Hi all, Following on today’s meeting, I thought it’d be helpful to share the success criteria that I suggested on the call. The RDRS will gather disclosure request volumes, which will help inform the Board's decision about building the full SSAD. As such, success criteria should be tied to the RDRS’s ability to gather that request volume. Specifically: • Is the RDRS available to all possible requestors? • Is the RDRS available to all interested registrars? • Can the RDRS be used to submit requests? • Does the RDRS track request outcomes? If those are all ‘yes’, then the RDRS should be considered to be successfully gathering registration data disclosure request volumes. Thank you, -- Sarah Wyld, CIPP/E Policy & Privacy Manager Pronouns: she/they swyld@tucows.com From: Marika Konings Sent: March 27, 2023 7:16 AM To: gnso-epdpp2-smallteam@icann.org Subject: [GNSO-EPDPP2-SmallTeam] Proposed Agenda - EPDP Phase 2 small teammeeting on Monday 27 March at 17.30 UTC Dear All, Hereby the proposed agenda for the EPDP Phase 2 small team meeting which is scheduled for later today (Monday 27 March at 17.30 UTC): Proposed Agenda – EPDP Phase 2 Small Team meeting – Monday 27 March at 17.30 UTC 1. Welcome 2. Review updated EPDP Phase 2 small team assignment (see https://community.icann.org/x/PAoiCw) 3. Initial thoughts regarding how to tackle small team assignment questions: a. The other topics identified in the addendum that the small team did not consider gating factors but for which it would be interested to have further discussions with ICANN org during the implementation phase to consider if/how some of these aspects could be considered to be added in the current implementation of WDS or a future version (API, confidentiality options for LE requests, billing mechanism, review of terms and conditions for requestors as well as participating registrars, requests submitted fall under “reasonable access” & phase 1 requirements; ability for requestor to indicate if they do not agree with information logged by registrar); b. Success criteria for this System, which should include analysis of relevant usage data; c. How to best to promote and secure comprehensive use of the system, both by potential requestors as well as ICANN accredited registrars. 4. Data to be included in RDRS Reporting (see page 4 https://gnso.icann.org/sites/default/files/policy/2022/correspondence/ducos-...). Consider additional suggestions made and question regarding format / platform: a. Number of Requests by Requestor (may be pseudonymized/anonymized if needed) b. Denial Rate by Reason Type c. # of Registrars that have published information about the existence of RDRS on their web-sites and encouraged requestors to submit requests there d. Is there a preference for format and platform for the published metrics reports? 5. Confirm frequency of small team meetings 6. Confirm next steps & next meeting Best regards, Marika