Hello Maxim, Regarding your minority view of starting Operational Track 1 only after the completion of Policy Track 2, we already have a paragraph on page 9 of the document to reflect it: Note that there is a minority view that the IDN Implementation Guidelines is not already GNSO policy and therefore any discussion on implementation -- Operational Track 1 -- should only be pursued after the Policy Track 2 has completed. Please let us know if this is not adequate. Thank you, Ariel From: Maxim Alzoba <m.alzoba@gmail.com> Date: Wednesday, January 15, 2020 at 12:08 PM To: Ariel Liang <ariel.liang@icann.org> Cc: "gnso-council-idn-scoping@icann.org" <gnso-council-idn-scoping@icann.org> Subject: [Ext] Re: [GNSO-Council-IDN-Scoping] FINAL CALL: IDN Scoping Team Draft Final Report - End on Wed 15 Jan EOB Hello Ariel, unfortunately my minority view was not reflected as written (please find the edit in the Google Doc) it was about starting of the implementation of something which is not policy based, and might require significant time spending (Track 1 prior to the Track 2). For some reason it became only concern about EPDP, which is not full reflection of our discussions. Sincerely Yours, Maxim Alzoba Special projects manager, International Relations Department, FAITID m. +7 916 6761580(+whatsapp) skype oldfrogger Current UTC offset: +3.00 (.Moscow) On 9 Jan 2020, at 19:48, Ariel Liang via gnso-council-IDN-scoping <gnso-council-idn-scoping@icann.org<mailto:gnso-council-idn-scoping@icann.org>> wrote: Dear All, Per action item, today starts the final call of the IDN Scoping Team Draft Final Report to be delivered to the GNSO Council. Please find the draft final report in WORD document attached. A Google Doc [docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__docs.google.com_documen...> version is also available. Kindly note that this version has incorporated the latest suggested edits from Edmon, in response to the input provided by Maxim. If you have any final input, please insert comment or suggest edits on the Google Doc [docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__docs.google.com_documen...> to prevent any potential version confusion. The final call will end on Wednesday, 15 January EOB. The aim is to deliver the final report to the Council no later than Friday, 17 January. Thank you all for your hard work! Best Regards, Ariel _______________________________________________ gnso-council-IDN-scoping mailing list gnso-council-IDN-scoping@icann.org<mailto:gnso-council-IDN-scoping@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-council-idn-scoping _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy [icann.org]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_privacy_p...>) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos [icann.org]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_privacy_t...>). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.

Hello Maxim, Thanks for noting your comments on the document. Regarding the sentence that you pointed out – I think this sentence intends to say that if some of the issues in the Operational Track 1 are unresolvable, those issues may be pushed into the Policy Track 2 for further deliberation. This should be consistent with the following sentence on page 9 regarding Operational Track 1 work: If unresolvable, the work will inform Policy Track 2 and work done to date will serve as the study on the impacts from the IDN Implementation Guidelines upon the existing RA/RAA. Staff understood that most of the team agreed on this view. We can qualify that sentence by starting with "Most of the team believes that the issues within Operational Track 1 likely do not require policy development, but allows for the possibility that policy development may be needed." Would it work? Ariel From: Maxim Alzoba <m.alzoba@gmail.com> Date: Wednesday, January 15, 2020 at 12:24 PM To: Ariel Liang <ariel.liang@icann.org> Cc: "gnso-council-idn-scoping@icann.org" <gnso-council-idn-scoping@icann.org> Subject: Re: [Ext] Re: [GNSO-Council-IDN-Scoping] FINAL CALL: IDN Scoping Team Draft Final Report - End on Wed 15 Jan EOB Hi Ariel, I think this reading is better than my suggestion. Please proceed with it. though - it contradicts to "The team believes that the issues within Operational Track 1 likely do not require policy development, but allows for the possibility that policy development may be needed." So I think there is a need to merge these two items Sincerely Yours, Maxim Alzoba Special projects