Nick, congrats. Staff, I was on the call today, using Carplay while cruising on the German Autobahn to the Frankfurt Airport and wanted to make some technical remarks: Carplay Zoom is plain Audio so references to the chat and slides went by me. So should they be summarized if there is any one on Audio only. I think you can see that in the Participant pod. Carplay does not have a touch screen option to raise hand, and touching the phone while driving is dangerous and illegal. I don't have a solution for that. The quality of Zoom is impressive, it automatically increased volume after a second or so if the speaker was faint. The phone quality (Paul) was a bit worse than the ones from the microphones connected directly. I personally use AirPods on the laptop, and a Sennheiser USB-C headset when at home. I reached FRA 15 minutes before the end and my chat was disabled. I checked and the Zoom on my travel phone had me as Nicky Lisse as the default. We have two licenses and I mainly use the other one, but will in the future try and make sure I show the right screen name, so staff can identify me as participant. All in all I was surprised how well this worked. Paul, i wonder about the trigger issue. Are we not re-inventing the wheel here? My understanding is that currently the RAA specifies how to identify an abusive domain and how to mitigate. Please correct me if I am wrong, but that could be the minimal requirement for a trigger. If we use that we have normalized it, so that changes in the current definition of abuse in the RAA would be automatically reflect in the Policy. Now, I have no opinion on how many of those would have to have been (required to be) mitigated in order to trigger "our" investigation (at least one). As far as reasonableness is concerned there are legal definitions, which boil down to "I know it when I see it" :-)-O, so one could look for one or a combination of definitions for our context. With regard to the action the Registrar would have to take, if associated names were found to be abusive, we could again refer to the RAA and use the mitigation described there. Does any of this help? el -- Dr. Eberhard W. Lisse \ / Obstetrician & Gynaecologist (retired) el@lisse.NA / * | Telephone: +264 81 124 6733 (cell) PO Box 8421 Bachbrecht \ / If this email is signed with GPG/PGP 10007, Namibia ;____/ Sect 20 of Act No. 4 of 2019 may apply