester access to the submission tool … * Section 2.1.6.1 and 2.2.7.1- Requiring the rights holder to state that “is not defensible: is an improper standard because anyone can “claim a defense” * Section 3.3.4 – if the disclosure is refused, and the customer has surrendered the name, how does the rights holder identify who and where to sue for past infringement? Are the providers to be sued in lieu of the customer? All the best, Margie From: <gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces@icann.org<mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces@icann.org>> on behalf of Amy Bivins <amy.bivins@icann.org<mailto:amy.bivins@icann.org>> Reply-To: "gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org<mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org>" <gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org<mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org>> Date: Friday, August 25, 2017 at 7:54 AM To: "gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org<mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org>" <gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org<mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org>> Subject: Re: [Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl] Notes, Action Items from 22 August PP IRT Call [PLEASE complete poll] Dear Colleagues, I’m able to confirm that we will be discussing data escrow on next week’s Privacy/Proxy IRT call (29 August). We will also be discussing the RDDS labeling specification in the PPAA draft v1. We don’t have draft text to show you yet on data escrow—we want to talk through a few issues first to ensure we are on the right track before finalizing proposed text. We will have members of ICANN’s technical services team on the call to discuss. Also, this is a reminder to please complete the linked poll related to the LEA framework, https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/2F5BGBG<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.surveymonkey.com_r_2F5BGBG&d=DwMFAg&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=_4XWSt8rUHZPiRG6CoP4Fnk_CCk4p550lffeMi3E1z8&m=NFpK2YlsA7dZRa4pshqhjKa9ULu5nbRd9X6GNs8gZjk&s=bGGNH7-bqMVChgKEYs60gIb2dKAU-EIRe-EdaTQKBQE&e=> no later than this upcoming Monday, 28 August. In addition, please send any additional input on the topics discussed this week and any additional suggestions for sections of the PPAA draft that you would like to discuss to the list. Thanks, and have a great weekend! Amy Amy E. Bivins Registrar Services and Engagement Senior Manager Registrar Services and Industry Relations Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Direct: +1 (202) 249-7551 Fax: +1 (202) 789-0104 Email: amy.bivins@icann.org<mailto:amy.bivins@icann.org> www.icann.org<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.icann.org&d=DwMFAg&c...> From: gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces@icann.org<mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces@icann.org> [mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Amy Bivins Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2017 10:00 AM To: gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org<mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org> Subject: [Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl] Notes, Action Items from 22 August PP IRT Call [PLEASE complete poll] Hello, All, Thanks so much for your active participation on yesterday’s Privacy/Proxy IRT call. For those of you would could not attend, I encourage you to please listen to the recording, available on the wiki, https://community.icann.org/display/IRT/22+August+2017<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_display_IRT_22-2BAugust-2B2017&d=DwMFAg&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=_4XWSt8rUHZPiRG6CoP4Fnk_CCk4p550lffeMi3E1z8&m=NFpK2YlsA7dZRa4pshqhjKa9ULu5nbRd9X6GNs8gZjk&s=4v-2Pm-5tQXv9g8XsaOZ2qF5tKslQO3xSCWiQj7RPW0&e=>. Several action items resulted from this meeting: * IRT: Please complete this linked poll regarding the proposed edit to the LEA framework, specification 4 of the draft PPAA, https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/2F5BGBG<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.surveymonkey.com_r_2F5BGBG&d=DwMFAg&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=_4XWSt8rUHZPiRG6CoP4Fnk_CCk4p550lffeMi3E1z8&m=NFpK2YlsA7dZRa4pshqhjKa9ULu5nbRd9X6GNs8gZjk&s=bGGNH7-bqMVChgKEYs60gIb2dKAU-EIRe-EdaTQKBQE&e=>, no later than next Monday, 28 August. Please read the background before the first question carefully. * The IRT discussion on this topic yesterday continued to demonstrate a division among the group regarding this proposed edit. The results of this poll will not be counted as a vote but are intended to ensure that we have a complete record and understanding of all IRT participants’ opinions on this topic. This is important. Please participate. There are only two substantive questions. * IRT: Please provide any additional feedback no later than Monday, 28 August, on the “record-keeping” topic, issue 24 on the issues list. * IRT: Please provide any additional feedback you have no later than Monday, 28 August, on the IP framework (issue 20 on the issues list), particularly the issue raised on the call, regarding the proposed addition of language from the framework’s introduction in the Final Report. * IRT: Please provide any additional feedback you have no later than Monday, 28 August, on the “business dealings” section of the PPAA draft (issue 25 on the issues list). * ICANN will review the “business dealings” section of the PPAA draft, per IRT feedback, to ensure that the language (when read in consultation with the rest of the contract) will not result in duplicative notice requirements (ie, customers should receive one notice (e.g. data accuracy notices), either