manager, International Relations Department, FAITID m. +7 916 6761580(+whatsapp) skype oldfrogger Current UTC offset: +3.00 (.Moscow) On 15 Jan 2020, at 20:17, Ariel Liang <ariel.liang@icann.org<mailto:ariel.liang@icann.org>> wrote: Hello Maxim, Regarding your minority view of starting Operational Track 1 only after the completion of Policy Track 2, we already have a paragraph on page 9 of the document to reflect it: Note that there is a minority view that the IDN Implementation Guidelines is not already GNSO policy and therefore any discussion on implementation -- Operational Track 1 -- should only be pursued after the Policy Track 2 has completed. Please let us know if this is not adequate. Thank you, Ariel From: Maxim Alzoba <m.alzoba@gmail.com<mailto:m.alzoba@gmail.com>> Date: Wednesday, January 15, 2020 at 12:08 PM To: Ariel Liang <ariel.liang@icann.org<mailto:ariel.liang@icann.org>> Cc: "gnso-council-idn-scoping@icann.org<mailto:gnso-council-idn-scoping@icann.org>" <gnso-council-idn-scoping@icann.org<mailto:gnso-council-idn-scoping@icann.org>> Subject: [Ext] Re: [GNSO-Council-IDN-Scoping] FINAL CALL: IDN Scoping Team Draft Final Report - End on Wed 15 Jan EOB Hello Ariel, unfortunately my minority view was not reflected as written (please find the edit in the Google Doc) it was about starting of the implementation of something which is not policy based, and might require significant time spending (Track 1 prior to the Track 2). For some reason it became only concern about EPDP, which is not full reflection of our discussions. Sincerely Yours, Maxim Alzoba Special projects manager, International Relations Department, FAITID m. +7 916 6761580(+whatsapp) skype oldfrogger Current UTC offset: +3.00 (.Moscow) On 9 Jan 2020, at 19:48, Ariel Liang via gnso-council-IDN-scoping <gnso-council-idn-scoping@icann.org<mailto:gnso-council-idn-scoping@icann.org>> wrote: Dear All, Per action item, today starts the final call of the IDN Scoping Team Draft Final Report to be delivered to the GNSO Council. Please find the draft final report in WORD document attached. A Google Doc [docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__docs.google.com_documen...> version is also available. Kindly note that this version has incorporated the latest suggested edits from Edmon, in response to the input provided by Maxim. If you have any final input, please insert comment or suggest edits on the Google Doc [docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__docs.google.com_documen...> to prevent any potential version confusion. The final call will end on Wednesday, 15 January EOB. The aim is to deliver the final report to the Council no later than Friday, 17 January. Thank you all for your hard work! Best Regards, Ariel _______________________________________________ gnso-council-IDN-scoping mailing list gnso-council-IDN-scoping@icann.org<mailto:gnso-council-IDN-scoping@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-council-idn-scoping _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy [icann.org]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_privacy_p...>) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos [icann.org]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_privacy_t...>). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.

Thanks for the review and confirmation, Maxim! Best, Ariel From: Maxim Alzoba <m.alzoba@gmail.com> Date: Wednesday, January 15, 2020 at 1:05 PM To: Ariel Liang <ariel.liang@icann.org> Cc: "gnso-council-idn-scoping@icann.org" <gnso-council-idn-scoping@icann.org> Subject: Re: [Ext] Re: [GNSO-Council-IDN-Scoping] FINAL CALL: IDN Scoping Team Draft Final Report - End on Wed 15 Jan EOB Ariel, I think combined these edits are fine. Sincerely Yours, Maxim Alzoba Special projects manager, International Relations Department, FAITID m. +7 916 6761580(+whatsapp) skype oldfrogger Current UTC offset: +3.00 (.Moscow) On 15 Jan 2020, at 20:48, Ariel Liang <ariel.liang@icann.org<mailto:ariel.liang@icann.org>> wrote: Hello Maxim, Thanks for noting your comments on the document. Regarding the sentence that you pointed out – I think this sentence intends to say that if some of the issues in the Operational Track 1 are unresolvable, those issues may be pushed into the Policy Track 2 for further deliberation. This should be consistent with the following sentence on page 9 regarding Operational Track 1 work: If unresolvable, the work will inform Policy Track 2 and work done to date will serve as the study on the impacts from