Dear all, Please find attached the Charter (pdf and word version) with some redlined additions based on the comments that Yoav send to the GNSO Council a few days ago (see pp.4-5). Please take a minute to review these and feel free to voice your thoughts on the list as this may speed up the discussions during next week's call. Many thanks and best wishes, Lars
Dear all, I am in favour of the changes and have two suggestions for bullet points on p.4: I think the second one should be split into two questions: Orig. Should translation/transliteration of contact data be mandatory for all gTLDs and all registrants or only those based in certain countries? -> Should translation/transliteration of contact data be mandatory for all gTLDs? Should it be mandatory for all registrants or only those based in certain countries? Is the third bullet point actually better replaced by something like "When should the WG's recommendations come into effect?"? Orig. <- What impact will translation/transliteration of contact data have on the whois validation as set out under the 2013 RAA? Regards, Chris. -- Research Associate in Linguistic Computing, Centre for Digital Humanities, UCL, Gower St, London WC1E 6BT Tel +44 20 7679 1599 (int 31599) ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon From: owner-gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@icann.org] On Behalf Of Lars Hoffmann Sent: 31 October 2013 13:52 To: gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@icann.org Cc: Volker Greimann Subject: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] Updated Charter Dear all, Please find attached the Charter (pdf and word version) with some redlined additions based on the comments that Yoav send to the GNSO Council a few days ago (see pp.4-5). Please take a minute to review these and feel free to voice your thoughts on the list as this may speed up the discussions during next week's call. Many thanks and best wishes, Lars
Dear Chris, I think the modification to the second bullet point on p.4. as mentioned by you is good. while the modification to third point changes the meaning from the original, please check. Regards, Vinay From: c.dillon@ucl.ac.uk To: lars.hoffmann@icann.org; gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@icann.org CC: vgreimann@key-systems.net Subject: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] RE: Updated Charter Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 14:44:47 +0000 Dear all, I am in favour of the changes and have two suggestions for bullet points on p.4: I think the second one should be split into two questions: Orig. Should translation/transliteration of contact data be mandatory for all gTLDs and all registrants or only those based in certain countries? -> Should translation/transliteration of contact data be mandatory for all gTLDs? Should it be mandatory for all registrants or only those based in certain countries? Is the third bullet point actually better replaced by something like “When should the WG’s recommendations come into effect?”? Orig. <- What impact will translation/transliteration of contact data have on the whois validation as set out under the 2013 RAA? Regards, Chris. -- Research Associate in Linguistic Computing, Centre for Digital Humanities, UCL, Gower St, London WC1E 6BT Tel +44 20 7679 1599 (int 31599) ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon From: owner-gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@icann.org] On Behalf Of Lars Hoffmann Sent: 31 October 2013 13:52 To: gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@icann.org Cc: Volker Greimann Subject: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] Updated Charter Dear all, Please find attached the Charter (pdf and word version) with some redlined additions based on the comments that Yoav send to the GNSO Council a few days ago (see pp.4-5). Please take a minute to review these and feel free to voice your thoughts on the list as this may speed up the discussions during next week's call. Many thanks and best wishes, Lars
Dear Vinay, Thank you for that. The reason for my change in the 3rd point is the possibility that the WG could stipulate something not covered by the 2013 RAA. If the WG were to do that, the key issue would be when the WG's decision would come into effect, as it would not be possible to have two contradictory policy statements at the same time. The when question is possibly better in addition to, rather than instead of the 3rd point. Regards, Chris. -- Research Associate in Linguistic Computing, Centre for Digital Humanities, UCL, Gower St, London WC1E 6BT Tel +44 20 7679 1599 (int 31599) ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon From: vinay kumar singh [mailto:vinaysingh85@hotmail.com] Sent: 01 November 2013 17:12 To: Dillon, Chris; Lars Hoffmann; gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@icann.org Cc: Volker Greimann Subject: RE: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] RE: Updated Charter Dear Chris, I think the modification to the second bullet point on p.4. as mentioned by you is good. while the modification to third point changes the meaning from the original, please check. Regards, Vinay ________________________________ From: c.dillon@ucl.ac.uk<mailto:c.dillon@ucl.ac.uk> To: lars.hoffmann@icann.org<mailto:lars.hoffmann@icann.org>; gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@icann.org<mailto:gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@icann.org> CC: vgreimann@key-systems.net<mailto:vgreimann@key-systems.net> Subject: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] RE: Updated Charter Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 14:44:47 +0000 Dear all, I am in favour of the changes and have two suggestions for bullet points on p.4: I think the second one should be split into two questions: Orig. Should translation/transliteration of contact data be mandatory for all gTLDs and all registrants or only those based in certain countries? -> Should translation/transliteration of contact data be mandatory for all gTLDs? Should it be mandatory for all registrants or only those based in certain countries? Is the third bullet point actually better replaced by something like "When should the WG's recommendations come into effect?"