from the provider or registrar—not both). Finally, you will notice that we are moving fairly quickly to the end of the issues list (albeit with many action items to follow up on). Please send any additional points related to the PPAA draft that you would like to discuss to the list. Once we reach the end of the issues list, if we have no further suggestions from you, we will move on to other topics. For next week’s call, we are planning to discuss data escrow and RDDS labeling. I will confirm this by Monday morning Eastern Time at the latest (we are currently working to finalize an updated draft specification for your review). Best, Amy Amy E. Bivins Registrar Services and Engagement Senior Manager Registrar Services and Industry Relations Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Direct: +1 (202) 249-7551 Fax: +1 (202) 789-0104 Email: amy.bivins@icann.org<mailto:amy.bivins@icann.org> www.icann.org<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.icann.org&d=DwMFAg&c...>
Apologies, obviously I mean “Thanks, Margie.” From: gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces@icann.org [mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Amy Bivins Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2017 8:51 AM To: gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org Subject: Re: [Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl] Notes, Action Items from 22 August PP IRT Call [PLEASE complete poll] Thanks, Mary! Do others in the group have thoughts on these points? Thanks! Amy From: gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces@icann.org<mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces@icann.org> [mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Margie Milam Sent: Monday, August 28, 2017 8:26 PM To: gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org<mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org> Subject: Re: [Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl] Notes, Action Items from 22 August PP IRT Call [PLEASE complete poll] Hi Amy & All- Here are additional comments on the IP Framework: * What is the justification for charging? (see: Section 1.2.3. Assessing a nominal cost-recovery fee for processing complaint submissions, or to maintain Requester account so long as this does not serve as an unreasonable barrier to access to the process). Since there was no support on the IRT for requiring manual review of requests, perhaps there is no longer a need to charge a fee for submitting requests. * Section 1.2 - There should be an appeal process built in (just like registrars are afforded when “adversely affected”) – especially where the Provider can revoke or block Requester access to the submission tool … * Section 2.1.6.1 and 2.2.7.1- Requiring the rights holder to state that “is not defensible: is an improper standard because anyone can “claim a defense” * Section 3.3.4 – if the disclosure is refused, and the customer has surrendered the name, how does the rights holder identify who and where to sue for past infringement? Are the providers to be sued in lieu of the customer? All the best, Margie From: <gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces@icann.org<mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces@icann.org>> on behalf of Amy Bivins <amy.bivins@icann.org<mailto:amy.bivins@icann.org>> Reply-To: "gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org<mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org>" <gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org<mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org>> Date: Friday, August 25, 2017 at 7:54 AM To: "gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org<mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org>" <gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org<mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org>> Subject: Re: [Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl] Notes, Action Items from 22 August PP IRT Call [PLEASE complete poll] Dear Colleagues, I’m able to confirm that we will be discussing data escrow on next week’s Privacy/Proxy IRT call (29 August). We will also be discussing the RDDS labeling specification in the PPAA draft v1. We don’t have draft text to show you yet on data escrow—we want to talk through a few issues first to ensure we are on the right track before finalizing proposed text. We will have members of ICANN’s technical services team on the call to discuss. Also, this is a reminder to please complete the linked poll related to the LEA framework, https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/2F5BGBG<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.surveymonkey.com_r_2F5BGBG&d=DwMFAg&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=_4XWSt8rUHZPiRG6CoP4Fnk_CCk4p550lffeMi3E1z8&m=NFpK2YlsA7dZRa4pshqhjKa9ULu5nbRd9X6GNs8gZjk&s=bGGNH7-bqMVChgKEYs60gIb2dKAU-EIRe-EdaTQKBQE&e=> no later than this upcoming Monday, 28 August. In addition, please send any additional input on the topics discussed this week and any additional suggestions for sections of the PPAA draft that you would like to discuss to the list. Thanks, and have a great weekend! Amy Amy E. Bivins Registrar Services and Engagement Senior Manager Registrar Services and Industry Relations Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Direct: +1 (202) 249-7551 Fax: +1 (202) 789-0104 Email: amy.bivins@icann.org<mailto:amy.bivins@icann.org> www.icann.org<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.icann.org&d=DwMFAg&c...