Please review - action items and outstanding items
Dear EPDP Team, Following this week’s EPDP Team meetings, please find below and attached the outstanding action items and related deadlines, outstanding charter questions (not yet discussed) and punch list of items in relation to the data elements workbooks. Please take note that Staff’s provision of an updated and comprehensive data matrix and updated Initial Report draft is dependent on timely delivery of input on the below items. If you believe anything is missing from the list below, please let us know. Thank you for all your support - safe travels home! Caitlin, Berry and Marika =================== EPDP Team Action items ICANN63 Action item #1 – CPH to confirm whether or not purpose A strikethrough language can be removed by Thursday 25 October. (COMPLETED – deletion of strikethrough language confirmed) Action item #2 - Each group (SG/C/AC) to express the group's views and/or proposed edits on small team #1 responses to charter questions and preliminary recommendations with the mailing list by Monday 29 October. (see https://docs.google.com/document/d/1U6POLQhFNGu1Bo1k0rCluiaVZ27-OKIPpU8K8N1d...). Action item #3 - Each group (SG/C/AC) to express the group's views and/or proposed edits on the revised responses of the small team #2 charter question responses with the mailing list by Monday 29 October. (see https://docs.google.com/document/d/1d49LseyUovDVy7NEEUFZk4BtVP_muyLQJR9JRbPi...). Action item #4 – Each group (SG/C/AC) to review latest versions of data elements workbooks and flag any issues that need to be reviewed prior to publication of Initial Report by Friday 2 November. (see https://community.icann.org/x/5AC8BQ). Action item #5 – Each group (SG/C/AC) to review the responsible parties overview for all purposes and identify which designations need to be further considered by Monday 29 October. (see https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-rdfchOwpANFVKOtnM_9bPp-zT4JAvTN8dJqebdi...) Note: Staff’s provision of an updated and comprehensive data matrix and updated Initial Report draft is dependent on timely delivery of the above feedback. Outstanding Charter Questions (not discussed yet or addressed through ongoing work) q) Sun-setting WHOIS Contractual Requirements q1) After migration to RDAP, when can requirements in the Contracts to use WHOIS protocol be eliminated? q2) If EPDP Team’s decision includes a replacement directory access protocol, such as RDAP, when can requirements in the Contracts to use WHOIS protocol be eliminated? b) Collection of registration data by registrar: b3) How shall legitimacy of collecting data be defined (at least for personal data collected from European registrants and others in jurisdictions with data protection law)? k) ICANN's responsibilities in processing data k2) In addition to any specific duties ICANN may have as data controller, what other obligations should be noted by this EPDP Team, including any duties to registrants that are unique and specific to ICANN’s role as the administrator of policies and contracts governing gTLD domain names? l) Registrar's responsibilities in processing data l4) What are the registrar's responsibilities to the data subject with respect to data processing activities that are under ICANN’s control? m) Registry's responsibilities in processing data m4) What are the registry's responsibilities to the data subject based on the above? Outstanding items in data elements workbooks Purpose B Punch List: * Confirm staff-suggested responses for Purpose Rationale questions * Confirm data elements (note: Purpose B data elements are dependent on the completion of all other workbooks, as Purpose B only references data already collected) Purpose C Punch List: * Confirm staff-suggested response for Purpose Rationale questions * Confirm staff-suggested note re: definition of optional (footnote 2 in workbook) * Confirm data elements Purpose E (Registrar Data Escrow) Punch List: * Confirm Collection Processing Activity (Purpose does not necessarily require collection) * Confirm data elements Purpose F Punch List: * Confirm staff-suggested response for Purpose Rationale questions * Confirm data elements Purpose M Punch List: * Determine inclusion/exclusion of RDDRP, PDDRP, and PICDRP RPMs within the purpose statement (adjust PAs if excluded) * Confirm staff-suggested responses for Purpose Rationale questions * Confirm Processing Activities structure, especially Disclosure and Retention * Confirm Data Elements Purpose N Punch List: * Determine if Purpose Statement is an ICANN Purpose (note Collection PA indicates ICANN as a Joint Controller) * Confirm Processing Activities structure, especially Disclosure and Retention * Confirm Data Element (Other Data) Marika Konings Vice President, Policy Development Support – GNSO, Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Email: marika.konings@icann.org<mailto:marika.konings@icann.org> Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__learn.icann.org_courses_...> and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_sites_gns...>.
