No, Avri, I was not alluding to any person or example; rather attempting to make clear the inequities I see with the current standard and rationale behind my thinking. In response to your comment on Charter clean-up, I appreciate your support for that work. In any case, I expect that, once we are done, we will need to have the GNSO Council sign-off on the revisions before they can go into effect. Kind regards, RA Ronald N. Andruff RNA Partners, Inc. -----Original Message----- From: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org] On Behalf Of Avri Doria Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2013 10:10 PM To: Gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] On SCI consensus and impasse On 23 Jan 2013, at 20:12, Ron Andruff wrote:
Holding the working group hostage until that individual deems to be satisfied, while others are not, is inequitable.
Are you alluding to an specific example. I find your reference to members of the group holding other members hostage, somewhat problematic. In terms of the charter, while I am comfortable with cleanup, I am not comfortable with a re-write. avri