the IDN Implementation Guidelines upon the existing RA/RAA. Staff understood that most of the team agreed on this view. We can qualify that sentence by starting with "Most of the team believes that the issues within Operational Track 1 likely do not require policy development, but allows for the possibility that policy development may be needed." Would it work? Ariel From: Maxim Alzoba <m.alzoba@gmail.com<mailto:m.alzoba@gmail.com>> Date: Wednesday, January 15, 2020 at 12:24 PM To: Ariel Liang <ariel.liang@icann.org<mailto:ariel.liang@icann.org>> Cc: "gnso-council-idn-scoping@icann.org<mailto:gnso-council-idn-scoping@icann.org>" <gnso-council-idn-scoping@icann.org<mailto:gnso-council-idn-scoping@icann.org>> Subject: Re: [Ext] Re: [GNSO-Council-IDN-Scoping] FINAL CALL: IDN Scoping Team Draft Final Report - End on Wed 15 Jan EOB Hi Ariel, I think this reading is better than my suggestion. Please proceed with it. though - it contradicts to "The team believes that the issues within Operational Track 1 likely do not require policy development, but allows for the possibility that policy development may be needed." So I think there is a need to merge these two items Sincerely Yours, Maxim Alzoba Special projects manager, International Relations Department, FAITID m. +7 916 6761580(+whatsapp) skype oldfrogger Current UTC offset: +3.00 (.Moscow) On 15 Jan 2020, at 20:17, Ariel Liang <ariel.liang@icann.org<mailto:ariel.liang@icann.org>> wrote: Hello Maxim, Regarding your minority view of starting Operational Track 1 only after the completion of Policy Track 2, we already have a paragraph on page 9 of the document to reflect it: Note that there is a minority view that the IDN Implementation Guidelines is not already GNSO policy and therefore any discussion on implementation -- Operational Track 1 -- should only be pursued after the Policy Track 2 has completed. Please let us know if this is not adequate. Thank you, Ariel From: Maxim Alzoba <m.alzoba@gmail.com<mailto:m.alzoba@gmail.com>> Date: Wednesday, January 15, 2020 at 12:08 PM To: Ariel Liang <ariel.liang@icann.org<mailto:ariel.liang@icann.org>> Cc: "gnso-council-idn-scoping@icann.org<mailto:gnso-council-idn-scoping@icann.org>" <gnso-council-idn-scoping@icann.org<mailto:gnso-council-idn-scoping@icann.org>> Subject: [Ext] Re: [GNSO-Council-IDN-Scoping] FINAL CALL: IDN Scoping Team Draft Final Report - End on Wed 15 Jan EOB Hello Ariel, unfortunately my minority view was not reflected as written (please find the edit in the Google Doc) it was about starting of the implementation of something which is not policy based, and might require significant time spending (Track 1 prior to the Track 2). For some reason it became only concern about EPDP, which is not full reflection of our discussions. Sincerely Yours, Maxim Alzoba Special projects manager, International Relations Department, FAITID m. +7 916 6761580(+whatsapp) skype oldfrogger Current UTC offset: +3.00 (.Moscow) On 9 Jan 2020, at 19:48, Ariel Liang via gnso-council-IDN-scoping <gnso-council-idn-scoping@icann.org<mailto:gnso-council-idn-scoping@icann.org>> wrote: Dear All, Per action item, today starts the final call of the IDN Scoping Team Draft Final Report to be delivered to the GNSO Council. Please find the draft final report in WORD document attached. A Google Doc [docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__docs.google.com_documen...> version is also available. Kindly note that this version has incorporated the latest suggested edits from Edmon, in response to the input provided by Maxim. If you have any final input, please insert comment or suggest edits on the Google Doc [docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__docs.google.com_documen...> to prevent any potential version confusion. The final call will end on Wednesday, 15 January EOB. The aim is to deliver the final report to the Council no later than Friday, 17 January. Thank you all for your hard work! Best Regards, Ariel _______________________________________________ gnso-council-IDN-scoping mailing list gnso-council-IDN-scoping@icann.org<mailto:gnso-council-IDN-scoping@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-council-idn-scoping _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy [icann.org]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_privacy_p...>) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos [icann.org]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_privacy_t...>). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.