Marc, that was emailed in reply, and before the discussion, which has made it much clearer. It has made it also clear to me that we need to report the lack of remedy/recourse after (RAA mitigation) to Council. el On 2026-05-11 15:59, trachtenbergm@gtlaw.com wrote:
Eberhard,
False positives of what? ADC is just a check - mitigation is out of scope and covered by the RAA.
Best regards,
Marc H. Trachtenberg [...] -----Original Message----- From: Dr Eberhard W Lisse via Gnso-dnsabuse-pdp <gnso-dnsabuse-pdp@icann.org> Sent: Monday, May 11, 2026 2:42 PM To: gnso-dnsabuse-pdp@icann.org Cc: el@lisse.NA Subject: [Gnso-dnsabuse-pdp] Re: NCSG Q5 Proposed Language
*EXTERNAL TO GT*
Marc,
While I agree that mitigation in itself is out of scope I also think that it is very important to protect the "innocent", as it were, as is the matter of natural justice, ie giving the other side a chance to be heard. I assume it it self evident that false positives would be restored as a matter of urgency.
el
-- Eberhard W. Lisse \ /Obstetrician & Gynaecologist (retired) el@lisse.NA / * | Telephone: +264 81 124 6733 (cell) PO Box 8421 Bachbrecht\ / If this email is signed with GPG/PGP 10007, Namibia ;____/ Sect 20 of Act No. 4 of 2019 may apply