Hi, I also apologize for sending this in after the deadline. I didn't see any need to change any of the existing proposes questions. My concern is not about the questions already being readied for submission. Rather, I am concerned that we aren't asking about the implications and limits of semi-automated processing of disclosure requests. By "semi-automated processing", I mean processing which is mostly automated but which contains triggers which pass requests off to a human. Examples might be "your credentials are valid but I have never received a request from you", "the nature or volume of requests has suddenly changed", the data subject is a child", or "your credentials indicate that you are LEA from a jurisdiction of concern". All of the models we have discussed can support semi-automated request processing. - In the centralized model, the automation could happen at the central authorizer. - In the hybrid model, each CP could utilize automated processing within their own systems. - And we've had further suggestions for additional hybridization in the recent calls, where CPs pool resources to share an authorizer, or where a central authorizer automates a portion of the requests and hands off some subset of them back to the CP for processing. -----Original Message----- From: Gnso-epdp-team <gnso-epdp-team-bounces@icann.org> On Behalf Of Amr Elsadr Sent: Monday, January 20, 2020 1:55 AM To: Mark Svancarek via Gnso-epdp-team <gnso-epdp-team@icann.org> Subject: [EXTERNAL] [Gnso-epdp-team] NCSG Feedback on EPDP Phase 2/Batch 2 Legal Questions for Bird & Bird Hi, Apologies for not sending these in before the deadline, but attached is the NCSG Team feedback on the Batch 2 legal questions proposed by the Legal Committee to be sent to Bird & Bird. Thanks. Amr