Hi Marika,
On Oct 25, 2018, at 1:26 PM, Marika Konings <marika.konings@icann.org> wrote:
[SNIP]
Action item #3 - Each group (SG/C/AC) to express the group's views and/or proposed edits on the revised responses of the small team #2 charter question responses with the mailing list by Monday 29 October. (see https://docs.google.com/document/d/1d49LseyUovDVy7NEEUFZk4BtVP_muyLQJR9JRbPi...).
I seem to need permission to access this google doc. Would you please change its share settings, so that this isn’t necessary? Thanks. Amr
Dear All, As noted in a subsequent email, please use this link to review the latest version of the small team #2 language as the original google doc did not show track changes: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1tamJeyaq4nC8HHQelSeln_BB8fnVlz9I/view. For your convenience, the pdf version is also attached. Best regards, Caitlin, Berry and Marika From: Amr Elsadr <aelsadr@icannpolicy.ninja> Reply-To: Amr Elsadr <aelsadr@icannpolicy.ninja> Date: Monday, October 29, 2018 at 3:23 AM To: Marika Konings <marika.konings@icann.org> Cc: EPDP <gnso-epdp-team@icann.org> Subject: [Ext] Re: [Gnso-epdp-team] Please review - action items and outstanding items Hi Marika, On Oct 25, 2018, at 1:26 PM, Marika Konings <marika.konings@icann.org<mailto:marika.konings@icann.org>> wrote: [SNIP] Action item #3 - Each group (SG/C/AC) to express the group's views and/or proposed edits on the revised responses of the small team #2 charter question responses with the mailing list by Monday 29 October. (see https://docs.google.com/document/d/1d49LseyUovDVy7NEEUFZk4BtVP_muyLQJR9JRbPi... [docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__docs.google.com_documen...>). I seem to need permission to access this google doc. Would you please change its share settings, so that this isn’t necessary? Thanks. Amr
Thanks. Amr
On Oct 29, 2018, at 2:05 PM, Marika Konings <marika.konings@icann.org> wrote:
Dear All,
As noted in a subsequent email, please use this link to review the latest version of the small team #2 language as the original google doc did not show track changes:https://drive.google.com/file/d/1tamJeyaq4nC8HHQelSeln_BB8fnVlz9I/view. For your convenience, the pdf version is also attached.
Best regards,
Caitlin, Berry and Marika
From: Amr Elsadr <aelsadr@icannpolicy.ninja> Reply-To: Amr Elsadr <aelsadr@icannpolicy.ninja> Date: Monday, October 29, 2018 at 3:23 AM To: Marika Konings <marika.konings@icann.org> Cc: EPDP <gnso-epdp-team@icann.org> Subject: [Ext] Re: [Gnso-epdp-team] Please review - action items and outstanding items
Hi Marika,
On Oct 25, 2018, at 1:26 PM, Marika Konings <marika.konings@icann.org> wrote:
[SNIP]
Action item #3 - Each group (SG/C/AC) to express the group's views and/or proposed edits on the revised responses of the small team #2 charter question responses with the mailing list by Monday 29 October. (see [https://docs.google.com/document/d/1d49LseyUovDVy7NEEUFZk4BtVP_muyLQJR9JRbPi... [docs.google.com]](https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__docs.google.com_documen...)).
I seem to need permission to access this google doc. Would you please change its share settings, so that this isn’t necessary?
Thanks.
Amr
<RySG revisions Small Team #2 Geographic - updated.pdf>
Hi again, It looks like the NCSG will need a little more time on action items 1, 2 and 5, which are all due today. Some of us are still in transit following ICANN 63, and others are busy settling back in. We hope to have more for the EPDP Team before our call on Thursday, 1 November. Thanks again. Amr
On Oct 29, 2018, at 2:42 PM, Amr Elsadr <aelsadr@icannpolicy.ninja> wrote:
Thanks.