? Orig. <- What impact will translation/transliteration of contact data have on the whois validation as set out under the 2013 RAA? Regards, Chris. -- Research Associate in Linguistic Computing, Centre for Digital Humanities, UCL, Gower St, London WC1E 6BT Tel +44 20 7679 1599 (int 31599) ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon From: owner-gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@icann.org<mailto:owner-gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@icann.org> [mailto:owner-gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@icann.org] On Behalf Of Lars Hoffmann Sent: 31 October 2013 13:52 To: gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@icann.org<mailto:gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@icann.org> Cc: Volker Greimann Subject: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] Updated Charter Dear all, Please find attached the Charter (pdf and word version) with some redlined additions based on the comments that Yoav send to the GNSO Council a few days ago (see pp.4-5). Please take a minute to review these and feel free to voice your thoughts on the list as this may speed up the discussions during next week's call. Many thanks and best wishes, Lars
Dear Chris, Thanks, this seems fine with the explanantion. Regards, Vinay From: c.dillon@ucl.ac.uk To: vinaysingh85@hotmail.com; lars.hoffmann@icann.org; gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@icann.org CC: vgreimann@key-Systems.net Subject: RE: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] RE: Updated Charter Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2013 12:11:58 +0000 Dear Vinay, Thank you for that. The reason for my change in the 3rd point is the possibility that the WG could stipulate something not covered by the 2013 RAA. If the WG were to do that, the key issue would be when the WG’s decision would come into effect, as it would not be possible to have two contradictory policy statements at the same time. The when question is possibly better in addition to, rather than instead of the 3rd point. Regards, Chris. -- Research Associate in Linguistic Computing, Centre for Digital Humanities, UCL, Gower St, London WC1E 6BT Tel +44 20 7679 1599 (int 31599) ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon From: vinay kumar singh [mailto:vinaysingh85@hotmail.com] Sent: 01 November 2013 17:12 To: Dillon, Chris; Lars Hoffmann; gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@icann.org Cc: Volker Greimann Subject: RE: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] RE: Updated Charter Dear Chris, I think the modification to the second bullet point on p.4. as mentioned by you is good. while the modification to third point changes the meaning from the original, please check. Regards, Vinay From: c.dillon@ucl.ac.uk To: lars.hoffmann@icann.org; gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@icann.org CC: vgreimann@key-systems.net Subject: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] RE: Updated Charter Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 14:44:47 +0000 Dear all, I am in favour of the changes and have two suggestions for bullet points on p.4: I think the second one should be split into two questions: Orig. Should translation/transliteration of contact data be mandatory for all gTLDs and all registrants or only those based in certain countries? -> Should translation/transliteration of contact data be mandatory for all gTLDs? Should it be mandatory for all registrants or only those based in certain countries? Is the third bullet point actually better replaced by something like “When should the WG’s recommendations come into effect?”? Orig. <- What impact will translation/transliteration of contact data have on the whois validation as set out under the 2013 RAA? Regards, Chris. -- Research Associate in Linguistic Computing, Centre for Digital Humanities, UCL, Gower St, London WC1E 6BT Tel +44 20 7679 1599 (int 31599) ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon From: owner-gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@icann.org] On Behalf Of Lars Hoffmann Sent: 31 October 2013 13:52 To: gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@icann.org Cc: Volker Greimann Subject: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] Updated Charter Dear all, Please find attached the Charter (pdf and word version) with some redlined additions based on the comments that Yoav send to the GNSO Council a few days ago (see pp.4-5). Please take a minute to review these and feel free to voice your thoughts on the list as this may speed up the discussions during next week's call. Many thanks and best wishes, Lars
Hi all, the main direction of the question with regard to the 2013 RAA was to clarify the impact (if any) on the validation requirement in the new RAA caused by transliteration and translation, whereunder a registrar is required to check if an address is presented in the correct format, as valid formats may be wildly different depending on the script used and therefore a new level of complexity could be added that needs to be assessed. Best, Volker
Dear Vinay,
Thank you for that.
The reason for my change in the 3^rd point is the possibility that the WG could stipulate something not covered by the 2013 RAA. If the WG were to do that, the key issue would be when the WG's decision would come into effect, as it would not be possible to have two contradictory policy statements at the same time. The when question is possibly better in addition to, rather than instead of the 3^rd point.
Regards,
Chris.