> From: gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces@icann.org<mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces@icann.org> [mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Amy Bivins Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2017 10:00 AM To: gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org<mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org> Subject: [Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl] Notes, Action Items from 22 August PP IRT Call [PLEASE complete poll] Hello, All, Thanks so much for your active participation on yesterday’s Privacy/Proxy IRT call. For those of you would could not attend, I encourage you to please listen to the recording, available on the wiki, https://community.icann.org/display/IRT/22+August+2017<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_display_IRT_22-2BAugust-2B2017&d=DwMFAg&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=_4XWSt8rUHZPiRG6CoP4Fnk_CCk4p550lffeMi3E1z8&m=NFpK2YlsA7dZRa4pshqhjKa9ULu5nbRd9X6GNs8gZjk&s=4v-2Pm-5tQXv9g8XsaOZ2qF5tKslQO3xSCWiQj7RPW0&e=>. Several action items resulted from this meeting: * IRT: Please complete this linked poll regarding the proposed edit to the LEA framework, specification 4 of the draft PPAA, https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/2F5BGBG<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.surveymonkey.com_r_2F5BGBG&d=DwMFAg&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=_4XWSt8rUHZPiRG6CoP4Fnk_CCk4p550lffeMi3E1z8&m=NFpK2YlsA7dZRa4pshqhjKa9ULu5nbRd9X6GNs8gZjk&s=bGGNH7-bqMVChgKEYs60gIb2dKAU-EIRe-EdaTQKBQE&e=>, no later than next Monday, 28 August. Please read the background before the first question carefully. * The IRT discussion on this topic yesterday continued to demonstrate a division among the group regarding this proposed edit. The results of this poll will not be counted as a vote but are intended to ensure that we have a complete record and understanding of all IRT participants’ opinions on this topic. This is important. Please participate. There are only two substantive questions. * IRT: Please provide any additional feedback no later than Monday, 28 August, on the “record-keeping” topic, issue 24 on the issues list. * IRT: Please provide any additional feedback you have no later than Monday, 28 August, on the IP framework (issue 20 on the issues list), particularly the issue raised on the call, regarding the proposed addition of language from the framework’s introduction in the Final Report. * IRT: Please provide any additional feedback you have no later than Monday, 28 August, on the “business dealings” section of the PPAA draft (issue 25 on the issues list). * ICANN will review the “business dealings” section of the PPAA draft, per IRT feedback, to ensure that the language (when read in consultation with the rest of the contract) will not result in duplicative notice requirements (ie, customers should receive one notice (e.g. data accuracy notices), either from the provider or registrar—not both). Finally, you will notice that we are moving fairly quickly to the end of the issues list (albeit with many action items to follow up on). Please send any additional points related to the PPAA draft that you would like to discuss to the list. Once we reach the end of the issues list, if we have no further suggestions from you, we will move on to other topics. For next week’s call, we are planning to discuss data escrow and RDDS labeling. I will confirm this by Monday morning Eastern Time at the latest (we are currently working to finalize an updated draft specification for your review). Best, Amy Amy E. Bivins Registrar Services and Engagement Senior Manager Registrar Services and Industry Relations Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Direct: +1 (202) 249-7551 Fax: +1 (202) 789-0104 Email: amy.bivins@icann.org<mailto:amy.bivins@icann.org> www.icann.org<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.icann.org&d=DwMFAg&c...>
Hi Amy, I was just looking over the “clean” version of the PPAA and noticed that the new language for 3.5.4.1 has not been incorporated. I believe we were wanting the language to read more along the lines of “…or its failure to respond to Provider inquiries within the time frame required by Provider’s Terms of Service (not to exceed (15) days) …” thanks Sara sara bockey policy manager | GoDaddy™ sbockey@godaddy.com 480-366-3616 skype: sbockey This email message and any attachments hereto is intended for use only by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain confidential information. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender and permanently delete the original and any copy of this message and its attachments. From: <gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Amy Bivins <amy.bivins@icann.org> Reply-To: "gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org" <gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org> Date: Wednesday, August 23, 2017 at 7:00 AM To: "gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org" <gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org> Subject: [Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl] Notes, Action Items from 22 August PP IRT Call [PLEASE complete poll] Hello, All, Thanks so much for your active participation on yesterday’s Privacy/Proxy IRT call. For those of you would could not attend, I encourage you to please listen to the recording, available on the wiki, https://community.icann.org/display/IRT/22+August+2017. Several action items resulted from this meeting: * IRT: Please complete this linked poll regarding the proposed edit to the LEA framework, specification 4 of the draft PPAA, https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/2F5BGBG, no later than next Monday, 28 August. Please read the background before the first question carefully. * The IRT discussion on this topic yesterday continued to demonstrate a division among the group regarding this proposed edit. The results of this poll will not be counted as a vote but are intended to ensure that we have a complete record and