Amr
On Oct 29, 2018, at 2:05 PM, Marika Konings <marika.konings@icann.org> wrote:
Dear All,
As noted in a subsequent email, please use this link to review the latest version of the small team #2 language as the original google doc did not show track changes:https://drive.google.com/file/d/1tamJeyaq4nC8HHQelSeln_BB8fnVlz9I/view. For your convenience, the pdf version is also attached.
Best regards,
Caitlin, Berry and Marika
From: Amr Elsadr <aelsadr@icannpolicy.ninja> Reply-To: Amr Elsadr <aelsadr@icannpolicy.ninja> Date: Monday, October 29, 2018 at 3:23 AM To: Marika Konings <marika.konings@icann.org> Cc: EPDP <gnso-epdp-team@icann.org> Subject: [Ext] Re: [Gnso-epdp-team] Please review - action items and outstanding items
Hi Marika,
On Oct 25, 2018, at 1:26 PM, Marika Konings <marika.konings@icann.org> wrote:
[SNIP]
Action item #3 - Each group (SG/C/AC) to express the group's views and/or proposed edits on the revised responses of the small team #2 charter question responses with the mailing list by Monday 29 October. (see [https://docs.google.com/document/d/1d49LseyUovDVy7NEEUFZk4BtVP_muyLQJR9JRbPi... [docs.google.com]](https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__docs.google.com_documen...)).
I seem to need permission to access this google doc. Would you please change its share settings, so that this isn’t necessary?
Thanks.
Amr
<RySG revisions Small Team #2 Geographic - updated.pdf>
All, The attached version of the Purpose M worksheet contains my comments and suggested revisions (highlighted in yellow). The question 1 answer issue flagged by Milton for Purposes A-C applies here, too. In the interest of time, I did not send this to Diane for review before submitting so she may disagree. Finally, she or other IPC members/alternates may want to take a look at the answer to Q3, as I don’t have the time to fully do so before tomorrow’s meeting. K From: Gnso-epdp-team [mailto:gnso-epdp-team-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Marika Konings Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2018 7:27 AM To: EPDP <gnso-epdp-team@icann.org> Subject: [Gnso-epdp-team] Please review - action items and outstanding items Dear EPDP Team, Following this week’s EPDP Team meetings, please find below and attached the outstanding action items and related deadlines, outstanding charter questions (not yet discussed) and punch list of items in relation to the data elements workbooks. Please take note that Staff’s provision of an updated and comprehensive data matrix and updated Initial Report draft is dependent on timely delivery of input on the below items. If you believe anything is missing from the list below, please let us know. Thank you for all your support - safe travels home! Caitlin, Berry and Marika =================== EPDP Team Action items ICANN63 Action item #1 – CPH to confirm whether or not purpose A strikethrough language can be removed by Thursday 25 October. (COMPLETED – deletion of strikethrough language confirmed) Action item #2 - Each group (SG/C/AC) to express the group's views and/or proposed edits on small team #1 responses to charter questions and preliminary recommendations with the mailing list by Monday 29 October. (see https://docs.google.com/document/d/1U6POLQhFNGu1Bo1k0rCluiaVZ27-OKIPpU8K8N1d...). Action item #3 - Each group (SG/C/AC) to express the group's views and/or proposed edits on the revised responses of the small team #2 charter question responses with the mailing list by Monday 29 October. (see https://docs.google.com/document/d/1d49LseyUovDVy7NEEUFZk4BtVP_muyLQJR9JRbPi...). Action item #4 – Each group (SG/C/AC) to review latest versions of data elements workbooks and flag any issues that need to be reviewed prior to publication of Initial Report by Friday 2 November. (see https://community.icann.org/x/5AC8BQ). Action item #5 – Each group (SG/C/AC) to review the responsible parties overview for all purposes and identify which designations need to be further considered by Monday 29 October. (see https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-rdfchOwpANFVKOtnM_9bPp-zT4JAvTN8dJqebdi...) Note: Staff’s provision of an updated and comprehensive data matrix and updated Initial Report draft is dependent on timely delivery of the above feedback. Outstanding Charter Questions (not discussed yet or addressed through ongoing work) q) Sun-setting WHOIS Contractual Requirements q1) After migration to RDAP, when can requirements in the Contracts to use