Dear Chris, I think the modification to the second bullet point on p.4. as mentioned by you is good. while the modification to third point changes the meaning from the original, please check. Regards, Vinay From: c.dillon@ucl.ac.uk To: lars.hoffmann@icann.org; gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@icann.org CC: vgreimann@key-systems.net Subject: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] RE: Updated Charter Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 14:44:47 +0000 Dear all, I am in favour of the changes and have two suggestions for bullet points on p.4: I think the second one should be split into two questions: Orig. Should translation/transliteration of contact data be mandatory for all gTLDs and all registrants or only those based in certain countries? -> Should translation/transliteration of contact data be mandatory for all gTLDs? Should it be mandatory for all registrants or only those based in certain countries? Is the third bullet point actually better replaced by something like “When should the WG’s recommendations come into effect?”? Orig. <- What impact will translation/transliteration of contact data have on the whois validation as set out under the 2013 RAA? Regards, Chris. -- Research Associate in Linguistic Computing, Centre for Digital Humanities, UCL, Gower St, London WC1E 6BT Tel +44 20 7679 1599 (int 31599) ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon From: owner-gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@icann.org] On Behalf Of Lars Hoffmann Sent: 31 October 2013 13:52 To: gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@icann.org Cc: Volker Greimann Subject: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] Updated Charter Dear all, Please find attached the Charter (pdf and word version) with some redlined additions based on the comments that Yoav send to the GNSO Council a few days ago (see pp.4-5). Please take a minute to review these and feel free to voice your thoughts on the list as this may speed up the discussions during next week's call. Many thanks and best wishes, Lars