Hello Steve, Thank you for your message. We do have an update on this topic planned for our meeting later today. Best Regards Fabien From: "Metalitz, Steven" <met@msk.com> Date: Tuesday, May 10, 2016 at 3:49 PM To: Fabien Betremieux <fabien.betremieux@icann.org>, "gnso-impl-thickwhois-rt@icann.org" <gnso-impl-thickwhois-rt@icann.org> Subject: RE: [Gnso-impl-thickwhois-rt] CL&D - Your Input on Staff Proposals - Due Wed. 11 May Fabien, I understand staff will brief the GNSO council on IRT activities at the next council meeting on Thursday. Could this be discussed briefly on today¹s IRT call? If staff will be basing the briefing on the slides presented at last week¹s IRT meeting, will you be able to modify these to specify that any proposed consolidation of the C&LD and T&T projects will not adversely impact the timeline for implementation of Thick Whois itself? Thanks. Steven J. Metalitz |Partner, through his professional corporation T: 202.355.7902 |met@msk.com <mailto:met@msk.com> Mitchell Silberberg & KnuppLLP|www.msk.com <http://www.msk.com/> 1818 N Street NW, 8th Floor, Washington, DC 20036 THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS E-MAIL MESSAGE IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE PERSONAL AND CONFIDENTIAL USE OF THE DESIGNATED RECIPIENTS. THIS MESSAGE MAY BE AN ATTORNEY-CLIENT COMMUNICATION, AND AS SUCH IS PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL. IF THE READER OF THIS MESSAGE IS NOT AN INTENDED RECIPIENT, YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT ANY REVIEW, USE, DISSEMINATION, FORWARDING OR COPYING OF THIS MESSAGE IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. PLEASE NOTIFY US IMMEDIATELY BY REPLY E-MAIL OR TELEPHONE, AND DELETE THE ORIGINAL MESSAGE AND ALL ATTACHMENTS FROM YOUR SYSTEM. THANK YOU. From: gnso-impl-thickwhois-rt-bounces@icann.org [mailto:gnso-impl-thickwhois-rt-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Fabien Betremieux Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2016 7:46 AM To: gnso-impl-thickwhois-rt@icann.org Subject: [Gnso-impl-thickwhois-rt] CL&D - Your Input on Staff Proposals - Due Wed. 11 May Dear IRT members, As discussed during our meeting, we would like to request you provide your input regarding Staff¹s question and proposals to address the public comments received on our initial implementation plan (https://www.icann.org/public-comments/rdds-output-2015-12-03-en). A a reminder, these question and proposals are the following: Question: * Is the issue created by referencing the 2013 RAA in a Consensus Policy applicable to registries a matter of policy or implementation ? Proposals: 1. Referral of the Registry vs. Registrar Expiration Date confusion for consideration by the RDS PDP Working Group 2. Optional display of the Registrar Registration Expiration Date, with mitigation measures similar to that of the AWIP policy if displayed 3. Proposed Bundling of T&T and CL&D implementation (more details on slide 4 of our presentation this week, available at: https://community.icann.org/display/TWCPI/IRT+Meetings) Please provide your input in response to this email by Wed. 11 May COB in your time zone. Please also note that we hope to focus our next IRT meeting (Tue. 10 May) on the implementation of the transition from thin to thick. Best Regards -- Fabien Betremieux Sr. Registry Services & Engagement Manager Global Domains Division, ICANN