WHOIS protocol be eliminated? q2) If EPDP Team’s decision includes a replacement directory access protocol, such as RDAP, when can requirements in the Contracts to use WHOIS protocol be eliminated? b) Collection of registration data by registrar: b3) How shall legitimacy of collecting data be defined (at least for personal data collected from European registrants and others in jurisdictions with data protection law)? k) ICANN's responsibilities in processing data k2) In addition to any specific duties ICANN may have as data controller, what other obligations should be noted by this EPDP Team, including any duties to registrants that are unique and specific to ICANN’s role as the administrator of policies and contracts governing gTLD domain names? l) Registrar's responsibilities in processing data l4) What are the registrar's responsibilities to the data subject with respect to data processing activities that are under ICANN’s control? m) Registry's responsibilities in processing data m4) What are the registry's responsibilities to the data subject based on the above? Outstanding items in data elements workbooks Purpose B Punch List: * Confirm staff-suggested responses for Purpose Rationale questions * Confirm data elements (note: Purpose B data elements are dependent on the completion of all other workbooks, as Purpose B only references data already collected) Purpose C Punch List: * Confirm staff-suggested response for Purpose Rationale questions * Confirm staff-suggested note re: definition of optional (footnote 2 in workbook) * Confirm data elements Purpose E (Registrar Data Escrow) Punch List: * Confirm Collection Processing Activity (Purpose does not necessarily require collection) * Confirm data elements Purpose F Punch List: * Confirm staff-suggested response for Purpose Rationale questions * Confirm data elements Purpose M Punch List: * Determine inclusion/exclusion of RDDRP, PDDRP, and PICDRP RPMs within the purpose statement (adjust PAs if excluded) * Confirm staff-suggested responses for Purpose Rationale questions * Confirm Processing Activities structure, especially Disclosure and Retention * Confirm Data Elements Purpose N Punch List: * Determine if Purpose Statement is an ICANN Purpose (note Collection PA indicates ICANN as a Joint Controller) * Confirm Processing Activities structure, especially Disclosure and Retention * Confirm Data Element (Other Data) Marika Konings Vice President, Policy Development Support – GNSO, Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Email: marika.konings@icann.org<mailto:marika.konings@icann.org> Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__learn.icann.org_courses_...> and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_sites_gns...>.
All- Please find the attached version of Purpose M worksheet (in Word) with my comments, which are minor. Please excuse the delay in providing but I was asked to first circulate to the IPC and was only sent this late yesterday. There may be additional comments from the IPC due to the timing element. Sincerely, Diane Diane Plaut General Counsel and Privacy Officer [cid:image001.png@01D3CA70.18FC1D40] Direct +1 646-899-2806 diane.plaut@corsearch.com<mailto:diane.plaut@corsearch.com> 220 West 42nd Street, 11th Floor, New York, NY 10036, United States www.corsearch.com<http://www.corsearch.com/> Join Corsearch on Twitter<https://twitter.com/corsearch> Linkedin<https://www.linkedin.com/company/2593860/> Trademarks + Brands<http://trademarksandbrands.corsearch.com/> Customer Service/Platform Support: 1 800 SEARCH1™ (1 800 732 7241) Corsearch.USCustomerService@corsearch.com<mailto:Corsearch.USCustomerService@corsearch.com> Confidentiality Notice: This email and its attachments (if any) contain confidential information of the sender. The information is intended only for the use by the direct addressees of the original sender of this email. If you are not an intended recipient of the original sender (or responsible for delivering the message to such person), you are hereby notified that any review, disclosure, copying, distribution or the taking of any action in reliance of the contents of and attachments to this email is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender at the address shown herein and permanently delete any copies of this email (digital or paper) in your possession. From: Gnso-epdp-team <gnso-epdp-team-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of "Rosette, Kristina via