understanding of all IRT participants’ opinions on this topic. This is important. Please participate. There are only two substantive questions. * IRT: Please provide any additional feedback no later than Monday, 28 August, on the “record-keeping” topic, issue 24 on the issues list. * IRT: Please provide any additional feedback you have no later than Monday, 28 August, on the IP framework (issue 20 on the issues list), particularly the issue raised on the call, regarding the proposed addition of language from the framework’s introduction in the Final Report. * IRT: Please provide any additional feedback you have no later than Monday, 28 August, on the “business dealings” section of the PPAA draft (issue 25 on the issues list). * ICANN will review the “business dealings” section of the PPAA draft, per IRT feedback, to ensure that the language (when read in consultation with the rest of the contract) will not result in duplicative notice requirements (ie, customers should receive one notice (e.g. data accuracy notices), either from the provider or registrar—not both). Finally, you will notice that we are moving fairly quickly to the end of the issues list (albeit with many action items to follow up on). Please send any additional points related to the PPAA draft that you would like to discuss to the list. Once we reach the end of the issues list, if we have no further suggestions from you, we will move on to other topics. For next week’s call, we are planning to discuss data escrow and RDDS labeling. I will confirm this by Monday morning Eastern Time at the latest (we are currently working to finalize an updated draft specification for your review). Best, Amy Amy E. Bivins Registrar Services and Engagement Senior Manager Registrar Services and Industry Relations Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Direct: +1 (202) 249-7551 Fax: +1 (202) 789-0104 Email: amy.bivins@icann.org<mailto:amy.bivins@icann.org> www.icann.org<http://www.icann.org>
Hi Sara, Yes, you are correct. We have added that language to the next version (draft v2) but that draft won’t be distributed to the IRT until we are through this first round of discussions (to avoid the need for many more rounds of edits to the draft). Best, Amy From: gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces@icann.org [mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Sara Bockey Sent: Monday, August 28, 2017 4:11 PM To: gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org Subject: Re: [Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl] Notes, Action Items from 22 August PP IRT Call [PLEASE complete poll] Hi Amy, I was just looking over the “clean” version of the PPAA and noticed that the new language for 3.5.4.1 has not been incorporated. I believe we were wanting the language to read more along the lines of “…or its failure to respond to Provider inquiries within the time frame required by Provider’s Terms of Service (not to exceed (15) days) …” thanks Sara sara bockey policy manager | GoDaddy™ sbockey@godaddy.com<mailto:sbockey@godaddy.com> 480-366-3616 skype: sbockey This email message and any attachments hereto is intended for use only by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain confidential information. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender and permanently delete the original and any copy of this message and its attachments. From: <gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces@icann.org<mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces@icann.org>> on behalf of Amy Bivins <amy.bivins@icann.org<mailto:amy.bivins@icann.org>> Reply-To: "gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org<mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org>" <gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org<mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org>> Date: Wednesday, August 23, 2017 at 7:00 AM To: "gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org<mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org>" <gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org<mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org>> Subject: [Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl] Notes, Action Items from 22 August PP IRT Call [PLEASE complete poll] Hello, All, Thanks so much for your active participation on yesterday’s Privacy/Proxy IRT call. For those of you would could not attend, I encourage you to please listen to the recording, available on the wiki, https://community.icann.org/display/IRT/22+August+2017. Several action items resulted from this meeting: * IRT: Please complete this linked poll regarding the proposed edit to the LEA framework, specification 4 of the draft PPAA, https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/2F5BGBG, no later than next Monday, 28 August. Please read the background before the first question carefully. * The IRT discussion on this topic yesterday continued to demonstrate a division among the group regarding this proposed edit. The results of this poll will not be counted as a vote but are intended to ensure that we have a complete record and understanding of all IRT participants’ opinions on this topic. This is important. Please participate. There are only two substantive questions. * IRT: Please provide any additional feedback no later than Monday, 28 August, on the “record-keeping” topic, issue 24 on the issues list. * IRT: Please provide any additional feedback you have no later than Monday, 28 August, on the IP framework (issue 20 on the issues list), particularly the issue raised on the call, regarding the proposed addition of language from the framework’s introduction in the Final Report. * IRT: Please provide any additional feedback you have no later than Monday, 28 August, on the “business dealings” section of the