Hi folks, Since there's been no response to the call for the true numbers to be posted: https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-igo-ingo-crp/2018-May/001140.html let's attempt to do this transparently. I believe we might already have a consensus. The 6 options (not mutually exclusive!) were at: https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-igo-ingo-crp/2018-March/001093.html Briefly: Option 1: set aside the UDRP/URS decision, to put both sides back in the same position Option 2: use Option 1 for existing domain names, and Option 3 for newly created domains Option 3: arbitration Option 4: refer it to the RPM PDP Option 5: lock the domains in the event of an "in rem" lawsuit (not just "in personam") Option 6: mediation as a step, and then back to Option 1 if need be If you'd like to post your position/thoughts in an open and transparent manner, please do so in this thread, using the following template ---------------------------------- Name: Option 1: Option 2: Option 3: Option 4: Option 5: Option 6: ---------------------------------- For myself: Option 1: yes, I support this (ultimately my first choice) Option 2: yes, I can support this as a compromise Option 3: no, I can't support this Option 4: yes, I can support this; Paul Keating's prior suggestion of having Option 1 be the interim solution if Option 4 is Option 5: yes, I support this, and it works in parallel to all other options Option 6: yes, I support mediation Sincerely, George Kirikos 416-588-0269 http://www.leap.com/