Gnso-epdp-team" <gnso-epdp-team@icann.org> Reply-To: "Rosette, Kristina" <rosettek@amazon.com> Date: Monday, October 29, 2018 at 4:59 PM To: EPDP <gnso-epdp-team@icann.org> Subject: Re: [Gnso-epdp-team] Please review - action items and outstanding items All, The attached version of the Purpose M worksheet contains my comments and suggested revisions (highlighted in yellow). The question 1 answer issue flagged by Milton for Purposes A-C applies here, too. In the interest of time, I did not send this to Diane for review before submitting so she may disagree. Finally, she or other IPC members/alternates may want to take a look at the answer to Q3, as I don’t have the time to fully do so before tomorrow’s meeting. K From: Gnso-epdp-team [mailto:gnso-epdp-team-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Marika Konings Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2018 7:27 AM To: EPDP <gnso-epdp-team@icann.org> Subject: [Gnso-epdp-team] Please review - action items and outstanding items Dear EPDP Team, Following this week’s EPDP Team meetings, please find below and attached the outstanding action items and related deadlines, outstanding charter questions (not yet discussed) and punch list of items in relation to the data elements workbooks. Please take note that Staff’s provision of an updated and comprehensive data matrix and updated Initial Report draft is dependent on timely delivery of input on the below items. If you believe anything is missing from the list below, please let us know. Thank you for all your support - safe travels home! Caitlin, Berry and Marika =================== EPDP Team Action items ICANN63 Action item #1 – CPH to confirm whether or not purpose A strikethrough language can be removed by Thursday 25 October. (COMPLETED – deletion of strikethrough language confirmed) Action item #2 - Each group (SG/C/AC) to express the group's views and/or proposed edits on small team #1 responses to charter questions and preliminary recommendations with the mailing list by Monday 29 October. (see https://docs.google.com/document/d/1U6POLQhFNGu1Bo1k0rCluiaVZ27-OKIPpU8K8N1drdg/edit?usp=sharing<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1U6POLQhFNGu1Bo1k0rCluiaVZ27-OKIPpU8K8N1drdg/edit?usp=sharing>). Action item #3 - Each group (SG/C/AC) to express the group's views and/or proposed edits on the revised responses of the small team #2 charter question responses with the mailing list by Monday 29 October. (see https://docs.google.com/document/d/1d49LseyUovDVy7NEEUFZk4BtVP_muyLQJR9JRbPi-cU/edit?usp=sharing<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1d49LseyUovDVy7NEEUFZk4BtVP_muyLQJR9JRbPi-cU/edit?usp=sharing>). Action item #4 – Each group (SG/C/AC) to review latest versions of data elements workbooks and flag any issues that need to be reviewed prior to publication of Initial Report by Friday 2 November. (see https://community.icann.org/x/5AC8BQ<https://community.icann.org/x/5AC8BQ>). Action item #5 – Each group (SG/C/AC) to review the responsible parties overview for all purposes and identify which designations need to be further considered by Monday 29 October. (see https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-rdfchOwpANFVKOtnM_9bPp-zT4JAvTN8dJqebdi-dM/edit?usp=sharing<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-rdfchOwpANFVKOtnM_9bPp-zT4JAvTN8dJqebdi-dM/edit?usp=sharing>) Note: Staff’s provision of an updated and comprehensive data matrix and updated Initial Report draft is dependent on timely delivery of the above feedback. Outstanding Charter Questions (not discussed yet or addressed through ongoing work) q) Sun-setting WHOIS Contractual Requirements q1) After migration to RDAP, when can requirements in the Contracts to use WHOIS protocol be eliminated? q2) If EPDP Team’s decision includes a replacement directory access protocol, such as RDAP, when can requirements in the Contracts to use WHOIS protocol be eliminated? b) Collection of registration data by registrar: b3) How shall legitimacy of collecting data be defined (at least for personal data collected from European registrants and others in jurisdictions with data protection law)? k) ICANN's responsibilities in processing data k2) In addition to any specific duties ICANN may have as data controller, what other obligations should be noted by this EPDP Team, including any duties to registrants that are unique and specific to ICANN’s role as the administrator of policies and contracts governing