With regard to Janvier’s suggestion, maybe we can be more specific. For example: · Availability and clarity of eligibility criteria for funding · # of applications received vs # approved or rejected · Average time of the approval process With regard to Tony’ suggestion, maybe we can add: · Who (eg registrants or registrars) or what groups have benefited from the availability of data/metrics? From: Janvier Noulaye [mailto:jnoulaye@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2015 6:36 AM To: Tony Onorato Cc: Berry Cobb; dmpm@icann.kavi.com; gnso-dmpm-wg@icann.org Subject: [Dmpm] Re: Metrics Request Pilot - DMPM Rec#1 Added to the view of Tony, I would say that, this set of “measure of success” should also show out both the WG satisfaction and the Community satisfaction. /Janvier Ngnoulaye 2015-07-22 20:55 GMT+01:00 Tony Onorato <tony.onorato@fisherbroyles.com>: Berry – My sense is to measure success based on two binary questions: (1) did the WG use data and/or metrics as part of its process (e.g., in scoping/defining the issue, prioritizing the issues under consideration, and/or guiding the WG to an informed recommendation on the issue under consideration), and (2) [was the incorporation of data and/or metrics] [or] [were the data/metrics] useful to the WG in its process? Best, Tony Tony Onorato, Esq./CIPP(US) FisherBroyles, LLP Directs: 202.459.3599/646.397.4750 | Fax: 516.706.9809 | <mailto:tony.onorato@fisherbroyles.com> tony.onorato@fisherbroyles.com | <http://www.fsblegal.com/> fisherbroyles.com From: Berry Cobb [mailto:mail@berrycobb.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2015 3:33 PM To: dmpm@icann.kavi.com; gnso-dmpm-wg@icann.org Subject: [Dmpm] Metrics Request Pilot - DMPM Rec#1 All, In making updates to the next version of our draft initial report, I reminded myself that we also need to include under the recommendation details some set of “measure of success.” I think it will benefit to provide at least a simple idea of success for the community to respond to. Else, I suspect that if comments are not submitted to that regard, it will be asked by the GNSO Council. Please provide input on the list, and I can add the groups ideas to the draft. I will include a placeholder in the document. Thank you. B Berry Cobb Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN) 720.839.5735 mail@berrycobb.com @berrycobb