Hi Hadia, The language which is in the report matches my recollection of what was agreed on in yesterday's call. Best wishes, Ayden Férdeline ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ On Wednesday, 21 November 2018 15:19, Hadia Abdelsalam Mokhtar EL miniawi <Hadia@tra.gov.eg> wrote:
Hi Marika and all,
I can see the suggestion with regard to purpose O on page 30, however this was not a proposal made by the ALAC, BC and PC. Actually the whole team agreed on attempting to draft such a purpose, and those who worked on it were from SSAC and NCSG. I suggest changing the language to convey this. Like
" The EPDP proposed considering a Purpose for Processing Registration Data to address the needs and benefits ….."
Best
Hadia
From: Gnso-epdp-team [mailto:gnso-epdp-team-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Hadia Abdelsalam Mokhtar EL miniawi Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2018 4:10 PM To: Trang Nguyen; Marika Konings; Gnso-epdp-team@icann.org Subject: Re: [Gnso-epdp-team] For Final Review - Initial Report - deadline Wednesday 21 November at 18.00 UTC
Hi Marika and all,
Thank you for all the hard work, I have made a couple (minor-mainly typos) of suggestions, however I wanted to ask about purpose O. As I recall the staff was supposed to circulate a proposed language. I wonder if I missed any emails in this regard.
Best
Hadia
From: Gnso-epdp-team [mailto:gnso-epdp-team-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Trang Nguyen Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2018 7:43 AM To: Marika Konings; Gnso-epdp-team@icann.org Subject: Re: [Gnso-epdp-team] For Final Review - Initial Report - deadline Wednesday 21 November at 18.00 UTC
Dear EPDP Team,
Regarding recommendation #13, as we flagged today in the chat and previously provided in the ICANN feedback [document](https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-epdp-team/2018-November/000895.html), there are implementation-related issues and concerns that we look forward to continuing to discuss with the Team. For example, the practicality as well as cost of negotiating, monitoring, supporting, and enforcing 1200+ different agreements with potentially different obligations. We’d also like to flag some additional suggestions and questions on recommendation #13. For easy viewing, we extracted recommendation #13 from the draft Initial report and provided the suggestions and questions in the comment fields. To be clear, we do not believe that these items should delay publication of the Initial Report. We look forward to continued discussion with the EPDP Team on this topic.
The one thing that we do want to flag for the EPDP Team’s consideration prior to the publication of the Initial Report is the inconsistency in how recommendation #13 is displayed in Section 2 and Section 4 of the Initial Report. Section 2 only contains 2 paragraphs while Section 4 contains these two paragraphs plus several paragraphs of additional text. Since the additional text does not appear in Section 2 of the report, we assume it is not part of the recommendation. If this assumption is correct, it would be helpful to make the separation of the additional text clearer in Section 4 of the report.
Dan and Trang
ICANN org liaisons
From: Gnso-epdp-team <gnso-epdp-team-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Marika Konings <marika.konings@icann.org> Date: Tuesday, November 20, 2018 at 11:46 AM To: "Gnso-epdp-team@icann.org" <Gnso-epdp-team@icann.org> Subject: [Gnso-epdp-team] For Final Review - Initial Report - deadline Wednesday 21 November at 18.00 UTC
[Dear EPDP Team,]
We are pleased to share the proposed Initial Report for publication. Thank you again for attending and constructively contributing to the many hours of meetings over the past few days.
- Redline – [https://drive.google.com/a/icann.org/file/d/171jOv42nahKFnPW1WhSE8ckr6K00i4R... [drive.google.com]](https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__drive.google.com_a_ican...)
- Clean – [https://drive.google.com/a/icann.org/file/d/1OyG6ExIGkemW902jHYF7V88Y8mu-kOb... [drive.google.com]](https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__drive.google.com_a_ican...)
Note that in the redline version, you will find highlighted in yellow the updates proposed by Thomas for the responsibilities section. He also spotted some inconsistencies in the related tables that have been updated accordingly (as well as the related data elements workbooks sections). Please also note that per Monday’s discussion, the summary has been split out into an Executive Summary and Overview of Preliminary Recommendations.
For your convenience, you will also find attached the clean Word version. However, should you spot any minor issues or show stoppers, please use the line number reference in the pdf version to facilitate locating the language. Minor issues (e.g. grammatical, readability) can be sent to staff off list.
Due to internal ICANN processing times and deadlines we require feedback by 1800 UTC, tomorrow, 21 November. If you need additional time (not more than two hours), you must notify us before the 1800 cut off.
Best regards,
Caitlin, Berry and Marika
Marika Konings
Vice President, Policy Development Support – GNSO, Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
Email: marika.konings@icann.org
Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO
Find out more about the GNSO by taking our [interactive courses](https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__learn.icann.org_courses_...) and visiting the [GNSO Newcomer pages](https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_sites_gns...).