Hi folks, On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 11:50 AM, Paul Tattersfield <gpmgroup@gmail.com> wrote:
Given we have spent so long on all the issues perhaps it would be helpful if we could have a second draft report and invite public comment on a set of alternatives. (The possibility of second draft report was requested but this was also blocked.)
Agreed, a second draft report with public comments might make a lot of sense, along with the use of a "completely neutral and independent Chair" and/or "the use of a professional facilitator" as per section 6.1.3 of the guidelines that I quoted from earlier this morning. Fundamental issues of due process for registrants are at stake. The transparency and accountability mechanisms of ICANN need to be strictly followed when such an important issue is being determined. Sincerely, George Kirikos 416-588-0269 http://www.leap.com/