Here's a crazy idea: does it make sense to merge IRTP-C and IRTP-D implementation teams? Recognizing that they would probably have different deployment dates, the two topics are very similar, and have nearly the same (identical?) work group membership. Thanks- J. From: <gnso-impl-irtpd-rt-bounces@icann.org<mailto:gnso-impl-irtpd-rt-bounces@icann.org>> on behalf of Caitlin Tubergen <caitlin.tubergen@icann.org<mailto:caitlin.tubergen@icann.org>> Date: Thursday, July 16, 2015 at 14:13 To: "Gnso-impl-irtpd-rt@icann.org<mailto:Gnso-impl-irtpd-rt@icann.org>" <Gnso-impl-irtpd-rt@icann.org<mailto:Gnso-impl-irtpd-rt@icann.org>> Subject: [Gnso-impl-irtpd-rt] Meeting Scheduling Take 2 Hi, Team. I received several emails from Implementation Review Team members who are unavailable to meet next week due to vacation plans and traveling. Please excuse the additional doodle poll, but this poll is for the following week. I have also added some additional times to accommodate more timezones. Please respond to the new poll here: http://doodle.com/5e6hnak4di2qmn4a Apologies again for the double email. To those of you who will be on vacation, have a wonderful holiday! Kind regards, Caitlin Tubergen Registrar Relations and Contracts Manager ICANN