Yes indeed. Thanks for the correction Justine. Can’t believe it is February already! Thanks to Michael who provided input. We look forwarding to hearing feedback from the rest of the EPDP Team. Best Regards, Ariel On Feb 9, 2022, at 5:31 AM, Justine Chew <justine.chew.icann@gmail.com> wrote: Hi all, I believe Ariel meant to say, .... ... Please provide any input/suggestion for the draft outcome language on the mailing list by Tuesday, 22 February. Any substantive comments will be discussed during the EPDP Team meeting in about two weeks. Cheers, Justine On Wed, 9 Feb 2022 at 08:28, Donna@registry.godaddy <Donna@registry.godaddy> wrote: Hi All Just to follow on from Ariel’s email: consideration and input on the language drafted for A5 and A6 by the represented groups of this EPDP Team is really important to our work. Rather than rely on the assumption that no comment means agreement, I’d prefer to have each represented group actively confirm their agreement if that is indeed the case and if not, provide comments/input so that we can discuss areas of contention and find agreeable language for all to the extent possible. Thanks Donna From: Gnso-epdp-idn-team <gnso-epdp-idn-team-bounces@icann.org<mailto:gnso-epdp-idn-team-bounces@icann.org>> On Behalf Of Ariel Liang Sent: Wednesday, February 9, 2022 2:22 AM To: gnso-epdp-idn-team@icann.org<mailto:gnso-epdp-idn-team@icann.org> Subject: [Gnso-epdp-idn-team] Draft Outcome: Charter Questions A5 & A6 Caution: This email is from an external sender. Please do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Forward suspicious emails to isitbad@. Dear All, Please find the draft outcome language for charter questions A5 and A6 on this google doc, pp.6-11: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Bt0LT45UaLynFNverh1nJhyvq6q6NxgSFAOnOp2L... [nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?...> (it is also posted on the wiki page here: https://community.icann.org/x/XwyHCg [nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?...>). Following the agreed format, the draft outcome language includes the following components: * Brief answer to the charter question * Recommendations and implementation guidance * Rationale for recommendations and implementation guidance We would like to highlight the following elements: * Recommendation 1.5 under A5 (p.6): this proposed recommendation may be revisited after the EPDP Team tackles other charter questions; additional details may need to be fleshed out. * Recommendation 1.6 under A6 (p.9): please pay particular attention to the proposed definition of “grandfathering” and provide input, if any. Please provide any input/suggestion for the draft outcome language on the mailing list by Tuesday, 22 January. Any substantive comments will be discussed during the EPDP Team meeting in about two weeks. Best Regards, Steve, Emily, Ariel _______________________________________________ Gnso-epdp-idn-team mailing list Gnso-epdp-idn-team@icann.org<mailto:Gnso-epdp-idn-team@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-epdp-idn-team