May 7, 2014
6:56 p.m.
On 06-May-14 18:42, Aikman-Scalese, Anne wrote:
Ron, Mary, et al – On behalf of IPC, we support. We also note that it is within the purview of SCI to undertake the longer term study of WG Consensus levels and perhaps this should be mentioned when reporting to Council.
With all of the GNSO Review work about to start, I would not be too quick to jump into this particular activity. As a council member my inclination would be to defer this subject to the GNSO review. But as a SCI member, I have no objection to the request being made, it is just one I am not inclined toward. I am especially uncomfortable with the topic for the SCI as it is all tied up in the PDP by-laws and the nature of the house structure. avri