Marika, On Legal vs Natural, you can definitely say that the ALAC supports making the distinction mandatory. In the sentence "They further are of the view that this critical issue falls squarely within the scope of the EPDP, as it is already addressed in the Temporary Specification.", "is already addressed" is somewhat misleading as it might be construed to imply that the Temp Spec already requires the distinction. However, the Temp Spec does reference the issue in "Annex: Important Issues for Further Community Action" and the EPDP Charter explicitly asks whether the distinction should be required so there is no question the issue is within scope. On redactions, the ALAC supports the proposal that Rec #3, redactions only apply to registrants who are natural persons where anonymized e-mail addresses or a web form be provided, and that for legal persons, the original addresses be provided. This is in line with the EDPB letter of 05 July. In fact, the letter goes further in that it is not restricted to legal persons and says that all registrants could use non-personal e-mail address which would therefore not need to be anonymized. Hadia on behalf of myself and Alan