Good question, Brian. Yes, for purposes of this exercise “ICANN org” means ICANN org or its designee. Best regards, Marika, Berry, and Caitlin From: "King, Brian" <Brian.King@markmonitor.com> Date: Wednesday, September 18, 2019 at 8:03 AM To: Caitlin Tubergen <caitlin.tubergen@icann.org>, "gnso-epdp-team@icann.org" <gnso-epdp-team@icann.org> Subject: [Ext] RE: Decision to disclose input document Thank you, Caitlin. For the purposes of the first table in this document, should we assume that “ICANN Org” means ICANN or its designee in the event ICANN outsources this? Brian J. King Director of Internet Policy and Industry Affairs T +1 443 761 3726 markmonitor.com [markmonitor.com] MarkMonitor Protecting companies and consumers in a digital world From: Gnso-epdp-team <gnso-epdp-team-bounces@icann.org> On Behalf Of Caitlin Tubergen Sent: Friday, September 13, 2019 2:25 PM To: gnso-epdp-team@icann.org Subject: [Gnso-epdp-team] Decision to disclose input document Dear EPDP Team, Further to the following action item from the F2F, “Support staff to create a Google Doc in which EPDP Team Members are to review and consider the types of disclosure decision models (in other words, who is making the ultimate determination to disclose non-public registration data - contracted party or ICANN) and what would make these options acceptable to the different groups by Thursday, September 19,” please find the a Google Doc for your input: https://docs.google.com/document/d/10VRZRziGDXvckC_y3ob_SGB-1NN9WrL6Y6A3XQun... [docs.google.com]. Thank you, and have a nice weekend. Best regards, Marika, Berry, and Caitlin