Alan, can you clarify why you consider that this is not covered under recommendation #6: "The EPDP Team recommends that, as soon as commercially reasonable, Registrar must provide the opportunity for the Registered Name Holder to provide its Consent to publish additional contact information in the RDS for the sponsoring registrar." Thanks, Caitlin, Berry and Marika On 2/15/19, 08:55, "Gnso-epdp-team on behalf of Alan Greenberg" <gnso-epdp-team-bounces@icann.org on behalf of alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca> wrote: Temp Spec 2.3 allowed a registrant to consent to publication of redacted fields. In Toronto, we noted that this did not apply to e-mail since it was not technically "redacted". Rec #6 addressed this. But we seem to have lost the ability of a registrant to consnt to publication of the redacted fields! Is this an error that will be corrected or intentional (I do not recall such a decision). Alan _______________________________________________ Gnso-epdp-team mailing list Gnso-epdp-team@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-epdp-team