--
Research Associate in Linguistic Computing, Centre for Digital Humanities, UCL, Gower St, London WC1E 6BT Tel +44 20 7679 1599 (int 31599) ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon
*From:*vinay kumar singh [mailto:vinaysingh85@hotmail.com] *Sent:* 01 November 2013 17:12 *To:* Dillon, Chris; Lars Hoffmann; gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@icann.org *Cc:* Volker Greimann *Subject:* RE: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] RE: Updated Charter
Dear Chris,
I think the modification to the second bullet point on p.4. as mentioned by you is good. while the modification to third point changes the meaning from the original, please check.
Regards, Vinay
------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: c.dillon@ucl.ac.uk <mailto:c.dillon@ucl.ac.uk> To: lars.hoffmann@icann.org <mailto:lars.hoffmann@icann.org>; gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@icann.org <mailto:gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@icann.org> CC: vgreimann@key-systems.net <mailto:vgreimann@key-systems.net> Subject: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] RE: Updated Charter Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 14:44:47 +0000
Dear all,
I am in favour of the changes and have two suggestions for bullet points on p.4:
I think the second one should be split into two questions:
/Orig. Should translation/transliteration of contact data be mandatory for all gTLDs and all registrants or only those based in certain countries? ->/
Should translation/transliteration of contact data be mandatory for all gTLDs? Should it be mandatory for all registrants or only those based in certain countries?
Is the third bullet point actually better replaced by something like "When should the WG's recommendations come into effect?"?
/Orig. <- What impact will translation/transliteration of contact data have on the whois validation as set out under the 2013 RAA?/
Regards,
Chris.
--
Research Associate in Linguistic Computing, Centre for Digital Humanities, UCL, Gower St, London WC1E 6BT Tel +44 20 7679 1599 (int 31599) ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon
*From:*owner-gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@icann.org <mailto:owner-gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@icann.org> [mailto:owner-gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Lars Hoffmann *Sent:* 31 October 2013 13:52 *To:* gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@icann.org <mailto:gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@icann.org> *Cc:* Volker Greimann *Subject:* [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] Updated Charter
Dear all,
Please find attached the Charter (pdf and word version) with some redlined additions based on the comments that Yoav send to the GNSO Council a few days ago (see pp.4-5). Please take a minute to review these and feel free to voice your thoughts on the list as this may speed up the discussions during next week's call.
Many thanks and best wishes,
Lars
-- Bei weiteren Fragen stehen wir Ihnen gerne zur Verfügung. Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Volker A. Greimann - Rechtsabteilung - Key-Systems GmbH Im Oberen Werk 1 66386 St. Ingbert Tel.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 901 Fax.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 851 Email: vgreimann@key-systems.net Web: www.key-systems.net / www.RRPproxy.net www.domaindiscount24.com / www.BrandShelter.com Folgen Sie uns bei Twitter oder werden Sie unser Fan bei Facebook: www.facebook.com/KeySystems www.twitter.com/key_systems Geschäftsführer: Alexander Siffrin Handelsregister Nr.: HR B 18835 - Saarbruecken Umsatzsteuer ID.: DE211006534 Member of the KEYDRIVE GROUP www.keydrive.lu Der Inhalt dieser Nachricht ist vertraulich und nur für den angegebenen Empfänger bestimmt. Jede Form der Kenntnisgabe, Veröffentlichung oder Weitergabe an Dritte durch den Empfänger ist unzulässig. Sollte diese Nachricht nicht für Sie bestimmt sein, so bitten wir Sie, sich mit uns per E-Mail oder telefonisch in Verbindung zu setzen. -------------------------------------------- Should you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact us. Best regards, Volker A. Greimann - legal department - Key-Systems GmbH Im Oberen Werk 1 66386 St. Ingbert Tel.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 901 Fax.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 851 Email: vgreimann@key-systems.net Web: www.key-systems.net / www.RRPproxy.net www.domaindiscount24.com / www.BrandShelter.com Follow us on Twitter or join our fan community on Facebook and stay updated: www.facebook.com/KeySystems www.twitter.com/key_systems CEO: Alexander Siffrin Registration No.: HR B 18835 - Saarbruecken V.A.T. ID.: DE211006534 Member of the KEYDRIVE GROUP www.keydrive.lu This e-mail and its attachments is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. Furthermore it is not permitted to publish any content of this email. You must not use, disclose, copy, print or rely on this e-mail. If an addressing or transmission error has misdirected this e-mail, kindly notify the author by replying to this e-mail or contacting us by telephone.
participants (4)
-
Dillon, Chris -
Lars Hoffmann -
vinay kumar singh -
Volker Greimann