PPAA draft (issue 25 on the issues list). * ICANN will review the “business dealings” section of the PPAA draft, per IRT feedback, to ensure that the language (when read in consultation with the rest of the contract) will not result in duplicative notice requirements (ie, customers should receive one notice (e.g. data accuracy notices), either from the provider or registrar—not both). Finally, you will notice that we are moving fairly quickly to the end of the issues list (albeit with many action items to follow up on). Please send any additional points related to the PPAA draft that you would like to discuss to the list. Once we reach the end of the issues list, if we have no further suggestions from you, we will move on to other topics. For next week’s call, we are planning to discuss data escrow and RDDS labeling. I will confirm this by Monday morning Eastern Time at the latest (we are currently working to finalize an updated draft specification for your review). Best, Amy Amy E. Bivins Registrar Services and Engagement Senior Manager Registrar Services and Industry Relations Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Direct: +1 (202) 249-7551 Fax: +1 (202) 789-0104 Email: amy.bivins@icann.org<mailto:amy.bivins@icann.org> www.icann.org<http://www.icann.org>
We have already discussed some other changes to 3.5.4.1 of the PPAA v. 1 which I assume will be reflected in v.2. One additional issue re 3.5.4: The chapeau paragraph requires the customer to provide contact information but does not specify admin or tech contact. However, 3.5.4.2 states that Customer must provide “accurate technical and administrative contact information.” The goal should be for the Customer to provide enough information so that, in the event the p/p service is terminated and Publication occurs, the contact info submitted could be published in Whois. This is consistent with 3.5.4.2. Perhaps the initial paragraph of 3.5.4 should be revised to conform to this. Steve [image001] Steven J. Metalitz | Partner, through his professional corporation T: 202.355.7902 | met@msk.com<mailto:met@msk.com> Mitchell Silberberg & Knupp LLP | www.msk.com<http://www.msk.com/> 1818 N Street NW, 8th Floor, Washington, DC 20036 THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS E-MAIL MESSAGE IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE PERSONAL AND CONFIDENTIAL USE OF THE DESIGNATED RECIPIENTS. THIS MESSAGE MAY BE AN ATTORNEY-CLIENT COMMUNICATION, AND AS SUCH IS PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL. IF THE READER OF THIS MESSAGE IS NOT AN INTENDED RECIPIENT, YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT ANY REVIEW, USE, DISSEMINATION, FORWARDING OR COPYING OF THIS MESSAGE IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. PLEASE NOTIFY US IMMEDIATELY BY REPLY E-MAIL OR TELEPHONE, AND DELETE THE ORIGINAL MESSAGE AND ALL ATTACHMENTS FROM YOUR SYSTEM. THANK YOU. From: gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces@icann.org [mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Amy Bivins Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2017 8:43 AM To: gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org Subject: Re: [Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl] Notes, Action Items from 22 August PP IRT Call [PLEASE complete poll] Hi Sara, Yes, you are correct. We have added that language to the next version (draft v2) but that draft won’t be distributed to the IRT until we are through this first round of discussions (to avoid the need for many more rounds of edits to the draft). Best, Amy From: gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces@icann.org<mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces@icann.org> [mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Sara Bockey Sent: Monday, August 28, 2017 4:11 PM To: gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org<mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org> Subject: Re: [Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl] Notes, Action Items from 22 August PP IRT Call [PLEASE complete poll] Hi Amy, I was just looking over the “clean” version of the PPAA and noticed that the new language for 3.5.4.1 has not been incorporated. I believe we were wanting the language to read more along the lines of “…or its failure to respond to Provider inquiries within the time frame required by Provider’s Terms of Service (not to exceed (15) days) …” thanks Sara sara bockey policy manager | GoDaddy™ sbockey@godaddy.com<mailto:sbockey@godaddy.com> 480-366-3616 skype: sbockey This email message and any attachments hereto is intended for use only by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain confidential information. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender and permanently delete the original and any copy of this message and its attachments. From: <gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces@icann.org<mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces@icann.org>> on behalf of Amy Bivins <amy.bivins@icann.org<mailto:amy.bivins@icann.org>> Reply-To: "gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org<mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org>" <gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org<mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org>> Date: Wednesday, August 23, 2017 at 7:00 AM To: "gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org<mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org>" <gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org<mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org>> Subject: [Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl] Notes, Action Items from 22 August PP IRT Call [PLEASE complete poll] Hello, All, Thanks so much for your active participation on yesterday’s