gTLD domain names? l) Registrar's responsibilities in processing data l4) What are the registrar's responsibilities to the data subject with respect to data processing activities that are under ICANN’s control? m) Registry's responsibilities in processing data m4) What are the registry's responsibilities to the data subject based on the above? Outstanding items in data elements workbooks Purpose B Punch List: * Confirm staff-suggested responses for Purpose Rationale questions * Confirm data elements (note: Purpose B data elements are dependent on the completion of all other workbooks, as Purpose B only references data already collected) Purpose C Punch List: * Confirm staff-suggested response for Purpose Rationale questions * Confirm staff-suggested note re: definition of optional (footnote 2 in workbook) * Confirm data elements Purpose E (Registrar Data Escrow) Punch List: * Confirm Collection Processing Activity (Purpose does not necessarily require collection) * Confirm data elements Purpose F Punch List: * Confirm staff-suggested response for Purpose Rationale questions * Confirm data elements Purpose M Punch List: * Determine inclusion/exclusion of RDDRP, PDDRP, and PICDRP RPMs within the purpose statement (adjust PAs if excluded) * Confirm staff-suggested responses for Purpose Rationale questions * Confirm Processing Activities structure, especially Disclosure and Retention * Confirm Data Elements Purpose N Punch List: * Determine if Purpose Statement is an ICANN Purpose (note Collection PA indicates ICANN as a Joint Controller) * Confirm Processing Activities structure, especially Disclosure and Retention * Confirm Data Element (Other Data) Marika Konings Vice President, Policy Development Support – GNSO, Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Email: marika.konings@icann.org<mailto:marika.konings@icann.org> Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__learn.icann.org_courses_...> and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_sites_gns...>.
The ALAC will need additional time (until Thursday) to comment on The #2 Geographic Basis statement. Alan At 25/10/2018 07:26 AM, Marika Konings wrote: Dear EPDP Team, Following this week’s EPDP Team meetings, please find below and attached the outstanding action items and related deadlines, outstanding charter questions (not yet discussed) and punch list of items in relation to the data elements workbooks. Please take note that Staff’s provision of an updated and comprehensive data matrix and updated Initial Report draft is dependent on timely delivery of input on the below items. If you believe anything is missing from the list below, please let us know. Thank you for all your support - safe travels home! Caitlin, Berry and Marika =================== EPDP Team Action items ICANN63 Action item #1 – CPH to confirm whether or not purpose A strikethroough language can be removed by Thursday 25 October. (COMPLETED – deletion of strikethrough language conffirmed) Action item #2 - Each group (SG/C/AC) to express the group's views and/or proposed edits on small team #1 responses to charter questions and preliminary recommendations with the mailing list by Monday 29 October. (see https://docs.google.com/document/d/1U6POLQhFNGu1Bo1k0rCluiaVZ27-OKIPpU8K8N1d... ). Action item #3 - Each group (SG/C/AC) to express the group's views and/or proposed edits on the revised responses of the small team #2 charter question responses with the mailing list by Monday 29 October. (see https://docs.google.com/document/d/1d49LseyUovDVy7NEEUFZk4BtVP_muyLQJR9JRbPi... ). Action item #4 – Each group (SG/C/AC) to review latestt versions of data elements workbooks and flag any issues that need to be reviewed prior to publication of Initial Report by Friday 2 November. (see https://community.icann.org/x/5AC8BQ). Action item #5 – Each group (SG/C/AC) to review the respponsible parties overview for all purposes and identify which designations need to be further considered by Monday 29 October. (see https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-rdfchOwpANFVKOtnM_9bPp-zT4JAvTN8dJqebdi... ) Note: Staff’s provision of an updated and comprehensive data matrix and updated Initial Report draft is dependent on timely delivery of the above feedback. Outstanding Charter Questions (not discussed yet or addressed through ongoing work) q) Sun-setting WHOIS Contractual Requirements q1) After migration to RDAP, when can requirements in the Contracts to use WHOIS