I think that the INGOs were sufficiently considered in the first policy and hat is now been revised. The revision arises from a request by the GAC, through the NGPC, to modify the decisions with regards to the IGOs acronyms and some on the Red Cross. It is my opinion that we should focus on the IGOs and consider that the measures approved by the GNSO Council regarding the INGOs are sufficient. Best regards, Osvaldo Novoa
El 15/10/2014, a las 11:33, George Kirikos <icann@leap.com> escribió:
Hi folks,
During today's conference call, the topic of how INGOs got into this process was raised. Researching the mailing list of the prior working group, I believe the origin was the message at:
http://forum.icann.org/lists/gnso-igo-ingo/msg00885.html
where one of the participants put forward the idea that:
"Accreditation by ECOSOC is equivalent to the IGO treaty requirements and stands in fair stead to business oriented trademarks"
which, as Kristine noted in the chatroom during the call (I don't think the transcript is available yet, but will be) is probably not correct. i.e. her exact words were "I rather suspect it's much harder to get included in a treaty than to get on the ECOSOC list..."
I agree with Kristine.
Anyhow, I thought it would be good to capture this "history", in case we want to revisit this so-called "rationale" for adding INGOs.
Sincerely,
George Kirikos 416-588-0269 http://www.leap.com/ _______________________________________________ Gnso-igo-ingo-crp mailing list Gnso-igo-ingo-crp@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-igo-ingo-crp
El presente correo y cualquier posible archivo adjunto está dirigido únicamente al destinatario del mensaje y contiene información que puede ser confidencial. Si Ud. no es el destinatario correcto por favor notifique al remitente respondiendo anexando este mensaje y elimine inmediatamente el e-mail y los posibles archivos adjuntos al mismo de su sistema. Está prohibida cualquier utilización, difusión o copia de este e-mail por cualquier persona o entidad que no sean las específicas destinatarias del mensaje. ANTEL no acepta ninguna responsabilidad con respecto a cualquier comunicación que haya sido emitida incumpliendo nuestra Política de Seguridad de la Información This e-mail and any attachment is confidential and is intended solely for the addressee(s). If you are not intended recipient please inform the sender immediately, answering this e-mail and delete it as well as the attached files. Any use, circulation or copy of this e-mail by any person or entity that is not the specific addressee(s) is prohibited. ANTEL is not responsible for any communication emitted without respecting our Information Security Policy.