So now we get an entire, 25-page paper written by ICANN staff. This again appears to me as if Goran is running a parallel PDP of his own and has no idea what the EPDP is for, what we are supposed to be doing, and what division of labor exists between EPDP and the so-called strawberry team Could someone explain this to me? It is evident that Goran himself can’t. Dr. Milton L Mueller School of Public Policy Georgia Institute of Technology [IGP_logo_gold block_email sig] From: Gnso-epdp-team <gnso-epdp-team-bounces@icann.org> On Behalf Of Janis Karklins Sent: Friday, October 25, 2019 9:58 AM To: EPDP <gnso-epdp-team@icann.org>; gnso-epdp-lead@icann.org Subject: [Gnso-epdp-team] ICANN Org questions to the EDPB Dear Team members, This morning Goran shared with me the Strawberry paper, which has been sent to the European Data Protection Board. This paper outlines a Unified Access Model (UAM) based on the Technical Study Group’s technical model<https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/technical-model-access-non-publi...>, which the Strawberry team described to the Team in Marrakech and at our meeting in Los Angeles. The questions to the EDPB are outlined in Section 8 of this paper. ICANN Org is asking the European data protection authorities to provide substantive input on these issues. Any answers that will be provided ICANN Org will forward to the EPDP to inform our policy discussions. At the same time Goran suggested that if the EPDP would have any further questions to ask of the DPAs, we should send them to Goran for subsequent communication to the EDPB. Of course, the Team can also ask questions to Georgios who is working at the European Commission. I hope you will find the document informative. We have planned to discuss ICANN Org input in one of the Montreal Team meetings. I do not intend to open discussion about this document during our upcoming Tuesday's call. Thank you for your consideration JK