Privacy/Proxy IRT call. For those of you would could not attend, I encourage you to please listen to the recording, available on the wiki, https://community.icann.org/display/IRT/22+August+2017<https://community.icann.org/display/IRT/22+August+2017>. Several action items resulted from this meeting: * IRT: Please complete this linked poll regarding the proposed edit to the LEA framework, specification 4 of the draft PPAA, https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/2F5BGBG, no later than next Monday, 28 August. Please read the background before the first question carefully. * The IRT discussion on this topic yesterday continued to demonstrate a division among the group regarding this proposed edit. The results of this poll will not be counted as a vote but are intended to ensure that we have a complete record and understanding of all IRT participants’ opinions on this topic. This is important. Please participate. There are only two substantive questions. * IRT: Please provide any additional feedback no later than Monday, 28 August, on the “record-keeping” topic, issue 24 on the issues list. * IRT: Please provide any additional feedback you have no later than Monday, 28 August, on the IP framework (issue 20 on the issues list), particularly the issue raised on the call, regarding the proposed addition of language from the framework’s introduction in the Final Report. * IRT: Please provide any additional feedback you have no later than Monday, 28 August, on the “business dealings” section of the PPAA draft (issue 25 on the issues list). * ICANN will review the “business dealings” section of the PPAA draft, per IRT feedback, to ensure that the language (when read in consultation with the rest of the contract) will not result in duplicative notice requirements (ie, customers should receive one notice (e.g. data accuracy notices), either from the provider or registrar—not both). Finally, you will notice that we are moving fairly quickly to the end of the issues list (albeit with many action items to follow up on). Please send any additional points related to the PPAA draft that you would like to discuss to the list. Once we reach the end of the issues list, if we have no further suggestions from you, we will move on to other topics. For next week’s call, we are planning to discuss data escrow and RDDS labeling. I will confirm this by Monday morning Eastern Time at the latest (we are currently working to finalize an updated draft specification for your review). Best, Amy Amy E. Bivins Registrar Services and Engagement Senior Manager Registrar Services and Industry Relations Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Direct: +1 (202) 249-7551 Fax: +1 (202) 789-0104 Email: amy.bivins@icann.org<mailto:amy.bivins@icann.org> www.icann.org<http://www.icann.org>
Great! Also, one more item. This is regarding Section 3.13 of the PPAA. The Final report says: P/P service providers must maintain a point of contact for abuse reporting purposes. In this regard, a “designated” rather than a “dedicated” point of contact will be sufficient, since the primary concern is to have one contact point that third parties can go to and expect a response from. For clarification, the WG notes that as long as the requirement for a single point of contact can be fulfilled operationally, it is not mandating that a provider designate a specific individual to handle such reports. But the PPAA says: 3.13.1 Provider shall establish and maintain a designated Abuse contact to receive reports of Abuse involving Registered Names for which Provider is providing the Services, including reports of Illegal Activity. Provider shall publish (i) an email address to receive such reports on the home page of Provider’s website or (ii) other mechanisms, such as a telephone number or an electronic form, that are clearly visible on Provider’s website homepage (or, in each case, in another standardized place that may be designated by ICANN from time to time), which shall be monitored 24 hours a day, seven days a week. Based on the recommendations of the Final report, we need to have 3.13.1 of the PPAA revised to remove the 24/7 requirement. Thanks, Sara sara bockey policy manager | GoDaddy™ sbockey@godaddy.com 480-366-3616 skype: sbockey This email message and any attachments hereto is intended for use only by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain confidential information. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender and permanently delete the original and any copy of this message and its attachments. From: <gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Amy Bivins <amy.bivins@icann.org> Reply-To: "gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org" <gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org> Date: Tuesday, August 29, 2017 at 5:43 AM To: "gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org" <gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org> Subject: Re: [Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl] Notes, Action Items from 22 August PP IRT Call [PLEASE complete poll] Hi Sara, Yes, you are correct. We have added that language to the next version (draft v2) but that draft won’t be distributed to the IRT until we are through this first round of discussions (to avoid the need for many more rounds of edits to the draft). Best, Amy From: gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces@icann.org [mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Sara Bockey Sent: Monday, August 28, 2017 4:11 PM To: gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org Subject: Re: [Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl] Notes, Action Items from 22 August PP IRT Call [PLEASE complete poll] Hi Amy, I was just looking over the “clean” version of the PPAA and noticed that the new language for 3.5.4.1 has not been incorporated. I believe we were wanting the language to read more along the lines of “…or its failure to respond to Provider inquiries within the time frame required by Provider’s Terms of Service (not to exceed (15) days) …” thanks Sara sara bockey policy manager | GoDaddy™ sbockey@godaddy.com<mailto:sbockey@godaddy.com> 480-366-3616 skype: sbockey This email message and any attachments hereto is intended for use only by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain confidential information. