Thanks Berry. I will do my best to participate in the call but in case I am unable to do so or can only attend a portion of it, I want to communicate my support as described in the agenda below. Note that I am participating as an individual and do not represent any group. Chuck From: Gnso-igo-ingo <gnso-igo-ingo-bounces@icann.org> On Behalf Of mail@berrycobb.com Sent: Wednesday, June 6, 2018 8:53 AM To: gnso-igo-ingo@icann.org Subject: [Gnso-igo-ingo] Agenda - Reconvened IGO-INGO Protections PDP Working Group (Red Cross) - 07 May 2018 @ 14:00 UTC Importance: High Hi All, Below is the proposed agenda for our next meeting scheduled 7 May 2018 at 14:00 UTC. This meeting is scheduled for 120 minutes. Agenda: 0. Roll call, Agenda bash and SOI Updates[Chuck Gomes] I updated my SOI to reflect that I no longer have a consulting agreement with Verisign to chair the RDS PDP WG. Although it is not mentioned in my SOI, note that I resigned as chair of the RDS PDP WG. (1) Review of Definitive List of National Society Names and variant principles (attached) - Principles & Scope of Protection for Red Cross Names - 6 June 2018.docx[Chuck Gomes] I support the following: a) the edits made to Additional Criteria; b) the proposed Error Correction bullet; c) the proposed Deletions bullet. I am a little confused about the section titled Remaining Issues for Discussion; I don't have strong feelings one way or the other on the specific requests; I have no objections to any changes in support of 1, 2 & 3; it appears to me that no action is needed for 4 but if one is agreed to, I am sure I could support it; I have no problem including the different grammatical forms in 5; the only way I would support the items in 6 is if we changed the rules to accommodate them and I would advise against that unless a strong case can be made to do so for any of them. - National Society names list_v0.4.xlsx[Chuck Gomes] I support this list. (2) Review of WG Preliminary Recommendations & start of consensus call (attached) - Proposed Draft Text of Reconvened WG Recommendations - 5 June 2018.docx[Chuck Gomes] I support the recommendations as edited. - note this is a substantial revision from the prior version sent a few weeks ago. The structure is the same, but text revisions to better reflect scope of discussions and prior events (3) Review proposed timeline and members list (attached) - Proposed Reconvened WG Timeline.docx[Chuck Gomes] The revised timeline seems reasonable to me. As we all know, timelines are hard to fix in advance, so it probably should be a best estimate timeline. (4) AoB and next meeting Thank you. B Berry A. Cobb GNSO Policy Consultant 720.839.5735 mail@berrycobb.com <mailto:mail@berrycobb.com> @berrycobb