There already is a process for amending Registry Registrar Agreements (RRAs). I don’t see that this language addresses a need or what it is trying to accomplish. Absent a clearly defined need I don’t support this as a new recommendation. Best, Marc From: Gnso-epdp-team <gnso-epdp-team-bounces@icann.org> On Behalf Of Marika Konings Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2019 3:00 PM To: gnso-epdp-team@icann.org Subject: [EXTERNAL] [Gnso-epdp-team] Proposed language in relation to process for amendments to RRAs Dear EPDP Team, In relation to the process for amendments to Registry – Registrar agreements, as discussed during today’s EPDP Team meeting, please find hereby the proposed language for inclusion in the implementation section of the report: New Recommendation: The EPDP Team recommends that, as part of the implementation, a process for amendments to Registry - Registrar agreements (RRAs) needed to implement the EPDP recommendations is considered. If you have any concerns about this language, please indicate this by Thursday 7 February COB. Best regards, Caitlin, Berry and Marika Marika Konings Vice President, Policy Development Support – GNSO, Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Email: marika.konings@icann.org<mailto:marika.konings@icann.org> Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__learn.icann.org_courses_...> and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_sites_gns...>.