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender and permanently delete the original and any copy of this message and its attachments. From: <gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces@icann.org<mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces@icann.org>> on behalf of Amy Bivins <amy.bivins@icann.org<mailto:amy.bivins@icann.org>> Reply-To: "gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org<mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org>" <gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org<mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org>> Date: Wednesday, August 23, 2017 at 7:00 AM To: "gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org<mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org>" <gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org<mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org>> Subject: [Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl] Notes, Action Items from 22 August PP IRT Call [PLEASE complete poll] Hello, All, Thanks so much for your active participation on yesterday’s Privacy/Proxy IRT call. For those of you would could not attend, I encourage you to please listen to the recording, available on the wiki, https://community.icann.org/display/IRT/22+August+2017. Several action items resulted from this meeting: * IRT: Please complete this linked poll regarding the proposed edit to the LEA framework, specification 4 of the draft PPAA, https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/2F5BGBG, no later than next Monday, 28 August. Please read the background before the first question carefully. * The IRT discussion on this topic yesterday continued to demonstrate a division among the group regarding this proposed edit. The results of this poll will not be counted as a vote but are intended to ensure that we have a complete record and understanding of all IRT participants’ opinions on this topic. This is important. Please participate. There are only two substantive questions. * IRT: Please provide any additional feedback no later than Monday, 28 August, on the “record-keeping” topic, issue 24 on the issues list. * IRT: Please provide any additional feedback you have no later than Monday, 28 August, on the IP framework (issue 20 on the issues list), particularly the issue raised on the call, regarding the proposed addition of language from the framework’s introduction in the Final Report. * IRT: Please provide any additional feedback you have no later than Monday, 28 August, on the “business dealings” section of the PPAA draft (issue 25 on the issues list). * ICANN will review the “business dealings” section of the PPAA draft, per IRT feedback, to ensure that the language (when read in consultation with the rest of the contract) will not result in duplicative notice requirements (ie, customers should receive one notice (e.g. data accuracy notices), either from the provider or registrar—not both). Finally, you will notice that we are moving fairly quickly to the end of the issues list (albeit with many action items to follow up on). Please send any additional points related to the PPAA draft that you would like to discuss to the list. Once we reach the end of the issues list, if we have no further suggestions from you, we will move on to other topics. For next week’s call, we are planning to discuss data escrow and RDDS labeling. I will confirm this by Monday morning Eastern Time at the latest (we are currently working to finalize an updated draft specification for your review). Best, Amy Amy E. Bivins Registrar Services and Engagement Senior Manager Registrar Services and Industry Relations Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Direct: +1 (202) 249-7551 Fax: +1 (202) 789-0104 Email: amy.bivins@icann.org<mailto:amy.bivins@icann.org> www.icann.org<http://www.icann.org>
Makes sense Sara, Thanks Theo On 29-8-2017 15:51, Sara Bockey wrote:
Great! Also, one more item. This is regarding Section 3.13 of the PPAA.
The Final report says: P/P service providers must maintain a point of contact for abuse reporting purposes. In this regard, a “designated” rather than a “dedicated” point of contact will be sufficient, since the primary concern is to have one contact point that third parties can go to and expect a response from. For clarification, the WG notes that as long as the requirement for a single point of contact can be fulfilled operationally, it is not mandating that a provider designate a specific individual to handle such reports.
But the PPAA says: 3.13.1 Provider shall establish and maintain a designated Abuse contact to receive reports of Abuse involving Registered Names for which Provider is providing the Services, including reports of Illegal Activity. Provider shall publish (i) an email address to receive such reports on the home page of Provider’s website or (ii) other mechanisms, such as a telephone number or an electronic form, that are clearly visible on Provider’s website homepage (or, in each case, in another standardized place that may be designated by ICANN from time to time), _which shall be monitored 24 hours a day, seven days a week_.
Based on the recommendations of the Final report, _we need to have 3.13.1 of the PPAA revised to remove the 24/7 requirement_.
