Please Comment: Request for Input Letters
Dear all, In case there were any problems opening the .docx document from my previous email, here are the documents again, both in .doc versions. As Julie mentioned earlier, if we do not hear any objections we will send the GACinput letter as well as those to the GNSO's SG/C and ICANN's AC/SO out tomorrow. Best wishes, Lars From: Lars Hoffmann <lars.hoffmann@icann.org<mailto:lars.hoffmann@icann.org>> Date: Friday, January 24, 2014 4:30 PM To: "gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@icann.org<mailto:gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@icann.org>" <gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@icann.org<mailto:gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@icann.org>> Subject: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] Please Comment: Request for Input Letters Dear all, Having consulted with our Senior Director for GAC relations, Olof Nordling, I have slightly extended the letter based on his input. In addition, please also find attached a letter that you might want to send out to individual GAC members; you can find the list of current GAC here Representatives - https://gacweb.icann.org/display/gacweb/GAC+Representatives. As you see email addresses are provided for both so we could send the letter to those members you might think are most useful. Many thanks and best wishes, Lars From: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@icann.org<mailto:julie.hedlund@icann.org>> Date: Thursday, January 23, 2014 4:32 PM To: "gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@icann.org<mailto:gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@icann.org>" <gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@icann.org<mailto:gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@icann.org>> Subject: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] Please Comment: Request for Input Letters Dear PDP WG members, Per the action items from today's meeting attached are two letters. One is for the GAC and one is for the other SOs and ACs. These also are posted to the wiki at https://community.icann.org/display/tatcipdp/23+January+2014 under "For Review." The action is to finalize these letters so that they can be sent by Friday, 31 January. Please send any comments, questions, or changes to this list by COB Tuesday, 28 January. Staff will compile the changes and send revised versions for approval by 30 January on the list. Best regards, Julie Julie Hedlund, Policy Director
I don’t have any objections. I have made a couple of editorial suggestions to these letters for your consideration. The most notable thing I did was change “contact data” to be “contact information” wherever it appeared. I feel we should be consistent with our terminology. I’m okay if you want to use something other than “contact information”. I have attached redlined documents for your review. Jim On 30 Jan 2014, at 10:08 AM, Lars Hoffmann <lars.hoffmann@icann.org> wrote:
Dear all, In case there were any problems opening the .docx document from my previous email, here are the documents again, both in .doc versions. As Julie mentioned earlier, if we do not hear any objections we will send the GACinput letter as well as those to the GNSO's SG/C and ICANN's AC/SO out tomorrow. Best wishes, Lars
From: Lars Hoffmann <lars.hoffmann@icann.org> Date: Friday, January 24, 2014 4:30 PM To: "gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@icann.org" <gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@icann.org> Subject: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] Please Comment: Request for Input Letters
Dear all, Having consulted with our Senior Director for GAC relations, Olof Nordling, I have slightly extended the letter based on his input. In addition, please also find attached a letter that you might want to send out to individual GAC members; you can find the list of current GAC here Representatives - https://gacweb.icann.org/display/gacweb/GAC+Representatives. As you see email addresses are provided for both so we could send the letter to those members you might think are most useful. Many thanks and best wishes, Lars
From: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@icann.org> Date: Thursday, January 23, 2014 4:32 PM To: "gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@icann.org" <gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@icann.org> Subject: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] Please Comment: Request for Input Letters
Dear PDP WG members,
Per the action items from today's meeting attached are two letters. One is for the GAC and one is for the other SOs and ACs. These also are posted to the wiki at https://community.icann.org/display/tatcipdp/23+January+2014 under "For Review." The action is to finalize these letters so that they can be sent by Friday, 31 January. Please send any comments, questions, or changes to this list by COB Tuesday, 28 January. Staff will compile the changes and send revised versions for approval by 30 January on the list.
Best regards,
Julie
Julie Hedlund, Policy Director <GACinput_final.doc><individual GAC Letter_v2.doc><Request for Input to SO-AC 23 January 2014.doc>
Dear Jim, So far the commonly used term is "contact information" so we should standardise on that. As regards definitions, I notice that we aren't using the word "transcribe", but it's probably best to leave it in the definitions section for the time being. I can't spot anything in the letters apart from what you have. Regards, Chris. -- Research Associate in Linguistic Computing, Centre for Digital Humanities, UCL, Gower St, London WC1E 6BT Tel +44 20 7679 1599 (int 31599) ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon On 30/01/2014 16:27, "James M. Galvin" <jgalvin@afilias.info> wrote:
I don¹t have any objections. I have made a couple of editorial suggestions to these letters for your consideration. The most notable thing I did was change ³contact data² to be ³contact information² wherever it appeared. I feel we should be consistent with our terminology. I¹m okay if you want to use something other than ³contact information².
I have attached redlined documents for your review.
Jim
participants (3)
-
Dillon, Chris -
James M. Galvin -
Lars Hoffmann