protocol be eliminated? q2) If EPDP Team’s decision includes a replacement directory access protocol, such as RDAP, when can requirements in the Contracts to use WHOIS protocol be eliminated? b) Collection of registration data by registrar: b3) How shall legitimacy of collecting data be defined (at least for personal data collected from European registrants and others in jurisdictions with data protection law)? k) ICANN's responsibilities in processing data k2) In addition to any specific duties ICANN may have as data controller, what other obligations should be noted by this EPDP Team, including any duties to registrants that are unique and specific to ICANN’s role as the administrator of policies and contracts governing gTLD domain names? l) Registrar's responsibilities in processing data l4) What are the registrar's responsibilities to the data subject with respect to data processing activities that are under ICANN’s control? m) Registry's responsibilities in processing data m4) What are the registry's responsibilities to the data subject based on the above? Outstanding items in data elements workbooks Purpose B Punch List: * Confirm staff-suggested responses for Purpose Rationale questions * Confirm data elements (note: Purpose B data elements are dependent on the completion of all other workbooks, as Purpose B only references data already collected) Purpose C Punch List: * Confirm staff-suggested response for Purpose Rationale questions * Confirm staff-suggested note re: definition of optional (footnote 2 in workbook) * Confirm data elements Purpose E (Registrar Data Escrow) Punch List: * Confirm Collection Processing Activity (Purpose does not necessarily require collection) * Confirm data elements Purpose F Punch List: * Confirm staff-suggested response for Purpose Rationale questions * Confirm data elements Purpose M Punch List: * Determine inclusion/exclusion of RDDRP, PDDRP, and PICDRP RPMs within the purpose statement (adjust PAs if excluded) * Confirm staff-suggested responses for Purpose Rationale questions * Confirm Processing Activities structure, especially Disclosure and Retention * Confirm Data Elements Purpose N Punch List: * Determine if Purpose Statement is an ICANN Purpose (note Collection PA indicates ICANN as a Joint Controller) * Confirm Processing Activities structure, especially Disclosure and Retention * Confirm Data Element (Other Data) Marika Konings Vice President, Policy Development Support – GNSO, Interrnet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Email: marika.konings@icann.org<mailto:marika.konings@icann.org> Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__learn.icann.org_courses_...> and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_sites_gns...>. _______________________________________________ Gnso-epdp-team mailing list Gnso-epdp-team@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-epdp-team
All, IPC also requests a little more time for the October 29 action items. Our plan is to submit our input by mid-day tomorrow. Thanks! Alex On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 6:33 PM Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca> wrote:
The ALAC will need additional time (until Thursday) to comment on The #2 Geographic Basis statement.
Alan
At 25/10/2018 07:26 AM, Marika Konings wrote:
Dear EPDP Team,
Following this week’s EPDP Team meetings, please find below and attached the outstanding action items and related deadlines, outstanding charter questions (not yet discussed) and punch list of items in relation to the data elements workbooks. Please take note that Staff’s provision of an updated and comprehensive data matrix and updated Initial Report draft is dependent on timely delivery of input on the below items. If you believe anything is missing from the list below, please let us know.
Thank you for all your support - safe travels home!
Caitlin, Berry and Marika
===================
*EPDP Team Action items* *ICANN63 *
*Action item #1 *– CPH to confirm whether or not purpose A strikethroough language can be removed *by Thursday 25 October*. (COMPLETED – deletion of strikethrough language conffirmed)
*Action item #2* - Each group (SG/C/AC) to express the group's views and/or proposed edits on small team #1 responses to charter questions and preliminary recommendations with the mailing list *by Monday 29 October. *(see
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1U6POLQhFNGu1Bo1k0rCluiaVZ27-OKIPpU8K8N1d... ).