Thanks,
Sara
*sara bockey*
*policy manager | **Go**Daddy^™ *
*sbockey@godaddy.com 480-366-3616*
*skype: sbockey*
/This email message and any attachments hereto is intended for use only by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain confidential information. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender and permanently delete the original and any copy of this message and its attachments./
*From: *<gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Amy Bivins <amy.bivins@icann.org> *Reply-To: *"gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org" <gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org> *Date: *Tuesday, August 29, 2017 at 5:43 AM *To: *"gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org" <gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org> *Subject: *Re: [Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl] Notes, Action Items from 22 August PP IRT Call [PLEASE complete poll]
Hi Sara,
Yes, you are correct. We have added that language to the next version (draft v2) but that draft won’t be distributed to the IRT until we are through this first round of discussions (to avoid the need for many more rounds of edits to the draft).
Best,
Amy
*From:* gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces@icann.org [mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces@icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Sara Bockey *Sent:* Monday, August 28, 2017 4:11 PM *To:* gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org *Subject:* Re: [Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl] Notes, Action Items from 22 August PP IRT Call [PLEASE complete poll]
Hi Amy,
I was just looking over the “clean” version of the PPAA and noticed that the new language for 3.5.4.1 has not been incorporated. I believe we were wanting the language to read more along the lines of “…*or its failure to respond to Provider inquiries within the time frame required by Provider’s Terms of Service (not to exceed (15) days) …”*
**
thanks
Sara
*sara bockey*
*policy manager | **Go**Daddy^™ *
*sbockey@godaddy.com <mailto:sbockey@godaddy.com> 480-366-3616*
*skype: sbockey*
/This email message and any attachments hereto is intended for use only by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain confidential information. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender and permanently delete the original and any copy of this message and its attachments./
*From: *<gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces@icann.org <mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces@icann.org>> on behalf of Amy Bivins <amy.bivins@icann.org <mailto:amy.bivins@icann.org>> *Reply-To: *"gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org <mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org>" <gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org <mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org>> *Date: *Wednesday, August 23, 2017 at 7:00 AM *To: *"gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org <mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org>" <gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org <mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org>> *Subject: *[Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl] Notes, Action Items from 22 August PP IRT Call [PLEASE complete poll]
Hello, All,
Thanks so much for your active participation on yesterday’s Privacy/Proxy IRT call. For those of you would could not attend, I encourage you to please listen to the recording, available on the wiki, https://community.icann.org/display/IRT/22+August+2017.
Several action items resulted from this meeting:
* *IRT: * Please complete this linked poll regarding the proposed edit to the LEA framework, specification 4 of the draft PPAA, https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/2F5BGBG, *no later than next Monday, 28 August. *Please read the background before the first question carefully. o The IRT discussion on this topic yesterday continued to demonstrate a division among the group regarding this proposed edit. The results of this poll will not be counted as a vote but are intended to ensure that we have a complete record and understanding of all IRT participants’ opinions on this topic. This is important. Please participate. There are only two substantive questions. * *IRT: * Please provide any additional feedback *no later than Monday, 28 August*, on the “record-keeping” topic, issue 24 on the issues list. * *IRT: * Please provide any additional feedback you have *no later than Monday, 28 August*, on the IP framework (issue 20 on the issues list), particularly the issue raised on the call, regarding the proposed addition of language from the framework’s introduction in the Final Report. * *IRT: * Please provide any additional feedback you have *no later than Monday, 28 August,* on the “business dealings” section of the PPAA draft (issue 25 on the issues list). * *ICANN * will review the “business dealings” section of the PPAA draft, per IRT feedback, to ensure that the language (when read in consultation with the rest of the contract) will not result in duplicative notice requirements (ie, customers should receive one notice (e.g. data accuracy notices), either from the provider or registrar—not both).
**
*Finally, you will notice that we are moving fairly quickly to the end of the issues list (albeit with many action items to follow up on). Please send any additional points related to the PPAA draft that you would like to discuss to the list. Once we reach the end of the issues list, if we have no further suggestions from you, we will move on to other topics.*
**
For next week’s call, we are planning to discuss data escrow and RDDS labeling. I will confirm this by Monday morning Eastern Time at the latest (we are currently working to finalize an updated draft specification for your review).
Best,
Amy
*Amy E. Bivins*
Registrar Services and Engagement Senior Manager
Registrar Services and Industry Relations
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
Direct: +1 (202) 249-7551
Fax: +1 (202) 789-0104
Email: amy.bivins@icann.org <mailto:amy.bivins@icann.org>
www.icann.org <http://www.icann.org>
_______________________________________________ Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl mailing list Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl
participants (5)
-
Amy Bivins -
Margie Milam -
Metalitz, Steven -
Sara Bockey -
theo geurts