New subject: Question 5 to the Community - clarification needed

16 Jun 2021

      I can't recall whether there have been PDP 
reports that have been revised, but ICANN has 
revised other published papers before. Sometimes 
without evening annotating the cover page that it 
is revised - or changing the URL.

Hopefully, if this one is revised (and as I see 
it, the benefits far outweigh the problems), 
hopefully the cover page will note the revision 
and there will be a Revision list somewhere in the document.

Alan

At 2021-06-15 04:44 PM, Kapin, Laureen via Gnso-epdp-team wrote:
...
Although what you describe about the rest of the 
report is accurate, I still think the omission 
of the word âanonymizedâ is simply a mistake 
that we should correct and to let it stand 
uncorrected will cause confusion.  Might you 
explain why there is resistance to correcting 
this simple error?  I suspect that PDPâs have 
published corrected versions before.
Kind regards,
Laureen Kapin
Acting Assistant Director
Division of Consumer Response and Operations
Bureau of Consumer Protection
Federal Trade Commission
From: Marika Konings <marika.konings@icann.org>
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2021 4:36 PM
To: Becky Burr <becky.burr@board.icann.org>; Kapin, Laureen <LKAPIN@ftc.gov>
Cc: gnso-epdp-team@icann.org
Subject: Re: [Gnso-epdp-team] Question 5 to the 
Community - clarification needed
Please also note that the preceding section in 
the Initial Report defines these terms (note, 
there are also some footnotes that go with these definitions):
Â·       "Registrant-based email contact", means 
âan email for all domains registered by a 
unique registrant [sponsored by a given 
Registrar] OR [across Registrars], which is 
intended to be pseudonymous data when processed by non-contracted parties.
Â·       "Registration-based email contact", 
means âa separate single use email for each 
domain name registered by a unique registrant, 
which is intended to be anonymous data when 
processed by non-contracted parties.
We can make sure that a reference to these 
definitions is included in the public comment 
form to make sure that those that only look at 
the form have the appropriate context.
Best regards,
Caitlin, Berry and Marika
From: Gnso-epdp-team 
<gnso-epdp-team-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of 
Becky Burr via Gnso-epdp-team <gnso-epdp-team@icann.org>
Reply to: Becky Burr <becky.burr@board.icann.org>
Date: Tuesday, 15 June 2021 at 21:59
To: "Kapin, Laureen" <LKAPIN@ftc.gov>
Cc: "gnso-epdp-team@icann.org" <gnso-epdp-team@icann.org>
Subject: Re: [Gnso-epdp-team] Question 5 to the 
Community - clarification needed
do you mean pseudonymized rather than anonymized?
On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 3:36 PM Kapin, Laureen 
via Gnso-epdp-team 
<<mailto:gnso-epdp-team@icann.org>gnso-epdp-team@icann.org> wrote:
In preparing for tomorrowâs presentation, I 
realized that Question 5 to the Community omits 
an important word, âanonymized.â We should correct this.
Here is the Question from the Initial Report:
EPDP Team Question for Community Input #5
Does this guidance as written provide sufficient 
information and resources to Registrars and 
Registry Operators who wish to publish a 
registrant- or registration-based email address? 
If not, what is missing and why?
Taken literally, this might leave the impression 
that the Recommendation is to publish a standard 
email address.  In fact, our deliberations 
involved the publication of an anonymized (or 
more precisely, pseudonymized) email address.  I 
request that we correct this oversight both so 
that our intention is clear and so that the 
public comments solicited focus on the real 
topic to consider  whether to publish some 
formm of an anonymized email address.
I propose that we publish a corrected version of 
the Initial Report that inserts the word 
âanonymizedâ prior to âregistrant- or 
registration-based email addressâ to correct this oversight.
Kind regards,
Laureen Kapin
Acting Assistant Director
Division of Consumer Response and Operations
Bureau of Consumer Protection
Federal Trade Commission
_______________________________________________
Gnso-epdp-team mailing list
<mailto:Gnso-epdp-team@icann.org>Gnso-epdp-team@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-epdp-team
_______________________________________________
By submitting your personal data, you consent to 
the processing of your personal data for 
purposes of subscribing to this mailing list 
accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy 
(<https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy>https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) 
and the website Terms of Service 
(<https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos>https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). 
You can visit the Mailman link above to change 
your membership status or configuration, 
including unsubscribing, setting digest-style 
delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
_______________________________________________
Gnso-epdp-team mailing list
Gnso-epdp-team@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-epdp-team
_______________________________________________
By submitting your personal data, you consent to 
the processing of your personal data for 
purposes of subscribing to this mailing list 
accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy 
(https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the 
website Terms of Service 
(https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can 
visit the Mailman link above to change your 
membership status or configuration, including 
unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or 
disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.

Re: [Gnso-epdp-team] Question 5 to the Community - clarification needed

Alan Greenberg

Drazek, Keith

Kapin, Laureen

King, Brian

tags

participants (4)