*Action item #3* - Each group (SG/C/AC) to express the group's views and/or proposed edits on the revised responses of the small team #2 charter question responses with the mailing list *by Monday 29 October*. (see https://docs.google.com/document/d/1d49LseyUovDVy7NEEUFZk4BtVP_muyLQJR9JRbPi... ).
*Action item* *#4* – Each group (SG/C/AC) to review latestt versions of data elements workbooks and flag any issues that need to be reviewed prior to publication of Initial Report *by Friday 2 November*. (see https://community.icann.org/x/5AC8BQ).
*Action item #5* – Each group (SG/C/AC) to review the respponsible parties overview for all purposes and identify which designations need to be further considered by *Monday 29 October*. (see https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-rdfchOwpANFVKOtnM_9bPp-zT4JAvTN8dJqebdi... )
Note: Staff’s provision of an updated and comprehensive data matrix and updated Initial Report draft is dependent on timely delivery of the above feedback.
*Outstanding Charter Questions* (not discussed yet or addressed through ongoing work)
q) Sun-setting WHOIS Contractual Requirements
q1) After migration to RDAP, when can requirements in the Contracts to use WHOIS protocol be eliminated?
q2) If EPDP Team’s decision includes a replacement directory access protocol, such as RDAP, when can requirements in the Contracts to use WHOIS protocol be eliminated?
b) Collection of registration data by registrar:
b3) How shall legitimacy of collecting data be defined (at least for personal data collected from European registrants and others in jurisdictions with data protection law)?
k) ICANN's responsibilities in processing data
k2) In addition to any specific duties ICANN may have as data controller, what other obligations should be noted by this EPDP Team, including any duties to registrants that are unique and specific to ICANN’s role as the administrator of policies and contracts governing gTLD domain names?
l) Registrar's responsibilities in processing data
l4) What are the registrar's responsibilities to the data subject with respect to data processing activities that are under ICANN’s control?
m) Registry's responsibilities in processing data
m4) What are the registry's responsibilities to the data subject based on the above?
*Outstanding items in data elements workbooks *
Purpose B Punch List:
- Confirm staff-suggested responses for Purpose Rationale questions - Confirm data elements (note: Purpose B data elements are dependent on the completion of all other workbooks, as Purpose B only references data already collected)
Purpose C Punch List:
- Confirm staff-suggested response for Purpose Rationale questions - Confirm staff-suggested note re: definition of optional (footnote 2 in workbook) - Confirm data elements
Purpose E (Registrar Data Escrow) Punch List:
- Confirm Collection Processing Activity (Purpose does not necessarily require collection) - Confirm data elements
Purpose F Punch List:
- Confirm staff-suggested response for Purpose Rationale questions - Confirm data elements
Purpose M Punch List:
- Determine inclusion/exclusion of RDDRP, PDDRP, and PICDRP RPMs within the purpose statement (adjust PAs if excluded) - Confirm staff-suggested responses for Purpose Rationale questions - Confirm Processing Activities structure, especially Disclosure and Retention - Confirm Data Elements
Purpose N Punch List:
- Determine if Purpose Statement is an ICANN Purpose (note Collection PA indicates ICANN as a Joint Controller) - Confirm Processing Activities structure, especially Disclosure and Retention - Confirm Data Element (Other Data)
*Marika Konings *Vice President, Policy Development Support – GNSO, Interrnet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Email: marika.konings@icann.org
Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__learn.icann.org_courses_...> and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_sites_gns...>.
_______________________________________________ Gnso-epdp-team mailing list Gnso-epdp-team@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-epdp-team
_______________________________________________ Gnso-epdp-team mailing list Gnso-epdp-team@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-epdp-team
-- ___________ *Alex Deacon* Cole Valley Consulting alex@colevalleyconsulting.com +1.415.488.6009
participants (6)
-
Alan Greenberg -
Alex Deacon -
Amr Elsadr -
Marika Konings -
Plaut, Diane -
Rosette, Kristina